printable banner
Foreign Relations, 1969-1976, Volume E-6, Documents on Africa, 1973-1976


Released by the Office of the Historian
175. Telegram 24342 From the Department of State to the Embassies in Kenya and the United Kingdom, February 3, 1975, 2120Z
   

TELEGRAM
Department of State 24324

P R 032120Z FEB 73

FM SECSTATE WASDC

TO RUOMNI/AMEMBASSY NAIROBI PRIORITY 9144
RUDIC/AMEMBASST LONDON PRIORITY 4332

INFO RUQMAB/AMEMBASSY ADDIS ABABA 5846
RUTAAM/AMEMBASSY DAR ES SALAAM 2056
BT

E.O. 11632: GDS

TAGS: MARR, MASS, PFOR, ME, US

SUBJECT: KENYAN REQUEST FOR US MILITARY TRAINING AND ASSISTANCE

REF: (A) NAIROBI 741: (B) NAIROBI 199; (C) NAIROBI 10265; (D) NAIROBI 10618

1. STATE AND DOD BELIEVE THAT FAVORABLE RESPONSE TO KENYAN REQUEST IS IN USG'S BEST INTEREST. TO THAT END, SECRETARY HAS MADE DECISION TO PROCEED WITH FOLLOWING ACTIONS:

A) DOD ID DRAWING UP AN IN-CONTINENTAL U.S. MAP TRAINING PROGRAM BEGINNING IN FY 73 PROJECTED TO HAVE AN ANNUAL VALUE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF DOLS. 30,000. SIMUTANEOUSLY DEPT. IS PREPARING REQUEST FOR PRESIDENTIAL DETERMINATIONS NEEDED TO AUTHORIZE THE FMS CREDIT AND MAP TRAINING IN FY 73 FOR KENYA.

B) FOR LONDON: EMBASSY IS REQUESTED TO INFORM FCO, AND IF APPROPRIATE MOD, OF KENYAN RQUEST FOR US MILITARY ASSISTANCE AND OF OUR INTENTION TO BE FORTHCOMING. EMBASSY SHOULD STRESS THAT WE RECOGNIZE AND SUPPORT BRITAINS'S TRADITIONAL ROLE AS MAJOR SUPPLIER TO KENYA OF MILITARY TRAINING AND EQUIPMENT. WE HAVE NO WISH TO SUPPLANT BRITAIN IN THIS RELATIONSHIP BUT, GIVEN MUCH LARGER GOK MILITARY REQUIREMENTS AND GOK'S DIRECT APPROACH TO US FOR ASSISTANCE, WE FEEL THAT IT IS IN JOINT INTERESTS OF US AND UK TO BE RESPONSIVE. WE WISH TO DEVELOP OUR PROGRAM IN A FRAMEWORK OF FULL CONSULTATION AND COORDINATION WITH THE BRITISH. IN THIS CON- NECTION IT WOULD BE MOST HELPFUL IF BRITISH WOULD PROVIDE US WITH A COPY, OR ALTERNATIVELY A COMPLETE RUN- DOWN, OF THEIR CURRENT INTENTIONS TOWARD FILLING THESE NEEDS.

C) FYI ONLY: EMBASSY TEHRAN IS BEING REQUESTED IN SEPTEL TO QUERY GOI ABOUT THE AVAILABILITY AND COST OF IRANIAN F5A'S, WHICH THE GOI HAS INDICATED MAY BE SURPLUS TO ITS NEEDS), AND TO DISCUSS IN GENERAL TERMS OUR PROPOSALS FOR KENYA. THIS INITIATIVE SHOULD NOT REPEAT NOT BE DIS- CUSSED WITH THE KNEYANS OR THE BRITISH UNTIL WE HAVE MORE INFORMATION ON POSSIBLITY OF OBTAINING F5-A'S. END FYI ONLY.

2. FOR NAIROBI: EMBASSY IS HEREBY AUTHORIZED TO INFORM GOK OF USG DESIRE TO BE RESPONSIVE TO KENYA'S REQUEST FOR MILITARY ASSISTANCE WITHIN APPLICABLE LEGISLATIVE, APPROPRIATIONS AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONSTRAINTS. WE HAVE INITIATED CERTAIN REQUISITE INTERNAL ACTIONS TO PERMIT GREATER FLEXIBLITY OF RESPONSE. ALTHOUGH NOT YET IN A POSITION TO TALK SPECIFICS TO THE KENYANS, WE WILL BE IN TOUCH WITH THEM AGAIN AS SSON AS THESE INTERNAL ACTIONS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.

3. FYI: WE WILL NOT BE READY TO DISCUSS SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT OF PRIORITIES WITH GOK UNTIL WE HAVE CLEARER PICTURE OF BRITISH SURVEY RECOMMENDATIONS AND INTENTIONS AND OF THE POSSIBILITY OF OFFERING F-5A PACKAGE DRAWN FROM IRAN'S SURPLUS. WE WILL KEEP EMBASSY FULLY INFORMED OF OUR PROGRESS. END FYI

KISSINGER

Return to This Volume Home Page