| Taken Question Office of the Spokesman Washington, DC March 21, 2008 Questions Taken at the March 21, 2008 Daily Press Briefing Unauthorized Access to Passport RecordsQuestion: What are the names of the two companies whose employees gained unauthorized access to Senator Obama's passport files?
Answer
Stanley Corporation and The Analysis Corporation.
Question: What kind of information is contained in the Passport system? What is the range of information that one might find in a passport file?
Answer The application form asks for the biographic information needed to determine if the applicant qualifies for a U.S. Passport, including:
-- the applicant's name, sex, date of birth, place of birth, social security number, marital status and mailing address and previous passport number if applicable. The application form also asks for optional information that helps us to deliver applications on time, and to contact a citizen in case of an emergency:
-- the occupation and employer of the applicant and contact information for the applicant as well as his or her emergency contact. (these have proved invaluable in contacting next of kin when a US citizen dies or needs assistance abroad). In complex circumstances, for instance if there are grounds to suspect possible fraud or if a person born overseas claims citizenship by virtue of having an American citizen parent, we may need additional evidence to review the applications, and we keep this information in the passport file with the applications.
Question: How many total passport files are in the system? Answer There are approximately 180-200 million records in this system. Question: Can you provide a copy of the language that appears on the computer regarding warning on accessing passport information? "PIERS USERS DO NOT REPRODUCE OR PROVIDE COPIES of documents viewed or printed via PIERS for use outside of the Department of State. Unauthorized release of these documents to non-Department staff, including to law enforcement agencies, must be made through the Research and Liaison Branch, CA/PPT/IML/R/RR, 1111 19th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20524-1705. Non-Department requesters should be referred directly to that office. I have read the aforementioned Privacy warning and understand my responsibilities regarding the protection of passport and consular records.
YES NO"
Question: Does using the passport records system this way give one access to or links to other databases? Answer
No. Access to each passports systems application which an employee needs to conduct passport business is authorized separately. Question: Were any laws broken?
Answer
We must await a final determination of the facts to determine what precise laws may have been violated. The passport records at issue here are protected by the Privacy Act of 1974. That Act generally prohibits non-consensual disclosures of personal information about U.S. citizens from a Privacy Act system of records, unless an exception applies. One exception permits officers and employees of the agency who have a need for the record in the performance of their duties to review and use the record. Likewise, Department regulations permit contractors who have a need to review a record the same access as employees. However, access to passport records by contractors who do not have a need to know the information would violate the Privacy Act. In this case, Department policies make clear that passport records can be reviewed only for official reasons.
Question: When was the current database established?
Answer
The Passport Information Electronic Retrieval System (PIERS) was established in 2000 and contains digitally scanned applications. PIERS incorporated the previous database, Passport File Miniaturization, that began in 1978. From 1978 - 1999, passport applications were microfilmed. In 1999, digital scanning began.
Question: Does the Inspector General have authority or ability to talk to or interview employees that have been fired?
Answer
The OIG can request interviews of former employees or contractors but would not have the authority to compel their cooperation under the Inspector General Act. They could, however, be served with a grand jury subpoena compelling them to testify before a Grand Jury. 2008/212 |
