| Report on Issues Related to the Aerial Eradication of Illicit Coca in Colombia -Report Home Page Released by the Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs December 2003 Environmental Management Plan for the Illicit Crop Eradication Program Using Aerial Spraying with the Herbicide Glyphosate (ICEPG)
SPRAYING OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 1. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION While executing aerial spraying operations using the mixture of this herbicide, some quite specific conditions may occur that may generate potential environmental and social impacts, from the very moment the airplane takes off until it lands. During the trajectory, it may even be necessary to dump the herbicide in flight to ensure the lives of the crew, due either to attacks by terrorists or to aircraft failure. The elimination of illicit crops in Colombia is justified because it hinders the negative impact related to the production and trafficking of narcotics and to the harm of deteriorating the environment. It also enables introducing new plant species aimed at extracting psychoactive substances. There are several available eradication methods (manual, mechanical, burning, biological, and chemical). However, taking into consideration the location of the illicit crop fields, the characteristics of the landscape, the opposition of the farmers who cultivate plants for illegal purposes, and the presence of outlawed armed groups, the most efficient and least dangerous strategy is aerial spraying with herbicides.
2. OBJECTIVES
3. ACTIVITIES TO BE CARRIED OUT 3.1. Prevention Measures
Maintenance, Checks, and Calibration Before every mission, the technical personnel at the National Police Anti-Narcotics Division (DIRAN is the Colombian acronym) operations base must check the operational condition of the spraying equipment, and if need be, adjust the equipment. DIRAN will keep a file of maintenance, check, and calibration reports.
3.2 Technical and Environmental Specifications in the Different ICEPG Phases The spraying process is carried out in three phases: detecting the illicit crops to be sprayed, spraying, and verification.
3.2.1. Detection Measures The purpose of the detection process is to identify, characterize, and locate the zones with illicit crops and the zones to be excluded from the programs, using geographical coordinates. Such characterization will be supported by satellite imagery, aerial photography, and cartography. The ARECI-DIRAN personnel will do the field work to carry out this activity and its main objective is to identify how the soil is used, the presence of settlements, and the delimitation of National Protected Area System zones, ecologically fragile zones and environmentally, socially, and economically sensitive zones, in order to create the basic environmental zoning for each operation. To do so, there must be strict compliance with 1991 Decree 1843 Article 87 referring to security zones and with Article 1, Paragraph 2 in National Anti-narcotics Commission Resolution 0013 dated June 27, 2003. The environmental zoning will be delivered, in accordance with the available cartography for operations already carried out and with the frequency stipulated by the Ministry of the Environment, Housing, and Territorial Development.
3.2.2. Spraying Measures For reasons of security and due to the location of and access to the fields with illicit crops, the spraying must be done using proper aircraft that comply with the parameters in Chart # 1. 3.2.2.1. Operational Parameters During the spraying operations, bear in mind all technical navigation and spraying requirements, in order to mitigate the potential impact of the spraying on vegetation or on neighboring crops not covered by the ICEPG. These parameters include flying altitude, the size of the drops, dosage, wind velocity, and other favorable weather conditions. The effect of the drift or side movement of some of the mixture being sprayed could be an inconvenience, considering the consequences that it may have on the ecological surroundings of the plants being sprayed; therefore, the ICEPG will be carried out under proper conditions (see Chart # 1).
Chart # 1
ILLICIT CROP ERADICATION PROGRAM USING AERIAL SPRAYING OPERATIONAL PARAMETERS
For this purpose, there must be strict compliance with 1991 Decree 1843 Article 102 that refers to the pilots’ obligations. Likewise, all other articles therein applicable to the program must be taken into account.
3.2.2.2. Other Factors to Bear in Mind during the Spraying Operations There are other factors that enable increasing the operational efficiency of aerial spraying using Glyphosate, without exceeding technical and economical thresholds; therefore, we recommend not spraying when:
3.2.3. Verification
The Eradication Program using aerial spraying with Glyphosate must be verified in order to evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of the environmental management measures.
In parallel with the verification activities directly related to the efficacy of the illicit crop spraying, an environmental evaluation must be made, for the purpose of qualitatively estimating its magnitude (light / moderate / severe). This will be done, bearing in mind:
The technical verification consists of the following activities:
3.2.3.1.1 Selecting the Areas to Be Acknowledged
The Verification Program must be carried out using a sample of illicit crop parcels that have been sprayed. The zones are the Putumayo-Caquetá, Guaviare-Meta, Cauca-Nariño, Antioquia, and Norte de Santander nuclei.
3.2.3.1.2. Selecting the Sample
The sampling unit will be the breadth of the passing selected, based on satellite localization records chosen at random. Also factors such as security in the zones to be sampled, operating costs, availability of equipment, and variability of the sample universe will be taken into account.
3.2.3.1.3. Selecting and Gathering Participants for the Verification Process
To determine a reliable, consensual estimate of the area effectively eradicated, each participating entity must appoint and assign its delegates.
Also, the Ministry of the Environment, Housing, and Territorial Development, the Ministry of Social Protection, the Colombian Farming and Livestock Institute, the National Attorney General’s Office, the National General Prosecutor’s Office, Plan Colombia, and other institutions that it is deemed relevant to summon may be invited to participate in the verification process, as observers. 3.2.3.1.4. Writing up the Final Report The results of the verification process must be submitted in a document containing:
4. FOLLOW-UP
DIRAN will be in charge of the follow-up on the different activities herein. Therefore, it must have the records of the results achieved in the spraying operations.
5. ENTITY IN CHARGE The National Police Anti-narcotics Division is in charge of carrying out the activities indicated herein. END OF THE SPECIFICATION INDUSTRIAL SAFETY PROGRAM ON THE OPERATIONS BASES 1. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
An industrial safety program is related to the proper handling of substances used for spraying illicit crops, fuels, lubricants, equipment, aircrafts, ground vehicles and machinery, as well as the occupational health care and industrial safety measures on the operations bases and in the air, whose improper performance may increase the vulnerability and cause accidents of any nature, including actions by outlawed armed groups, with the subsequent generation of effects on the environment and on people’s health.
Accidents lead to an increase of operation costs, supplementary costs (indemnities, compensations, repairs and replacements) associated with a negative program effect.
In order to carry out aerial spraying operations, it will be necessary to transport, store, load and dispose of farming chemical products, fuel, lubricants, and parts for the usage and maintenance of equipment, aircrafts and vehicles in the ICEPG on the operations bases; as well as the final disposal of debris, waste and packing materials.
Among the risks that may arise on the different operations bases, we name the following:
There are other activities that deserve industrial safety management, such as:
In order to ensure a proper total safety program, it is necessary to have the training plans for the operation base personnel. 2. OBJECTIVE To prevent, control and mitigate the adverse or undesired events related to the improper handling of farming chemicals, fuels, lubricants, equipment, aircrafts, ground vehicles and machinery.
3. ACTIVITIES TO BE CARRIED OUT 3.1. FARMING CHEMICAL PRODUCT MANAGEMENT For the storage, handling, application, transportation and disposal of debris and residues, apply the measures embodied in the norms in force in 1986 Resolution 2309, 1991 Law 430, 1991 Decree 1843 and the regulations that modify them, add to them or substitute them, as well as in applicable environmental standards. The specific activities are consigned in the National Police Anti-Narcotics Division instructions that address total safety measures for the operations base platforms.
3.2. RAW MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT 3.2.1 FUEL AND LUBRICANT MANAGEMENT For the storage, handling, application, transportation of fuels, lubricants and disposal of debris and residues, implement the measures embodied in the following Colombian technical standards 1899, 1417, 4643, 5011 and in the 2002 Regulation Decree 1609 and in the standards that modify it, add to it or substitute it and that are applicable to it, given the special characteristics of this program.
3.2.2 AIRCRAFT, GROUND VEHICLE, EQUIPMENT AND MACHINERY MANAGEMENT
For the operation and maintenance of aircrafts, ground vehicles, equipment and machinery available on the operations bases, follow the guidelines available at the National Police Anti-Narcotics Division and especially the instructions contained in the manufacturer’s operating manuals.
3.3. OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND INDUSTRIAL SAFETY MEASURES Follow the measures embodied in the National Police Occupational Health and Industrial Safety internal regulations, as well as the standards provided for in 1979 Law 9, Heading III – Occupational Health and the decrees that regulate it. Both the illicit crop eradication area and the police aviation area have their own instructions regarding total industrial safety and occupational health measures. 3.4 SIGNALLING The Operation Bases will be equipped with signaling for prevention, regulations, and information purposes, following industrial safety guidelines to prevent program-associated risks.
3.5. TRAINING 3.5.1 TRAINING FOR FARMING CHEMICAL PRODUCT MANAGEMENT Pursuant to the provisions in 1991 Decree 1843 Article 172 and following, all personnel working with pesticides must be trained once a year to ensure proper farming chemicals product management. DIRAN must keep the corresponding records of such training sessions, including topics covered, attendance sheet, duration, and training entity.
3.5.2 TRAINING ON OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND INDUSTRIAL SAFETY MEASURES DIRAN will forward a training program, according to the specific activities carried out by the personnel involved in the ICEPG, including the following topics:
DIRAN must keep the corresponding records of these training sessions, including topics covered, attendance sheet, duration, and training entity.
4. FOLLOW-UP DIRAN will be in charge of the follow-up on the different activities included herein. To do so, DIRAN must have the records of the results of the inspections and verifications, as follows:
The follow-up will be done on a monthly basis.
5. ENTITY IN CHARGE The National Police Anti-Narcotics Division is in charge of carrying out the activities herein.
END OF THE SPECIFICATION
INDUSTRIAL SAFETY PROGRAM ON THE OPERATIONS BASES
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFICATION # 3 1. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
Carrying out the activities proper to the National Police Anti-narcotics Division and the spraying operations using the herbicide mixture produces various types of solid waste:
2. OBJECTIVE To manage the solid waste on the bases where spraying is done and to establish mechanisms to prevent its impact on the environment.
3. ACTIVITIES TO BE CARRIED OUT 3.1. Domestic Solid Waste (DSW) Management Plan Because the program generates domestic solid waste on the bases where spraying is done, the regulation embodied in Decree 2104 dated July 26, 1983, through which solid waste management is regulated, will be applied. 3.2. Management of Special Solid Waste (SSW) and Solid Waste linked to Farming Chemical Management (ASW) Because the program generates special solid waste on the bases where spraying is done, including farming chemical containers, the regulation embodied in 1991 Act 430, in Decree 2104 dated July 26, 1983, in 1986 Resolution 2309 and in 1991 Decree 1843 issued by the Ministry of Health, through which solid waste management is regulated, must be obeyed. In addition to the above, instructions must be given to the personnel on the operations base for them to classify solid waste in its place of origin, in order to facilitate its management. An instructions booklet and environmental education workshops will complement the solid waste management program for the operators on the bases. Due to the low toxicity of the mixture used for the ICEPG, the empty recipients of the mixture can be used to collect garbage or for building barriers (trenches) on the military bases, provided they are completely washed and perforated, to avoid their being used to transport water or other materials for human consumption. With the above exceptions, they can be re-used by the same farming chemical manufacturing company.
4. FOLLOW-UP DIRAN will be in charge of the follow-up on the different activities included herein. To do so, it must have the records for each one of the activities:
Follow-up will be done every six (6) months.
5. ENTITY IN CHARGE The National Police Anti-narcotics Division will be in charge of carrying out the activates described herein. END OF SPECIFICATION
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OPERATIONS BASE WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM SPECIFICATION # 4
1. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION There are three (3) types of wastewater produced on a National Police Anti-narcotics Division operations base: Sewage: the product of satisfying individual and group domestic needs Industrial Wastewater: the product of washing the spraying devices of the aircraft, machinery, filling equipment, and of mixing and storing farming chemicals. This also includes water used to wash the facilities. In the wastewater from the general maintenance and washing of the facilities, we foresee a greater content of solids in suspension, detergents and, possibly, emulsified grease and oils. Rainwater: This goes to a collecting system and is evacuated from the operations base or is infiltrated into the ground. Rainwater full of sediments that it drags on the ground may contain total solids as well as solids in suspension. Some ICEPG areas of operation are located in airports or next to them; the airports are equipped with their own sewer system or the sewer systems are part of the municipal sewer systems. The measures for collecting and treating the wastewater established below only apply to the bases that do not have connections to public sewer system networks for emptying purposes.
2. OBJECTIVES 2.1. General Objective To prevent, control, and mitigate the possible impact associated with the production and disposal of wastewater.
2.2. Specific Objectives
3. ACTIVITIES TO BE CARRIED OUT
3.1. Wastewater Management Wastewater management will be handled, taking where the wastewater is produced into account:
No sewage is produced on mobile bases because the operations personnel do not stay inside these areas nor do these areas have cafeterias or lodgings.
On the fixed bases where there is no connection to the public sewer system, connection may be made to an alternate wastewater treatment system or at least to a septic tank with a grease trap or a membrane, which meets minimum waste disposal standards. The bases will have a fixed or mobile system for collecting and re-using industrial wastewater. See Annex. Precipitate solids produced in sewage treatment processes will be managed as domestic solid waste (DSW) and special solid waste (SSW), pursuant to the provisions in Specification # 3 regarding solid waste management. 3.1.1. Wastewater Treatment Sewage Treatment System The bases that produce sewage directly related to spraying operations will have treatment systems according to need; they will obey the allowable limits set forth in the regulations in force, and will ensure proper, permanent maintenance. Liquid Industrial Waste from Washing the Airplane Tanks (SLW) The industrial wastewater produced from washing the aircraft used to apply the mixture will be re-used in the spraying process. 3.1.2. Final Disposal Once the wastewater meets the conditions required at the emptying site, based on the use of the water in the receiving trench, it can be dumped, pursuant to the provisions in 1978 Decree 1541 and to 1984 Decree 1594. 3.2. Dumping Control
In order to establish basic sanitary parameters (DBO, DQO, total solids and solids in suspension, pH, total coliforms and faecal coliforms), a characterization aimed at proving the efficiency of the domestic wastewater treatment system and compliance with regulations must be made.
A wastewater dumping analysis must be made once every six (6) months or at least once during the operation on bases that operate for less than six months, in order to establish that the emptying was limited to the provisions set forth in 1984 Decree 1594 regarding the use of wastewater and liquid waste. The wastewater treatment system will be located where it will not lead to the contamination of any well, spring or other source of water supply. In addition, it will be located in a place that has the slope specified for evacuating the treated wastewater. The location must have the proper terrain and must be easily accessible. The bases where wastewater is emptied into systems other than municipal sewer systems will obtain permits and keep them effective. 3.3. Training Training and educational programs will be given to those who operate the treatment system for the wastewater plants and for the re-use of industrial wastewater, in order to guarantee their proper maintenance and operation. 4. FOLLOW-UP
DIRAN will be in charge of the follow-up on the different activities included herein. To do so, it must have the records of the results achieved in each one of these activities, as follows:
Follow-up will be done every six (6) months.
Implementing the measures included in this program will be subject to the budget assignments that the National Government allots for this purpose.
5. ENTITY IN CHARGE The National Police Anti-narcotics Division is in charge of carrying out the activities indicated herein. END OF THE SPECIFICATION ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM 1. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION Although the scientific studies available show that there are is no significant impact from applying Glyphosate on the soil, water, and plant components that surround the illicit crops being sprayed, it is necessary to carry out follow-up and verification actions regarding the effectiveness of the spraying operations and the estimation of the possible impact on the environmental components. This technical follow-up will be done on parcels that meet the following criteria:
2. OBJECTIVES
3. ACTIVITIES TO BE CARRIED OUT
3.1. Plant Succession Analysis To become familiar with the plant succession process, a qualitative regeneration characterization (percentage of vegetation layers) will be done before and after each spraying, using videos, digital photography, and satellite imagery. In zones where there is no access either due to public order problems or to topographical conditions, available images will be used in order to determine any change in the vegetation layers. To do this analysis, the following specifications must be borne in mind: Size
The parcel to be evaluated will be geo-referenced and will have a minimum area of one hectare.
Number A total of two (2) parcels will be analyzed regarding vegetation layers, for each ICEPG target nucleus:
Periodocity
Verification must be done before the spraying, immediately thereafter, at 60 days and, if justified, at 90 and at 180 days. To forward the environmental monitoring of the spraying operations on poppy crops, aerial monitoring will be done, given the topographical, meteorological, public order, and typical logistic support conditions in these zones. 3.2 Glyphosate and MPAA Residue Analysis To determine the behavior of the Glyphosate and its metabolite MPAA residues, samples will be taken from the same parcels, in compliance with the ICA-approved protocol for soil and water sample-taking, in accordance with the studies required to obey the provisions in 2003 Resolution # 0099. Size The parcel to be evaluated will be geo-referenced and will have a minimum area of one hectare. Number A total of two (2) parcels will be analyzed regarding vegetation layers, for each ICEPG target nucleus. For soils, a compound sample will be made up of minimum three (3) samples taken from each parcel. For bodies of water, a compound sample will be made up of minimum two (2) samples taken from each parcel.
Periodicity
In each parcel selected, a compound sampling will be used taken from the first 20 cm. of horizon A, before the spraying, immediately thereafter, at 60 days and, if justified, at 90 and at 180 days. Indicators For the purpose of understanding the dynamics of Glyphosate and its metabolite MPAA and their effect on the physiochemical and biological properties of soil and water, we intend to evaluate the impact that the application has, by comparing the parcels from which the samples were taken, sprayed and not sprayed. The following parameters will be measured through laboratory analysis:
Soil: pH, Cationic Interchange Capacity (CIC), relation of interchangeable bases, nitrification (nitrates, ammonia and nitrites), percentage of organic matter, texture, concentration of Glyphosate and AMPA, new count of bacteria, actinomycetic fungus and nitrogen fixative, phosphate solubilizers, total phosphorous and available phosphorous. Water: Concentration of Glyphosate and AMPA, pH, electrical conductivity, temperature, dissolved oxygen, chemical oxygen demand, nitrification (nitrates, nitrites and ammonia), dissolved phosphate, magnesium, and calcium. Vegetation Layer. The indicator will be a percentage estimate of the area with new vegetation. 4. FOLLOW-UP In coordination with the entities involved, DIRAN will ensure compliance of the work schedule established to carry out the proposed activities and to send the samples to the Agustín Codazzi Geographical Institute (IGAC is the Colombian acronym) Soil Laboratory and to the National Health Institute (INS is the Colombian acronym) National Referencing Laboratory . 5. ENTITIES IN CHARGE Plant Succession Analysis
Glyphosate and MPAA Residue Analysis
END OF THE SPECIFICATION
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM COMMUNICATION AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
SPECIFICATION # 6 1. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION The development of a program of the nature of the ICEPG implies a series of interactions with the communities in the program target zones, either to inform them of its characteristics, results or progress or to solve the concerns that they may have regarding said program. 2. OBJECTIVES To develop a set of prevention, training and information activities aimed at the national, regional and local environment, as well as to the communities regarding the ICEPG nature and scope, its results and its risks, and regarding the environmental protection measures involved in the EMP.
3. ACTIVITIES TO BE CARRIED OUT
The Communication and Social Management Program has four (4) strategies: communication, training, inter-institutional coordination and complaint handling.
3.1. Communication Through a communication strategy, keep the society and the community at large informed nationally, regionally and locally, especially the communities located in the areas of influence of the Glyphosate spraying nuclei, regarding aspects, such as:
This information must be disseminated through media such as web pages, bulletins, publications, campaigns, among others.
3.2. Training The training will be aimed at institutional officials involved in the program, ICEPG technical and operational personnel, health care authorities, among others, and will be related to the Environmental Management Plan. See training aspects in Specifications # 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, and 8.
To develop this strategy, prepare a Training Plan with the different topics to be addressed in the EMP, the workshop date, the technical, financial and human resources required, the entities in charge, the number of persons to be trained, the workshop evaluation and follow-up. The DNE will require this Plan in order to consolidate it into one sole document.
3.3. Inter-institutional Coordination The Illicit Crop Eradication Program using Aerial Spraying with Glyphosate (ICEPG) is a strategy that the Colombian State uses to reduce the supply of illicit drugs. To carry out the activities included in the ICEPG and in its Environmental Management Plan, we boast, at a national level, the participation and commitment of the different institutions involved in the ICEPG, which have direct responsibility, pursuant to the provisions in the National Narcotics Council Resolution 0013 dated June 27, 2003, and to the specifications in this plan. The purpose of this coordination is to ensure compliance with the activities contained in the EMP. In order to carry out these actions, we may establish inter-institutional covenants with technical, public and private organizations who can support the ICEPG. 3.4. Complaint Handling The entities in charge in the ICEPG will design and execute the most proper mechanisms to handle the complaints for affectations that may have been caused as a result of the Program. 3.4.1. Farming and Livestock Activities Complaints of affectations that may have been caused by working with legal crops not mixed with or that are rotated with illicit crops will be handled pursuant to the provisions in Resolution 0017 dated October 4, 2001 or in any other regulation that modifies it, adds to it or substitutes it. 3.4.2. Environmental Management Should there be possible damage to zones in the National Natural Park Systems or other forest zones or State-owned natural zones, the Environmental Authority (Regional Autonomous Corporations) or the Natural National Park Special Administrative Unit (UAESPNN is the Colombian acronym) will present the complaints to DIRAN, who must handle said complaints pursuant to the standards in force regarding administrative actions. 3.4.3. Health Care Management The possible complaints that may arise for alleged health affectations will be handled pursuant to the mechanisms set forth in the General Health Social Security System described in Specification # 7. 4. FOLLOW-UP On a monthly basis, DNE will verify the progress status of the scheduled activities vs. the activities carried out for each strategy defined herein. Each entity committed to the implementation of strategies will appoint one delegate who will be in charge of all coordination with DNE.
5. ENTITY IN CHARGE DNE is responsible for coordinating the implementation of the strategies provided for herein. END OF THE SPECIFICATION PUBLIC HEALTH PROGRAM
SPECIFICATION # 7 1. ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION This program describes the set of activities and procedures aimed at the prevention, mitigation, correction, and compensation of risk situations for the health of the population in the ICEPG application zones. 2. OBJECTIVES 2.1. General Objective
To develop risk management measures for the prevention, mitigation, correction, and compensation of the effects on health that may be associated with spraying using Glyphosate in the ICEPG operations zones. 2.2. Specific Objectives
3. STRATEGIES AND ACTIVITIES
The strategies to be developed are related to information, care, and evaluation regarding health complaints. 3.1. DETERMINING THE HUMAN HEALTH RISK PANORAMA The Ministry of Social Protection will create the Panorama for Risks to Human Health, which may be caused by exposure to the mixture used in the ICEPG. Based on medical and scientific literature, medical histories and risk levels as well as foreseeable adverse effects can be described. Using that panorama, the scope and development of the other activities included herein based on the occurrence of each risk will be established and specific measures to eliminate or effectively control the provoked adverse effect will be prepared.
3.2. INFORMATION FOR PREVENTING EXPOSURE AND ACCIDENTS CAUSED BY ILLICIT CROPS AND THEIR ERADICATION Within the general framework to develop the information, education, and communication strategy, there will be workshops and training sessions on the contents of the ICEPG Environmental Management Plan and its components. The training will be aimed at institutional officials who participate in the program, ICEPG technical and operational personnel, and administration, health, and environmental authorities in the municipalities involved.
The specific information actions to which this component refers are aimed at the communities in the areas of influence of the zones in which the ICEPG intervenes, in order to reduce risks of exposure to pesticides and to induce the demand for timely medical care for the diagnosis and management of possible accidents with pesticides. Such activities will be permanently carried out in all of the zones scheduled in the ICEPG, with certain priority before the spraying occurs and during the period immediately after the spraying. The activities include the following:
The local health and environmental authorities will be in charge of carrying out the above-mentioned activities, using the guidelines and technical assistance of provincial department and national level authorities.
3.3. HEALTH CARE FOR AFFECTATIONS RELATED TO ILLICIT CROPS AND THEIR ERADICATION The actions aimed at guaranteeing timely, proper attention to possible risk situations or affectations effects to the population’s health include:
The training programs are:
a) Training Municipal and Provincial Department Health Team Personnel
The purpose of the health division personnel training contents and methodologies will be to contribute to strengthening the capacity of municipal and provincial department management for the prevention, supervision, and control of problems caused by pesticides, including those that may be produced as a result of spraying in the ICEPG. b) Training Medical / Health Care Service Personnel
The objective here is to improve the capacity to detect, diagnose, and clinically manage cases of exposure and intoxications caused by pesticides. To do so, the Ministry of Social Protection will prepare health care manuals and guidebooks. c) Training Environmental Health Technical Personnel
The purpose of training this type of personnel is to develop their skills in identifying, monitoring, and controlling circumstances of risk to the population, associated with the use and management of pesticides, as well as to develop their abilities to investigate cases within the public health supervision process and community education for preventing and controlling risks at a domestic level. To do so, the Ministry of Social Protection will prepare care manuals and guidebooks. d) Educating Personnel from Other Entities and the Community at Large
The Territorial Health Divisions will carry out information and education activities aimed at personnel in other sectors and the community at large, regarding the risks and potential effects of pesticides, as well as general prevention, supervision, and control measures. To do so, the Ministry of Social Protection will design proper educational material. The objective of this activity will be to encourage the participation and integration of persons and institutions to supervise and control problems related to the use and handling of and management of pesticides. Special emphasis will be given to coordination with the ICA Regional Offices, the Regional Autonomous Corporations, SENA, the UMATAS, and Municipal Ombudsmen’s Offices. e) Training the Operational Personnel Who Work with the Mixture Being Sprayed Regarding this topic, the Territorial Health Divisions will support the training processes carried out by the entities in charge of guaranteeing the safety and industrial hygiene of the operations base operators, pilots, and personnel. In all cases, the provisions set forth in 1991 Decree 1843 regarding the use and handling of pesticides, especially those in Chapters IX, X, XIII, and XIV (see reference in the contents of Specification # 2) will be obeyed. f) Establishing and Institutionalizing a Standard Protocol for Attending Patients
The General Health Social Security System will attend alleged events of exposure in accordance with its normal procedures and it will determine if there is a cause and effect relationship between the exposure to the sprayed mixture and the condition of the patient under study, pursuant to the protocol set forth by the Ministry of Social Protection. To do so, a standardized protocol will be established and institutionalized to attend patients who have symptoms that make us suspect exposure or who have symptoms compatible with intoxication caused by pesticides. The protocol will include the following procedures:
3.4. EVALUATION OF COMPLAINTS REGARDING AFFECTED HEALTH Health entities are responsible for establishing a possible cause and effect relationship between affected health and the Glyphosate used in the ICEPG. To do so, they have medical professionals duly trained to evaluate each case and pronounce a decision, pursuant to the protocol that the national health authority defines to evaluate and determine the possible damage to people’s health related to Glyphosate. The evaluation will be made maximum ten (10) days after the alleged exposure to the herbicide.
All health complaints received or remitted to entities other than health care service centers or to public health supervision units will be immediately referred to the above-mentioned health agencies set up in each territorial agency, to proceed with the medical evaluation and determine possible relations between the medical situation that motivated the consultation and exposure to Glyphosate and other related substances. Along those lines, information must be given to the persons involved as well as to the authorities and officials of the distinct agencies, for said evaluation to be done in a timely manner. At any time, both entities that receive health complaints and the population at large may demand that health organizations make an evaluation of the health condition of persons who file complaints or who accede to services for consultation when they suspect the existence of physical signs and symptoms that they believe are associated with pesticides. 4. FOLLOW-UP Follow-up will be done on a monthly basis to check scheduled activities against activities carried out. The Ministry of Social Protection General Director’s Office will be the entity that will do the plan follow-up and monitoring. 5. ENTITY IN CHARGE At the national level, the Ministry of Social Protection and the National Health Institute will be in charge of the health component; at the provincial department, district and municipal levels, the Territorial Health Divisions will be in charge. END OF THE SPECIFICATION
CONTINGENCY PLAN
SPECIFICATION # 8 INTRODUCTION
Given the fact that the illicit crop eradication program sprays using Glyphosate, a broad spectrum herbicide, and, although the environmental risk evaluation reported the high degradability of Glyphosate in the different environmental surroundings, the operation of the program itself is subjected to several risk factors (outlawed armed groups, aircraft mechanical failures, environmental aspects, to name a few), which endanger human lives and the natural environment when, due to these facts, it is necessary to immediately dump all of spraying product. The Contingency Plan (CP) is a document that provides response strategies to attend the emergencies that may arise during the different stages of Glyphosate handling, for the purpose of illicit crop eradication (transportation, storage, handling and spraying). Among the possible events that may occur, we include dumping (immediately dumping all of the Glyphosate from the aircraft), which action, in the oil sector, would correspond to spillage. For all events analyzed, we have established the responsible parties to be in charge of the CP operation as well as the mechanisms to supply basic information on the possibly affected areas. Likewise, we have established action procedures that must be followed when facing each type of situation, the parties to whom to request support, the equipment and production factors that would be required for each action. By creating the illicit crop eradication program contingency plan, the Anti-Narcotics Police aims not only to respond in a timely manner to the contingencies that arise from the operation, but also to follow the National Total Emergency Attention Policy, with the support and participation of the different government entities and institutions, each one handling its portion, based on its mission and objectives.
1. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS The Contingency Plan (CP) is a set of activities and operations that must be planned and carried out, in order to anticipate, prevent and / or correct any eventuality that may arise due to operating, natural or exogenous failures, and that may cause some type of negative impact on people, their assets or on the environment. The CP also seeks to:
2. CONTINGENCY PLAN STRUCTURE
The Contingency Plan is basically comprised of a Strategic Plan, an Operating Plan and a Database, with the following basic components:
2.1 STRATEGIC PLAN The purpose of the strategic plan is for each responsible person or entity to clearly know its functions and responsibilities within the plan, to perform the functions assigned and to efficiently use the resources available to take care of emergencies. The Contingency Plan covers the spraying program operations zones. Therefore, the National Police Anti-narcotics Division bases will have the equipment, mechanisms and personnel trained to handle possible incidents or accidents related to the aerial spraying processes. Within the specific ICEPG implementation zones, the following have been defined as priority action zones within the Contingency Plan:
These zones were determined according to spraying operation characteristics and to existing threats and risks to carrying out such operations.
The CP structure is mainly based on the creation of a Permanent Emergency Committee (PCE is the Colombian acronym) for each base, responsible for the following activities:
BASE PERMANENT EMERGENCY COMMITTEE (PEC)
OPERATING PLAN
This is the part of the CP where emergency procedures are established to enable rapid mobilization of human and technical resources, to start up the immediate response actions established.
The Coordination Centers for activating the Contingency Plan will be the National Police Anti-Narcotics Division spraying bases, where the required equipment is available for communication between the disaster attention team and the operations center. The purpose of this plan is to establish the basic procedures of the Contingency Plan operation. It also defines notification, organization and operation principles and mechanisms.
Below we list the procedures or protocols to be followed in each Operating Plan component: 2.2.1 Prevention and Control Measures On the operations base:
2.2.2 Communication with the Internal Support Group The existing communication systems must be used to inform all personnel on the base of the emergency at hand for them to immediately arrive and give the pertinent recommendations. 2.2.3 Communication with External Support Entities When the internal groups cannot control the contingency, the Spraying Operations Commander will contact the existing external entities specialized in emergency attention to inform them of the type of emergency at hand, and to request their immediate arrival and support. The Spraying Operations Commander will coordinate the actions with the internal and external support groups to respond to the emergency. In the case of dumping, the Spraying Operations Commander will report and coordinate the necessary support with the different pertinent entities. The Spraying Operations Commander will prepare an initial dumping report that will contain the basic information regarding the specific circumstances (where, when, and how), in order to preliminary estimate the magnitude and severity of the event. For initial notification purposes, Form # 1 “INITIAL REPORT” will be used, (see Annex), taken from the National Contingency Plan and customized to the spraying program operation conditions. 2.2.4 Alarm Activation In case of emergency, the Spraying Operations Commander must trigger the emergency alarm. If there is any other person in the emergency room, this person must immediately inform the Spraying Operations Commander for him / her to trigger the alarm. Once the corrective actions are initiated, the Spraying Operations Commander may order the alarm deactivation. To activate the CP, we will take the customized levels from the National Contingencies Plan. 2.2.5 Contingency Plan Activation Once the emergency is reported, the Spraying Operations Commander will proceed to:
The CP activation may have different levels, according to the characteristics of the emergency: Level 1: Partial CP Activation in Alert Mode In this type of event, the Program will take measures aimed at controlling the situation, by activating its maximum operating response level for attending the event, maximum three (3) hours after activation. Level 2: Program CP Activation by Requesting Support to the Operating Committees
TABLE 1. CP ACTIVATION LEVELS, OBTAINED AND EDITED FROM THE NATIONAL CONTINGENCY PLAN
Level 3: Instantaneous Total CP Activation. Disaster – Highest Volume and Severity, within the Local CP Coverage Area The event is totally out of the program operation area control, and exceeds the capacity of the requested local or regional assistance systems. National level agencies are required to organize the actions. This level will be developed if the event exceeds the level 2 operations capacities 48 hours after its occurrence, for which it will have the support of national level agencies. 2.2.6 Priority Criteria in the Response Operations The highest priority is to protect and preserve the lives of persons threatened by the incident. When there are resource and time limitations, it will be necessary to first protect the resources that are most valuable and important for the security and welfare of the base personnel and of the population in the surrounding area. Next, we will protect resources with a high ecological value and the greatest sensitivity, such as primary and secondary woodlands with native vegetation, in order to ensure sustainability of the ecosystems. And last, we will protect socio-economically and ecologically threatened resources that have a risk indicator of medium or low, such as legal crops or brush. If we have to select between protecting two threatened resources of high value to the community, but with different risk indicators, priority will be given to the most sensitive one. If there are two resources with equal risk value, we will opt to protect the resource that, if affected, would cause greater socioeconomic impact on the human population at a short or mid term. If any of the above-mentioned measures cannot be applied, we will proceed to do emergency dumping at an altitude of 5,000 feet, and to do follow-up on the area if the public order conditions so permit; otherwise, we will notify the pertinent entities to do follow-up on the possible effects. 2.2.7 Operational Procedures or Response Protocols 2.2.7.1 Evacuation and Assistance in the Event of Fire or Explosion on the Base due to Failures of an Operational Nature Once the Spraying Operations Commander activates the alarm in the event of fire or explosion for failures of an operational nature, all base personnel must follow the recommendations below.
After the evacuation:
2.2.7.2 Fuel and Glyphosate Spills
a. Spills for Tank Truck Turn Over during Transportation The following procedure will be delivered to the transportation entity contracted for transporting farming chemicals.
b. Glyphosate and Fuel Spilling on the Base
2.2.7.4 Fire and Explosion Control on the Base due to Operational Failures
2.2.7.5 Attacks against the Base
2.2.7.6 Response Procedure for Attending Disasters during Spraying
a. Primary Incident Report. The aircraft pilot must report the events right after they occur. It is possible that the pilot not report the incident immediately after the event occurs, due to damages that may affect the aircraft communication systems or to the pilot’s not detecting the incident in a timely manner or if the incident ended up in a fatality (aircraft accident). When the incident is detected and the communication systems have not been affected, the pilot must immediately report to the base, specifically to the Spraying Operations Commander, who verifies the pilot’s integrity and, along with him/her, makes a primary or initial evaluation of the damage.
When the aircraft has suffered an incident, no matter if the incident is of low, medium or high severity, it must return to the base. Prior to returning to the base, the pilot and the Spraying Operations Commander, after having evaluated the incident, establish the need to dump the product, based on the following order of importance:
The incidents in the illicit crop eradication process will be classified according to the following criteria:
Low Severity Incident. We include incidents where the safety of the aircraft and, therefore, the pilot’s safety are not seriously endangered. In this type of incident, no product dumping is considered. In this case, the aircraft suspends the operation and immediately returns to the base. Medium Severity Incident. The pilot has operational and airworthiness capacity that enables him / her to evaluate the zone for product dumping. Priority is given to pre-established zones in the spraying zone characterization. The pilot immediately returns to the base after dumping the product. High Severity Incident. This is an event of great risk, where the pilot lacks sufficient airworthiness to select the spot to dump in, thus he/she has to dump the product immediately and return to the base. Fatal Severity Incident. These are incidents where the final result is fatal; they usually end up in the aircraft being shot down. The follow-up on the operation as described in the CP is established within the environmental monitoring program. b. Response Team Activation. This operating level relates to all activities carried out to activate the emergency attention group during the spraying process. Among them is the reconfirmation of the exact place of the incident, the security study of the area in which the incident occurred, going to the area, the evaluation of the need of taking corrective measures or not, and dumping, if required. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||