This Framework for Cooperation is undertaken by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (hereinafter referred to as “UNRWA”) and the Government of the United States of America (hereinafter referred to as “the United States” or “U.S.”). It is understood that this document, in its entirety, constitutes policy commitments by UNRWA and the U.S. Government, and is therefore not intended to be legally binding.
I. Mutual Strategic Goals:
UNRWA was established in 1949 to provide temporary support to Palestine refugees. It operates in Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, the West Bank and Gaza Strip on a budget mostly financed by voluntary contributions and employs almost 30,000 staff to provide education, primary health care, relief and social services and other assistance to Palestine refugees in its area of operations. In the 61 years since its inception, the number of registered Palestine refugees in UNRWA’s five operating fields has grown through natural population increase to over 4.7 million persons. The goal of U.S. support to UNRWA is to ensure that Palestine refugees live in dignity with an enhanced human development potential until a comprehensive and just solution is secured. These objectives match UNRWA’s ongoing goals to:
Assisting vulnerable populations through effective provision of humanitarian assistance is a key element of U.S. foreign policy. The U.S. provides humanitarian assistance on the basis of need according to principles of universality, impartiality, and human dignity, and recognizes that provision of assistance requires an integrated, coordinated, and multi-sectoral approach between UNRWA and all its donors to be most effective. All U.S. foreign assistance programs are required to demonstrate performance and accountability, and clearly link programming and funding directly to U.S. policy goals.
The United States commends UNRWA for its work to provide core services to Palestine refugees for over six decades, which has often required UNRWA to work during periods of conflict. The U.S. notes the Agency’s ongoing strategic planning efforts given the highly volatile political environment, unpredictable funding and other unforeseen circumstances that often pose challenges to the effective fulfillment of UNRWA’s mandate. The U.S. strongly supports UNRWA’s efforts to meet those challenges by its undertaking of the three following initiatives:
II. Organizational Reform Initiatives:
UNRWA has undertaken significant reform initiatives to improve management capacity and engage in more strategic planning and needs-based budgeting. The implementation of UNRWA’s three-year Organizational Development Plan (OD), which formally concluded in December 2009, resulted in a more transparent and field-based system of budgeting for the Agency’s needs, strengthening of the Agency’s monitoring and evaluation capacity, and improvements in the organizational structure of UNRWA, which has enhanced overall efficiency and effectiveness. Implementation of certain elements of the reform initiatives began in 2010 and will continue into 2011.
In support of UNRWA’s continued reform, the U.S. and UNRWA identify the following strategic objectives:
III. Performance Measures and Targets:
The U.S. commends UNRWA for its development of the Medium Term Strategy (MTS) for 2010-2015, which provides strategic direction for the Agency’s operations, as well as the development of Field Implementation Plans, which provide a more comprehensive picture of the needs of the Agency’s beneficiaries. Annex 1 provides milestones on UNRWA’s ongoing reform initiatives. Annex 2 provides general requirements performance indicators. Annex 3 details specific agreed upon performance indicators and 2011 targets for UNRWA’s health, education, relief and social services programs, emergency appeal programs, and efficiency, with the aim of moving toward finalized harmonized donor programming reporting requirements in 2012.
The U.S. and UNRWA identify the following goals related to performance measures and targets for UNRWA’s programs:
A. The U.S. and UNRWA remain committed to work with other donors to further refine outcome-based performance indicators, baseline data, and targets for UNRWA’s programs. In 2011, UNRWA is committed to strengthening its monitoring and evaluation functions through activities such as standardizing implementation plan reporting and executing the Donor Harmonization Plan to ensure donor programmatic reporting requirements dovetail with performance measures monitored and consolidated at an organizational level, based on Agency biennium plans;
B. UNRWA intends to continue to strengthen the Agency’s monitoring and evaluation and internal oversight functions for the effective oversight of UNRWA programs and services;
C. In 2011, UNRWA is committed to addressing and reporting to the United States on the performance measures included in Annex 3. Reporting is requested by March 31, 2012 on efforts and results as of December 31, 2011.
UNRWA works in a highly volatile environment where political and military actions frequently place constraints on the delivery of its services. Furthermore, the Agency is dependent for the majority of its funding on voluntary contributions provided by UN member states – contributions which fluctuate beyond UNRWA’s control. Therefore, it is important that UNRWA’s performance against identified indicators be reviewed in light of constraints imposed by the operating environment and funding made available to the Agency.
IV. The U.S. and UNRWA further identify the following issues of a more bilateral nature:
A. Conformance with Conditions for Funding in the United States Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, section 301 (c), as amended:
i. The United States appreciates the ongoing close consultation with UNRWA regarding section 301(c) of the United States Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended, which states: “No contributions by the United States shall be made to (UNRWA) except on the condition that (UNRWA) take all possible measures to assure than no part of the United States contribution shall be used to furnish assistance to any refugee who is receiving military training as a member of the so-called Palestine Liberation Army or any other guerilla type organization or who has engaged in any act of terrorism.” UNRWA is committed to taking all possible measures in conformance with section 301(c). The United States expects UNRWA to maintain constant vigilance with regard to 301(c) conformance.
ii. The United States and UNRWA share concerns about the threat of terrorism, including within the context of the United Nation’s firm commitment to counter terrorism and section 301(c) of the United States Foreign Assistance Act of 1961. To this end, UNRWA is committed to taking all possible measures to ensure that funding provided by the United States to support UNRWA is not used to provide assistance to, or otherwise support, terrorists or terrorist organizations.
iii. The United States and UNRWA intend that UNRWA will continue providing reports every six months regarding actions taken by the organization to ensure conformance with section 301(c) and other issues related to that section of law.
iv. The United States and UNRWA confirm that the Department of State will use the activities set out in Annex 4 as a way to evaluate UNRWA’s conformance with the condition on the U.S. contribution to UNRWA in section 301(c) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 and will use in its evaluation the information provided by UNRWA in the report referred to in sub-paragraph iii.
v. The United States and UNRWA are to continue to work together throughout 2011 to enhance collaboration and communication on issues related to conformance with section 301(c).
vi. The United States believes that the Operations Support Officer program in the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and Lebanon is essential in helping to ensure the neutrality of UNRWA facilities, and reiterates its intention to continue supporting these programs, subject to the availability of funding.
B Reporting:
The United States appreciates UNRWA’s commitment to provide more consistent and detailed reporting on the use of this funding especially given the importance of this data for shaping evidence-based policies and programs, and the need to satisfy PRM reporting requirements in 2011. UNRWA is committed to reporting on US funded ‘special projects’ as stipulated by the US approved project proposal. In addition to the biannual report on UNRWA actions regarding 301 (c ) of the U.S. Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (as referred to in paragraph IV.A.iii) and the biannual consolidated report on the West Bank/Gaza Emergency Appeal, UNRWA will provide a financial update on USG Emergency Appeal funding on a biannual basis. Beginning in 2011, UNRWA will report annually on the indicators contained in the Donor Harmonization Matrix.
V. Continued Support for UNRWA:
Signed on the 30th day of November 2010 at the Dead Sea, Jordan.
_________________________ ________________________
Filippo Grandi Kelly T. Clements
Commissioner-General Deputy Assistant Secretary
United Nations Relief and Bureau of Population,
Refugee Works Agency for Palestine Refugees, and Migration
Refugees in the Near East U.S. Department of State
Annexes:
Annex 1: Organizational Reform Milestones
Annex 2: General Requirements for and Classification of Performance Indicators
Annex 3: 2011 Indicators and Targets
Annex 4: Activities related to Conformance with Funding Conditions in Section 301(c)
ANNEX 1: ORGANIZATIONAL REFORM MILESTONES
In 2011, UNRWA anticipates that the following milestones and targets are achieved during the period under review. The United States notes that the milestones listed below may be modified by mutual agreement.
|
Continued Reform Objectives |
Milestones |
Target |
|
Implementation of a Program / Project Cycle Management (PCM) framework for all interventions |
Fully integrated and revised project procedures manual implemented, including redefined roles and responsibilities. |
Quarter One |
|
Internal Communication |
Internal communications strategy and plan, designed, as an Agency-wide pilot, specifically for the Sustaining Change programme, developed and under implementation |
Quarter Two |
|
Human Resources |
Administration of justice system established |
Quarter Two |
|
Enterprise Resource Planning |
UNRWA will have either selected a UN partner with a specific ERP solution for its implementation or will have selected a specific ERP vendor with a system integrator partner for its implementation. |
September |
|
Program Reforms |
Reform plans in the areas of Education, Health, and Relief and Social Services developed and under implementation |
Quarter Three |
ANNEX 2: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR AND CLASSIFICATION OF PERFORMANCE INDICATORS*
The following represents a list of general requirements for indicators to be used in a developmental context:
Indicators in Annex 2 are classified according to a clear typology listed below:
Input indicators measure the provided financial, administrative and regulatory resources (often called “process”). Example: amount of funds allocated to a specific project.
Output indicators measure the immediate and concrete consequences of the measures taken and resources used. Example: number of schools built.
Result indicators measure the results at the level of beneficiaries. Example: number of students enrolled.
Outcome indicators measure the consequences of the result. Example: literacy rates.
Efficiency indicators help to determine whether there are major design flaws in a program that would limit its effectiveness or efficiency.**
*Source for all but the efficiency indicator: “The Development of Result-Based Indicators for UNRWA’s Programmes Funded by the European Commission, November 2006”
**Source for efficiency indicator: “Guide to the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART),” Office of Management and Budget, March 2006.
ANNEX 3: 2011 INDICATORS AND TARGETS
UNRWA agrees to address and report to the United States on the following performance measures and targets for the current year. The reporting framework in Annex 3 may be reviewed during 2011 in an effort to align performance measures with those monitored and consolidated at an organizational level based on biennium plans. Reporting, as outlined herein, is requested by March 31, 2012 on efforts and results as of December 31, 2011. The below indicators are included in the draft Harmonized Donor Indicators Matrix dated November 26, 2010.
|
Program Sector |
Type of Indicator |
Indicator |
Baseline/Result |
2011 Target |
|
Health |
Outcome |
Improved detection rate of late complications among NCD patients |
11.5% (2009) |
12.2% |
|
Health |
Outcome |
Recovery rate of children with growth retardation. |
Prevalence rate in all fields: 39% (2009) |
54% |
|
Health |
Outcome |
Infant Mortality Rate (IMR): Live newborns dying under one year of age per one thousand live births |
22 (2009) |
|
|
Health |
Result |
Percentage of pregnant women who register for antenatal care in first trimester |
77% (2009) |
86% |
|
Health |
Result |
Average daily Medical consultations per doctor |
98.5 (2009) |
90 |
|
Health |
Outcome |
Percentage of late complications among non-communicable diseases (NCD) patients |
Rate in all fields: 11.5% (2009) |
12.2% |
|
Education |
Result |
Learner Dropouts – Elementary Education |
Male: .52% (2009) Female: .29% (2009) |
Male: .5% Female: .2% |
|
Education |
Result |
Learner Dropouts – Preparatory Education |
Male: 2.97% (2009) Female: 2.05% (2009) |
Male: 3% Female: 2.5% |
|
Education |
Result |
The Mean score obtained by Grade 4 students from MLA testing – Math and Arabic |
Math: 45.33% (2009) Arabic: 44.2% (2009) |
|
|
Education |
Result |
The Mean score obtained by Grade 8 students from MLA testing – Math and Arabic |
Math: 23.1% (2009) Arabic: 28.3% (2009) |
|
|
Education |
Result |
GFO Pass rates for Math and Arabic |
Math: 43.5% (2008/2009) Arabic: 61.3% (2008/2009) |
Math 75% Arabic: 85% |
|
Education |
Result |
Pass rates for Lebanon national preparatory exam |
50.4% (2008/2009) |
55% |
|
Education |
Result |
Percentage of Special Education Needs (SEN) children of all children enrolled |
New indicator; baseline to be established in 2011 |
|
|
Decent Standard of Living: Relief and Social Services |
Outcome |
Number of Social Safety Net (SSN) refugee families living in substandard shelters, which have improved living conditions. |
229 (2008) |
343 |
|
Relief and Social Services |
Outcome |
Percent Social Safety Net beneficiaries who are abject poor |
46% (2009) |
49% |
|
Relief and Social Services |
Outcome |
The Periodic review of social performance of the Microfinance program |
Completed social impact assessment for SFO and a social rating assessment of WBFO and GFO |
Social impact and rating assessments completed in all Microfinance program fields. |
|
Relief and Social Services |
Output |
Total number of loans financed to refugee clients through all MD loan products |
12,062 (2009) |
101,707 |
|
Relief and Social Services |
Outcome |
Technical and vocational training graduates employed after 12 months of graduation |
Male: 79% (2009) Female: 74% (2009) |
Male: 82% Female: 80% |
|
Human Rights Enjoyed to the Fullest |
Output |
Percentage of UNRWA schools implementing the Violence Free/Child Friendly Schools Program |
100% |
|
|
Relief and Social Services |
Outcome |
Percentage of new inscriptions meeting UNRWA standards. (e.g. registering newborns, marriages and deaths). |
94% (2009) |
97% |
|
Relief and Social Services |
Result |
Number of vulnerable refugees benefiting from CBO services/activities (i.e. Skills training for women and rehabilitation services for persons with disabilities) |
214,419 (2009) |
213,419 |
|
Emergency programme West Bank/ Gaza |
Result |
Percentage of daily caloric needs (2,100 kCals) met through UNRWA’s emergency food aid programme |
60% in Gaza, 27% in West Bank (2009) |
GFO: 61% WBFO: 27% |
|
Emergency program West Bank/Gaza |
Result |
Number of job days of employment created for poor families |
West Bank: 1,181,918 Gaza: 2,768,748 job days created (2009) |
WBFO: 2,215,200 GFO: 3,808,300 |
|
Process Monitoring: OD Program |
Result |
Biennium plans and budgets produced that are prioritized, evidence based, monitored periodically within the overall Medium Term Strategy (MTS) strategy |
2010-2011 MTS -based Resource allocation and Biennium Plans |
2012-2013 Resource allocation based on the MTS. |
|
Process Monitoring: OD Program |
Result |
UNRWA M&E system providing timely and accurate management and program information |
A functioning central M&E system is in place |
Reports used to monitor progress and to make programmatic decisions. |
|
Agency-wide GBV strategy |
Output |
Referral systems to detect and refer women victims of violence in all UNRWA fields. |
Two functional referral systems in the West Bank and Gaza |
Functional referral systems in all 5 fields. |
|
Agency policy on Human Rights, Conflict Resolution, and Tolerance Education |
Output |
The percentage of education staff that successfully completes the HRCRTE training program (The percentage of teachers trained in the revised HRCRTE toolkit). |
New indicator; baseline to be established in 2011 |
ANNEX 4: ACTIVITIES RELATED TO CONFORMANCE WITH FUNDING CONDITIONS IN SECTION 301(C)
|
Yes |
No |
Notes |
|
|
General |
|||
|
1. Agreement by the Agency to conform to, consistent with UN resolutions and rules, conditions on U.S. Contributions in framework and funding agreements with the U.S. Department of State. |
|||
|
2. Five meetings every six months between UNRWA and relevant State Department officials in which section 301(c)-related issues are discussed. |
|||
|
3. Written communication between UNRWA and relevant State Department officials on section 301(c)-related issues. |
|||
|
Neutrality of staff/personnel |
|||
|
4. UNRWA checks staff against UN1267 Sanctions Committee list once every six months. |
|||
|
5. Provision of lists of Agency staff members to host governments, the Palestinian Authority, Egypt and Israel on an annual basis and other UN member states upon request. |
|||
|
6. Communication to staff about appropriate behavior consistent with UNRWA's neutrality rules/regulations at least once per field every year. |
|||
|
7. Prompt initiation of investigations upon receipt of information about alleged staff/personnel misconduct. |
|||
|
8. Immediate efforts taken to seek information from authorities when staff are detained/convicted, etc. |
|||
|
Neutrality of beneficiaries |
|||
|
9. Checks of registered Palestine refugees against UN1267 Sanctions Committee list every six months. |
|||
|
10. Conduct of verifications and investigations, as appropriate, upon receipt of information about alleged beneficiary conduct of concern and denial of certain forms of service/benefits, when appropriate. |
|||
|
Neutrality of facilities |
|||
|
11. UNRWA Operations Support Officer programmes inspect each UNRWA facility in the West Bank, Gaza, and Lebanon at least once every six months to ensure appropriate use. |
|||
|
12. UNRWA immediately investigates incidents of misuse of facilities and takes immediate steps to assure non-recurrence, including, in appropriate cases, through seeking third party assistance. |
|||
|
Neutrality of contractors/vendors |
|||
|
13. Checks of all contractor and vendors against UN1267 Sanctions Committee list every six months. |
|||
|
14. Inclusion of all appropriate Agency neutrality clauses in Agency contracts. |
|||
|
15. Details of UNRWA contracts above $100,000 are made publicly available one month after the end of each quarter. |