printable banner
Foreign Relations, 1969-1976, Volume E-6, Documents on Africa, 1973-1976


Released by the Office of the Historian
173. Telegram 160682 From the Department of State to the Embassy in Kenya, July 24, 1974, 2025Z

CONFIDENTIAL

EXDIS

 

CONFIDENTIAL

 

PAGE 01  STATE  160682

 

61

ORIGIN SS-30

 

INFO  OCT-01  ISO-00  SSO-00  NSCE-00  /031 R

 

O R 242025Z JUL 74

FM SECSTATE WASHDC

TO AMEMBASSY NAIROBI IMMEDIATE

INFO AMEMBASSY ADDIS ABABA

AMEMBASSY DAR ES SALAAM

AMEMBASSY LONDON

AMEMBASSY MOSCOW

AMEMBASSY MOGADISCIO

AMEMBASSY PARIS

USCINCEUR

 

C O N F I D E N T I A L STATE 160682

 

EXDIS

 

E.O. 11652:  GDS

TAGS: PFOR, MASS, KE, US

SUBJECT:RESPONSE TO ANTICIPATED KENYA REQUEST FOR U.S.ARMS

 

REF: (A) NAIROBI 6028 (NOTAL); (B) NAIROBI 6121(NOTAL);

(C) MOGADISCIO 1138 (NOTAL)

 

1.  DEPT AND DOD BELIEVE THAT DOLS. 40 MILLION CONGRESSION-

AL CEILING ON MILITARY EQUIPMENT THAT CAN BE PROVIDED TO

AFRICA IS LIKELY TO PRECLUDE CONSIDERATION OF MAP GRANTS

OR FMS CREDIT DURING FY 1975 UNLESS PRESIDENTIAL AUTHORITY

TO WAIVE CEILING IS RESTORED AS PROPOSED IN LEGISLATION

CONFIDENTIAL

 

CONFIDENTIAL

 

PAGE 02  STATE  160682

 

SUBMITTED BY THE ADMINISTRATION.  AS A PRACTICAL MATTER,

HOWEVER, EVEN IF WAIVER AUTHORITY IS RESTORED, FLEXIBILITY

ALSO CONSTRAINED BY LIMITED FUNDS EXPECTED TO BE AVAILABLE,

EXISTING PROGRAMS, AND PRIORITIES.  ALSO, AVAILABILITY OF

CREDIT FUNDS NORMALLY NOT KNOWN UNTIL LATE IN THE FISCAL

YEAR.  QUESTION OF FUTURE CREDIT PROGRAMS FOR ALL AFRICAN

COUNTRIES IS SUBJECT HIGH LEVEL OVER-ALL REVIEW OF AFRICAN

ARMS POLICY.

 

2.  ON QUESTION OF FMS CASH SALES, DEPARTMENT IS INCLUDING

KENYA IN PENDING PROPOSAL FOR PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATION

THAT SEVEN ADDITIONAL COUNTRIES BE MADE ELIGIBLE FOR FMS

CASH SALES.  SUBMISSION THIS PROPOSAL TO WHITE HOUSE BEING

EXPEDITED.

3.  EXIM BANK IS FORBIDDEN BY LAW TO FINANCE ARMS SALES

TO LDCS.  WHILE PRIVATE COMMERCIAL CREDIT MAY SOMETIMES

BE ARRANGED BY US MANUFACTURERS, ITEMS MENTIONED REFTEL

(A) ARE LIKELY TO BE EQUIPPED WITH GOVERNMENT FURNISHED

EQUIPMENT (GFE) AND, THEREFORE, REQUIRE FMS CASH SALES

ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION BY PRESIDENT.  IF ITEMS DID NOT

CONTAIN GFE, EXPORT LICENSE MIGHT BE APPROVED FOR

COMMERCIAL SALE.  DEFINITE JUDGMENT CANNOT BE RENDERED

WITHOUT COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS BOUGHT.

 

4.  IN VIEW OF ABOVE, SHOULD KENYATTA APPROACH YOU ON

QUESTION MILITARY ASSISTANCE, YOU SHOULD REPLY THAT WHILE

USG IS SYMPATHETIC TO KENYAN PERCEPTION OF NEED THE USG

OPERATES UNDER SEVERE CONGRESSIONAL AND FISCAL RESTRAINTS

IN THIS FIELD.  YOU SHOULD DESCRIBE THESE RESTRAINTS

BUT ADD THAT YOU WILL NONETHELESS PROMPTLY FORWARD HIS

REQUEST TO THE DEPARTMENT FOR CONSIDERATION.

 

5.  GENERAL APPROACH YOU SUGGEST IN PARAS 4 AND 5 REFTEL

(A) HAS POTENTIAL MERIT AND WE BELIEVE IT MIGHT APPEAL TO

KENYATTA FOR HIM TO BECOME THE SPOKESMAN FOR A JOINT,

MORE RESTRAINED APPROACH BY THE GOVERNMENTS IN EAST AFRICA

TO ARMS ACQUISITION PROGRAMS.  IF YOU MAKE SUCH AN

APPROACH, YOU SHOULD POINT OUT SOURCE OF THE PROBLEM,

I.E., SUBSTANTIAL ARMS DELIVERIES TO THE AREA BY

SOVIETS, EAST BLOC, AND PRC HAVE INCLUDED MOST MODERN

AND SOPHISTICATED WEAPONS SYSTEMS.  KENYA'S CONCERNS FOR

CONFIDENTIAL

 

CONFIDENTIAL

 

PAGE 03  STATE  160682

 

ITS OWN SECURITY, THEREFORE, ARE FULLY UNDERSTOOD BY US.

IF ALL CONCERNED IN EAST AFRICA COULD BE BROUGHT TO UNDER-

STAND THE POTENTIAL COST IN BOTH ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL

TERMS OF ARMS RACES, COMPETITION, IT COULD BENEFIT ALL.

GIVEN THE DEVELOPMENTS OF PAST SEVERAL YEARS, HOWEVER,

IT IS NOT COUNTRIES WHO HAVE MAINTAINED FULL NON-ALIGNED

STATUS OR EVEN THOSE WHO HAVE MAINTAINED CLOSE RELATION-

SHIPS WITH WEST WHICH HAVE BEEN IN VANGUARD OF THE

AFRICAN STATES UNDERTAKING MAJOR ARMS ACQUISITIONS BUT

RATHER SOVIET AND PRC CLIENTS.

 

6.  FYI ONLY.  YOU SHOULD ALSO BE AWARE THAT USG NOW

RESPONDING TO URGENT ETHIOPIAN ARMS REQUESTS WITH INCREASE

IN FMS CREDITS, EXPEDITED DELIVERY OF PROGRAMMED MAP

EQUIPMENT AND AUTHORIZATION OF INCREASED CASH SALES.  SUCH

INITIATIVE AS THE ONE YOU PROPOSE WOULD HAVE TO AVOID

BEING CONTRADICTORY TO OUR PRESENT EFFORTS ON BEHALF OF

ETHIOPIA.  PROBABLY ANY SELF IMPOSED LIMITATION ONARMS

SUPPLIES TO THE HORN COULD ONLY COME INTO EFFECT AFTER

KENYA AND ETHIOPIA HAVE SATISFIED THEMSELVES THEY HAVE

OVERCOME THE DISADVANTAGES THEY NOW FEEL VIS-A-VIS THEIR

NEIGHBORS.  END FYI.   KISSINGER

 

 

CONFIDENTIAL

Return to This Volume Home Page