| FY 2003 Actual | FY 2004 Estimate | FY 2005 Request | Change from FY 2004 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amount | % | ||||
| Staff | 1,247 | 1,246 | 1,239 | (7) | (0.6%) |
| Funds | $8,424 | $5,870 | $5,943 | ($72) | (1.2%) |
| Strategic Goal | Performance Goal (Short Title) | Initiative/Program | Major Resources | Lead Bureaus | External Partners |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regional Stability | Close Ties with Allies and Friends | Transatlantic Relationship | D&CP, FMF, IMET, ESF | EUR | N/A |
| International Military Education and Training | D&CP, IMET, FMF | PM | Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD)/Defense Security Cooperation Agency Joint Staff, OSD/DSCA | ||
| Military Assistance for New NATO/NATO-Aspirant Nations | D&CP, FMF, IMET | EUR | DoD, Joint Staff | ||
| Regional Stability in East Asia and the Pacific | D&CP | EAP | DoD | ||
| Resolution of Regional Conflicts | Conflict Management and Resolution | D&CP, PKO, IMET, FMF | AF | DoD, UNDPKO, France, UK, Belgium, ECOWAS, Nigeria, Senegal, Ghana, Kenya, Benin, Mali; | |
| Indo-Pak Relations - Kashmir; | D&CP, FMF, INCLE, ESF, DA, PD | SA | USAID, NSC, DoD, UN Agencies | ||
| Enhanced and Expanded Euro-Atlantic Partnership | D&CP | AC, EUR | OSD, JCS, IC, NSC Joint Consultative Group (JCG) in Vienna, NATO | ||
| Peacekeeping Participation | D&CP, FMF | PM | OSD/Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict | ||
| Implementation of the Road Map | D&CP, ESF | NEA, EB | NSC, USAID, CIA | ||
| Iraq & Gulf Security | D&CP, FMF, IMET,ESF, INCLE, HRDF, IRRF | NEA | NSC, USAID, DoD, Treasury, Commerce, Agriculture, FAA, Education, HHS, International Broadcasting Bureau, DOJ, Energy, UN | ||
| PKO - OSCE | D&CP, FMF, IMET, INCLE, FSA | EUR | OSD, Joint Staff, CIA, NSC | ||
| Security Assistance - Sub-Saharan Africa | D&CP, PKO, ESF, IMET, FMF | AF | Norway, DoD, ECOWAS, UNDPKO, Netherlands, Belgium, France, UK, Nigeria, Senegal, Ghana, Kenya, South Africa, Benin, Mali, Ethiopia, Malawi | ||
| Restrict ACW Transfers | D&CP | NP | 32 Member States of Wassenaar |
| I/P #1: Transatlantic Relationship | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| An enhanced and expanded Euro-Atlantic Partnership to promote stability, security, democracy, and prosperity within the region and build support for U.S. strategic goals beyond Europe. | ||||
| Results | Targets | |||
| 2000 & 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 |
| Outcome Indicator | ||||
| Indicator #1: Status of Transatlantic Security Relationships | ||||
| 2000: Allies revised Transatlantic Framework for Strategic Concept, European Security and Defense Initiative (ESDI) elements, and Open Door Policy. Membership Action Plan launched. NATO-Russia relationship expanded beyond Stabilization Force (SFOR) and Kosovo Force (KFOR). 2001: Redefined European Security and Defense Program (ESDP) goals. Expansion of NATO ties to Partner States. Significant progress on MAP. |
Europeans made pledges at Prague to improve their capabilities. Seven new members invited at Prague. Berlin Plus would have allowed the EU to borrow NATO assets and capabilities for European-led operations, but was not agreed upon.
Allied Heads of State and Government committed at Prague to enhance military capabilities by filling key shortfalls through the New Capabilities Initiative. The initiative will encourage pooling and specialization, introduce the NATO Response force (NRF) and reform NATO's Command Structure. U.S. export controls with key European allies streamlined to promote transatlantic defense industrial integration. NATO-Russia Council (NRC) and 2002 work plan established in May 2002. |
Agreement reached with Allies to reform NATO's command structure. European partners committed themselves to boosting European capabilities. NATO Response Force in process of development.
Seven new members invited to join Alliance. Ratifications by Allies on track to welcome new members by May 2004. Progress made on NATO-Russia projects, including military-to-military cooperation. Retooling Partnership for Peace to better meet the needs of the Central Asia/Caucasus partners. NATO-Ukraine Action Plan launched in which Ukraine, with NATO's assistance, agreed to undertake necessary reforms. |
ESDP capable of substantial operations. Initial operating capability of NRF.
Allies complete full integration into NATO as MAP cycle continues for aspirants. Progress on Partnership-for-Peace (PfP) projects tailored to needs of individual partners. |
Full operating capability of the NATO Response Force.
Increase in European military capabilities through continued investment to fill remaining shortfalls. Consideration of EU-led mission in Bosnia, subject to Balkan policy consideration, and with appropriate NATO-EU agreement and interagency consensus.
NATO operations continue in Afghanistan and Iraq as needed. |
| I/P #2: International Military Education and Training | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strengthen the military capabilities of allies, friends, partners, and international organizations, which in turn serves U.S. national interests in many ways. | ||||
| Results | Targets | |||
| 2000 & 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 |
| Output Indicator | ||||
| (P) Indicator #2: Number of Individuals Receiving Training Under IMET | ||||
| 2000: N/A 2001: 8,386 individuals |
10,417 individuals |
10,736 individuals | 11,689 individuals | 11,484 individuals |
| I/P #3: Military Assistance for New NATO and NATO Aspirant Nations | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. military equipment, services, and training for the governments of the ten new NATO countries recently offered NATO membership - Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia. | ||||
| Results | Targets | |||
| 2000 & 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 |
| Outcome Indicator | ||||
| (P) Indicator #3: Percentage of Aspirants Making Progress Achieving NATO Defined and Measured, Country-Specific Membership Action Plans | ||||
|
2000: 2001: |
Sixty percent of NATO aspirants are making progress toward achieving NATO-defined and measured, country-specific Membership Action Plans. Prague Summit issues membership invitations to seven countries: Estonia, Bulgaria, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia.
Three continuing NATO aspirants -- Croatia, Albania and Macedonia -- continue to participate in NATO's Membership Action Plan. |
Accession Protocols signed by 19 Allies in March; U.S. Senate ratification in May. Invitees' reforms take place, in line with NATO requirements for membership.
Aspirants continue MAP process and, with the U.S., sign the Adriatic Charter, where all parties pledge to work together to move reform efforts towards NATO and EU membership. |
One hundred percent of NATO aspirants are making progress toward NATO-defined and measured, country-specific Member Action Plans. Formal entry of New Allies, who complete full integration into NATO, and assist mentoring of aspirants. MAP cycle continues for aspirants; Adriatric Charter cooperation takes shape. |
All new allies contribute to each aspect of alliance activities, including mentoring of aspirants, and are integrated into revised command arrangements. Three aspirant nations accelerate their reform efforts through MAP; intensify Adriatic Charter cooperation |
| I/P #4: Regional Stability in East Asia and the Pacific | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Use diplomacy to foster stability in the EAP region. | ||||
| Results | Targets | |||
| 2000 & 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 |
| Outcome Indicator | ||||
| Indicator #4: Status of Chinese Cooperation on Regional Stability | ||||
| 2000: Cooperation on regional security selective and episodic. 2001: Limited Chinese tension-reducing diplomatic efforts toward North Korea and South Asia. China cooperated in encouraging North Korean openness and dialogue. |
China encouraged North Korean openness and multilateral dialogue to end its nuclear weapons program. China's public statements at APEC ministerial were helpful in maintaining a nuclear weapons-free Korean Peninsula. |
China discussed its bilateral border disputes with South Asian officials.
China played a crucial role in facilitating multilateral talks with North Korea on maintaining a nuclear weapons-free Korean Peninsula. |
China increases coordination with United States and international community regarding the Korean peninsula, South Asia, and the Middle East. | Full Chinese cooperation with U.S. and international community in reaching settlement of Korean peninsula, South China Sea and Burma issues. |
| Outcome Indicator | ||||
| Indicator #5: Status of U.S.-South Korean Relations | ||||
| 2000: N/A 2001: Baseline: Began interagency discussion of the Future of U.S.-South Korean Alliance. |
Begin Phase II of Joint Study on Future of U.S.-South Korean alliance. | Talks between the U.S. and ROK on the FOTA produced a timetable and division of costs for the reconfiguration of U.S. Forces in Korea during 2004 - 2008. | Start USFK relocation. | Continue USFK relocations from Yongsan and other facilities as jointly agreed with the ROKG on a timeline to complete moves as new ROK-funded acquisition/construction projects are completed. |
| NATO | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (PART Program Efficiency Measure) | ||||
| Results | Targets | |||
| 2000 & 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 |
| Efficiency Indicator | ||||
| Indicator #6: Number of Countries Reaching Sustainable State of Niche Capacities | ||||
| 2000: N/A 2001: N/A |
Baseline:
2/10 |
2/10 | 3/10 | 4/10 |
Means for Achieving FY 2005 Targets
Full operating capability of the NATO Response Force. Increase in European military capabilities through continued investment to fill remaining shortfalls. Consideration of EU-led mission in Bosnia, subject to Balkan policy consideration, and with appropriate NATO-EU agreement and interagency consensus. NATO operations continue in Afghanistan and Iraq as needed.
11,484 individuals receive training under IMET.
New Allies contribute to all aspects of Alliance activities, including mentoring of aspirants, and are integrated into revised command arrangements. Three aspirant nations accelerate their reform efforts through MAP; intensify Adriatic Charter cooperation.
Full Chinese cooperation with U.S. and international community in reaching settlement of Korean peninsula, South China Sea and Burma issues.
Continue USFK relocations from Yongsan and other facilities on a timeline to complete moves as new ROK-funded acquisition/construction projects are completed.
| I/P #5: Conflict Management and Resolution | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Use a variety of diplomatic and foreign assistance tools to turn despair into hope. | ||||
| Results | Targets | |||
| 2000 & 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 |
| Outcome Indicator | ||||
| Indicator #1: Number of African Armed Conflicts Resolved and Peace Support Missions Concluded | ||||
| 2000:
Baseline: Six armed conflicts ongoing. Four peace missions active.
2001: One conflict resolved (Ethiopia-Eritrea). |
South Africa, an African Union member, provided personnel to the Joint Military Commission responsible for working with the UN Observation Mission in the (Democratic Republic of the) Congo to further the Congolese peace process. The war in Sierra Leone was effectively over and the peacekeeping mission was being phased out; peace building activities continue using U.S. and other funding. Program activities such as the West Africa Stabilization Program and ACOTA have ensured that ECOWAS troop contributors are better able to meet the demands of peacekeeping operations. |
Conflicts Resolved: Democratic Republic of Congo - Large-scale conflict resolved with inauguration of a transitional Government of National Unity in July 2003.
Burundi - Conflict partially resolved; fighting continues. Ceasefire reached with the largest rebel group, the Forces for the Defense of Democracy (FDD); agreement in first quarter FY 2004.
Liberia - The Liberian civil war deteriorated starting in May 2003. Peace talks began in Ghana in June 2003 and a comprehensive peace agreement was signed on 18 August. The U.S. provided nearly $26 million in logistics support to enable the deployment of ECOWAS peacekeeping forces. |
Two conflicts resolved (Congo-Great Lakes, Sudan). Two peace support missions withdrawn (Sierra Leone and Ethiopia/Eritrea). |
Peacekeeping mission in Cote d'Ivoire withdrawn and Liberia preparing for final year of peacekeeping operations following elections. |
| I/P #6: Indo-Pak Relations/Kashmir | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indo-Pak tensions are reduced and stability is advanced in Kashmir. | ||||
| Results | Targets | |||
| 2000 & 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 |
| Outcome Indicator | ||||
| Indicator #2: Status of Relations Between Pakistan and India on Kashmir | ||||
|
2000: Continued military action by both sides along the line of control (LOC). Existing CBMs ignored.
2001: From November 2000 to May 2001, Indian offensive security force operations suspended; militant infiltration and attacks continued. Agra Summit broke down over communiqu� wording. |
Major terrorist attacks brought India and Pakistan close to war, but U.S. and U.K. diplomatic intervention helped ease tensions, and Pakistan took actions against Kashmiri jihadist militants. India successfully held elections in Kashmir. Pakistan provided assurances in June that support for infiltration across the Line of Control would cease permanently. Infiltration decreased initially, but appeared to pick up again in the fall, as did violence inside Kashmir. India began to demobilize forces following Kashmiri elections. Pakistan followed suit. USG avoided programming to state of Jammu and Kashmir up to present because of political sensitivity of Kashmir issue and security concerns. |
Infiltration continued throughout the year, though at a lower level than in recent years. Militant-initiated violence in Indian-administered Kashmir was low during the summer, but increased sharply in late August and September. Militant training camps and related infrastructures in Pakistan were not substantially disbanded, although some were deactivated for periods over the summer. Militant groups in Pakistan have been and remain proscribed. Military forces on both sides returned to pre-crisis locations and readiness levels. India and Pakistan renewed diplomatic contact. Indian PM Vajpayee launched a major new peace initiative in April, which Pakistani PM Jamali welcomed. India and Pakistan returned High Commissioners, restored some transportation links, and engaged in numerous people-to-people, including legislative, exchange. However, official talks have not started. |
Infiltration declines significantly. Most terrorist groups in Pakistan disband. India and Pakistan effectively implement existing nuclear and conventional CBMs, and agree to implement new ones, including non-traditional CBMs, such as cooperation on shared water resources. Only if politically feasible, USG examines the potential impact of USG assistance in helping to bring normalcy to Jammu and Kashmir; and what types of assistance would be most suitable for USG funding. |
Infiltration further declines. Terrorism inside Kashmir declines further. Terrorist groups not permitted to operate in Pakistan. India and Pakistan effectively implement existing nuclear and conventional CBMs, and agree to implement new ones. Polling indicates Kashmiris believe their everyday lives are improving. |
| I/P #7: An Enhanced and Expanded Euro-Atlantic Partnership | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promote stability, security, democracy, and prosperity within the region and build support for U.S. strategic goals beyond Europe. | ||||
| Results | Targets | |||
| 2000 & 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 |
| Output Indicator | ||||
| Indicator #3: Implementation of Adapted Conventional Forces in Europe (CFE) Treaty | ||||
|
2000: CFE adaptation negotiations continued. 2001: Second Review Conference of CFE Treaty successfully concluded and advanced U.S. and NATO interests. NATO remained firm in demanding Russian compliance with Istanbul commitments. Russia made initial progress towards implementing Istanbul commitments. |
Russia fulfilled its Istanbul commitment on the flank issue, reduced its flank equipment to Adapted Treaty levels, and discharged its Istanbul commitments for CFE equipment in Georgia and Moldova. Russia needs to reach agreement with Georgia on remaining issues re: Gudauta base and its future use, and the duration of Russian presence in Batumi and Alkhalkalai. Russia also needs to complete the removal and destruction of munitions and small arms in Moldova. Conditions for U.S. ratification of Adapted CFE Treaty have not yet been met. | The situation in Moldova, which had been improving earlier in 2003, then installed at mid-year, is now again proceeding toward resolution; however, the trains moving ammunition and equipment out of Moldova are running only on a modest schedule. Russia did not meet the December 31, 2003 deadline to withdraw forces from Moldova. Progress on Georgia has been stalled for most of 2003, though there are now indications that Georgia and Russia will meet soon to resume discussions on implementing the commitment on Georgia. Russia remains in compliance with Adapted CFE Treaty Flank Limits. |
U.S. and NATO allies agree that Russia has fulfilled all Istanbul commitments, allowing for U.S. ratification and, after all other CFE States Parties ratify, entry into force of the Adapted CFE Treaty. On-going effort improves overall compliance. |
No major problems in implementing the Adapted CFE Treaty. Accession by additional European states wishing to join. On-going effort improves overall compliance. |
| I/P #8: Peacekeeping Participation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Military assistance, including Peacekeeping Operations (PKO), is a key instrument in the realization of U.S. Regional Stability goals. | ||||
| Results | Targets | |||
| 2000 & 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 |
| Output Indicator | ||||
| (P) Indicator #4: Percentage of EIPC-funded. PKO-Trained Countries That Pledge Military Units or Participate in the UN Peacekeeping Standby Arrangement System or Multinational Military Operations of High U.S. Foreign Policy Interest | ||||
| 2000: N/A 2001: Baseline: 85% |
85% | 85.1% | 88% | 90% |
| I/P #9: Implementation of the Road Map | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Implement the President's vision for a permanent, peaceful, two-state solution of the Israeli-Palestinian problem, leading to a comprehensive peace on all tracks, including Israel and its neighbors. | ||||
| Results | Targets | |||
| 2000 & 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 |
| Outcome Indicator | ||||
|
Indicator #5: Full Implementation of the Road Map Leading to an Independent, Democratic Palestinian State, Existing Side by Side With Israel in Peace and Security | ||||
| 2000: N/A 2001: U.S. has encouraged both sides to reach a ceasefire and resume dialogue. |
Periodic, often large-scale, Palestinian terrorist attacks targeted at Israel, often followed by harsh preventive, retaliatory, or deterrent Israeli military actions. Significant civilian casualties on both sides. |
Roadmap to peace introduced. Intermittent cessation of violence. Dialogue between the President and Palestinian and Israeli Prime Ministers. Deployment of a full-time senior representative to the region who has coordinated efforts to implement the roadmap.
|
Work toward an independent Palestinian state with provisional borders. Continued implementation of road map provisions. Reduction of Palestinian poverty and malnutrition to pre-intifada levels. After successful conclusion of Palestinian elections, Quartet convenes international conference. Arab states restore pre-intifada links with Israel. Multilateral track revived. Israeli, Palestinian and regional Arab non-official experts resume dialogue on political, security, arms control, and other regional issues. In Gaza, active public diplomacy and public affairs programming resumes, pursuant to improvement in security situation with NGOs, professional associations, and academic institutions. Provide assistance for economic development in the Palestinian area under the Middle East Partnership Initiative |
Implementation of prior agreements. Enhanced international monitoring of road map implementation. Second international conference convened by Quartet. Private Israelis and Palestinians participate freely with full official support in joint meetings, exchange projects, and people-to-people activities and receive coverage in the Israeli and Palestinian media. |
| I/P #10: Iraq and Gulf Security | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Work with our allies in the Gulf to confront any threats to the region, including weapons of mass destruction and terrorism from al-Qaida or others. | ||||
| Results | Targets | |||
| 2000 & 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 |
| Outcome Indicator | ||||
| Indicator #6: Free, Democratic, and Whole Iraq at Peace with Itself and Its Neighbors | ||||
| 2000: N/A 2001: Saddam regime entrenched in Iraq; UN sanctions remain in effect. |
Saddam Hussein still in power; UN sanctions remain in effect. |
Saddam Hussein's regime overthrown. The Department worked closely with DoD and CPA to stabilize and rebuild Iraq. NEA continues to support the development of strategies to move Iraq towards democracy, rule of law, build free market economy, including non-oil sector; build Iraqi security forces, subordinate to constitutional authority, capable of relieving U.S. and Coalition forces. The Department's engagement at the UN is consistent with the responsibilities outlined in UNSCR 1483. UNSCR 1500 reaffirms the UN's support for the GC and fortifies the important role for the UN in Iraq by establishing a United Nations Assistance Mission to support the work of the UN Special Representative in Iraq. UN agencies have been making critical contributions in humanitarian assistance and economic reform in Iraq. |
Iraqi GC assumes additional responsibilities; Transitional Administrative Law drafted and approved; transitional Iraqi government assumes full sovereignty; continued political, legal and economic reform. Democratic institutions, rule of law, civil society, free media started. Accountability and anti-corruption efforts take hold. | Elections for constitution convention held; constitution drafted and ratified; elections for new, permanent government held; rule of law and civil society take root; free media serves as responsible watchdog on governmental power. Iraq assumes primary responsibility for own security, able to defend itself without being a threat to neighbors. |
| Outcome Indicator | ||||
| Indicator #7: Iraq Reconstruction and Economic Development Improve Living Conditions | ||||
|
2000: Estimated infant mortality rate is 57.61 per 1000 (CIA Fact Book). |
Data not available. | No significant results due to recent end of conflict |
Per capita GDP increases by 10 per cent. Infant mortality rate declines to 45 per 1000. |
Per capita GDP increases by 10 per cent. Infant mortality rate declines to 35 per 1000. |
| I/P #11: Peacekeeping Operations - OSCE | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ensure regional and sub-regional stability in the independent states of the former Soviet Union. | ||||
| Results | Targets | |||
| 2000 & 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 |
| Output Indicator | ||||
| (P) Indicator #8: Implementation of New Police Training Programs in Former Soviet States | ||||
| 2000: N/A 2001: No OSCE training programs in former Soviet States. |
No OSCE training programs in former Soviet States. | Police Unit conducts assessment mission needs assessments, develops project proposals, and obtains seed money for project implementation in Kyrgyzstan as a model. | First projects are implemented in Kyrgyzstan. Police Unit conducts separate assessment missions to the Caucasus and Central Asia and to Belarus, Ukraine and Moldova. Based on results, projects are developed and funding obtained for border training programs throughout the former Soviet Union. | OSCE Police Unit oversees implementation of border training programs throughout the former Soviet Union. Police Unit begins work on a program to create model police stations throughout the former Soviet Union. |
| Output Indicator | ||||
| (P) Indicator #9: Withdrawal of Russian Forces from Moldova and Georgia; OSCE Voluntary Fund Status | ||||
| 2000: N/A 2001: Moldova Voluntary Fund has been in place since December 1999, with mandate based on 1999 Russian Istanbul Commitments with regard to Moldova. All declared Russian CFE Treaty Limited Equipment was withdrawn from Moldova ahead of the December 31, 2001 deadline. |
Work began on withdrawal and disposal of remaining non-TLE equipment and 42,000 tons of ammunition. On Georgia, U.S. pressed sides to resume withdrawal talks. Russians claimed they needed financial help to close remaining bases. | Georgia: Russia and Georgia held one round of discussion regarding withdrawal of Russian forces from Georgia, with no results. Moldova: following the imposition of a U.S./EU visa restriction on Transdniestrian leadership, Transdniestria allowed the Russians to resume removal of Russian munitions and equipment. In the first half of 2003, approximately 30 trains of Russian munitions and military equipment left Moldova. |
Withdrawal from Moldova completed. Verification of compliance by OSCE Mission to Moldova is ongoing. Voluntary Fund remains until all withdrawal issues settled. Russia reaches agreement with Georgia on duration of its military presence and status of Russian presence at a base in Abkhazia. |
Verification continues. Russia's Istanbul commitments on withdrawals from Moldova and Georgia fulfilled; Adapted CFE Treaty ratified, providing basis for new Allies to join NATO. Voluntary Fund ceases operation. Excess contributions in Voluntary Fund returned to donors on a pro rata basis. |
| I/P #12: Security Assistance Programs in Sub-Saharan Africa | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continue to invest in efforts to reduce conflict in Africa. | ||||
| Results | Targets | |||
| 2000 & 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 |
| Outcome Indicator | ||||
| Indicator #10: Implementation of Sudan Peace Process | ||||
| 2000: N/A 2001: Sudan at war, including gross underdevelopment and humanitarian deprivations in the Nuba Mountains region and the south of the country. Violations of human rights throughout Sudan, especially in the Nuba Mountains and the south. |
Both the Government of Sudan and the Sudan People's Liberation Movement/Army began a peace process, resolving two of the most contentious issues: the role of religion and the right of self-determination. Nuba Mountains ceasefire agreement concluded, international monitoring operations begun and humanitarian support provided. Civilian Protection Monitoring Team (CPMT) preparing to stand up. Zones of Tranquility and Slavery Commission work conducted. |
USG continued playing a strong role in the IGAD peace process. Talks continued moving toward conclusion. Wide-ranging USG planning in the event of peace undertaken; most planning targets have been identified. Ceasefire monitoring continued; DDR planning underway. |
The interim period begins. There is a smooth transition as all elements of the peace agreement are implemented. | A sustained international aid and development program is established to support the implementation of the peace agreement leading up to elections. Refugees and IDPs returning home. |
| Output Indicator | ||||
| (P)Indicator #11: Number of U.S.-Trained African Units Deployed to Peace Support/Humanitarian Response Operations | ||||
| 2000: N/A 2001: Five (5) U.S.-trained battalion-sized units successfully participating in peacekeeping or contingency operations. |
Five (5) U.S.-trained battalion-sized units successfully participating in peacekeeping or contingency operations. | Seven (7) African contingents trained by the U.S. or U.S.-trained trainers engaged in peace support missions. An additional five contingents planned for Peace Support Operations (PSO) participation in Liberia and Burundi. | Of all African battalions (or their equivalent) deployed in PKO globally, approximately 65 percent will have significant staff and unit training experience under U.S. or U.S.-trained trainers. | Of all African battalions (or their equivalent) deployed in PKO globally, approximately 70 percent will have significant staff and unit training experience under U.S. or U.S.-trained trainers. |
| I/P #13: Restrict ACW Transfers | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The transfer of advanced conventional arms to states of concern is constrained. | ||||
| Results | Targets | |||
| 2000 & 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 |
| Output Indicator | ||||
| Indicator #12: Effectiveness of Wassenaar Arrangement (WA) Control Lists | ||||
|
2000: Control levels/parameters for some WA items are too high. Because some technologies are available globally, they are effectively uncontrolled. U.S. insistence on retaining those control levels has created problems with allies and threatens to undermine the WA as an arms control regime. 2001: Agreement in the WA to add reporting on two new sub-categories of military vehicles. Within the WA, Russia alone continues to oppose mandatory reporting for small arms and light weapons, Man Portable Air Defense Systems (MANPADS), and warships down to 150 tons. |
No new categories were added to WA control lists, but progress was made in this multi-year effort. Within the WA, Russia alone continues to oppose mandatory reporting for small arms and light weapons, Man Portable Air Defense Systems (MANPADS), and warships down to 150 tons. |
Within WA control lists, certain categories of weapons are being expanded, some widely available (and thus uncontrollable); dual-use items were dropped, and MANPADS has made considerable progress with energetic cooperation from Russia, the UK, and other countries. Over the past ten years, the value of shipments of conventional weapons to state sponsors of terrorism has fallen by nine-tenths, and illicit shipments to other destinations have also fallen. Tools include bilateral demarches and intelligence liaison, strengthening of norms in the Wassenaar Arrangement and other international for a, sanctions, law enforcement, and (potentially) direct interdiction. Results have been better than expected, especially since Iraq is no longer importing conventional weapons. |
Prompt reporting of arms transfers on the WAIS. Reporting of denials of arms transfers, and notification before undercutting a previous dual-use denial. Sharing of "best practices" papers on effective export control practices within the WA. Gain additional support (outside Wassenaar) for Wassenaar's "Elements for Export Controls of MANPADS."
|
More extensive reporting of conventional arms transfers by member states
Expand catch-all (i.e., controls by end-user in addition to controlling the item or technology) Expand denial consultations. (i.e.,, consultation before approving an export of an item or technology already denied for export by another member state) Chinese cooperation on MANPADS (to safeguard and restrict production, storage, transfer, and brokering of Man Portable air Defense Systems, such as Stinger or Igla). |
| PKO Funding of OSCE Activities | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (PART Program Efficiency Measure) | ||||
| Results | Targets | |||
| 2000 & 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 |
| Efficiency Indicator | ||||
| Indicator #13: Per Unit Cost of USG-Funded OSCE election observation | ||||
| 2000: N/A 2001: N/A |
Baseline: $6,500 per long-term observer. $3,700 per short-term observer. |
5% below baseline |
10% below baseline |
15% below baseline |
| Note: Calculated using average travel and per diem cost per USG-funded observer. Cost per election observer declines due to better utilization of market airfares, standardized per diem rates, closer monitoring of election schedules to minimize per diem days and maximize staffing efficiency for multi-round elections. | ||||
| Security Assistance to Sub-Saharan Africa | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (PART Program Efficiency Measure) | ||||
| Results | Targets | |||
| 2000 & 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 |
| Efficiency Indicator | ||||
| Indicator #14: Rate of Program Country Sustainment — Cost to Train and Equip One Battalion of U.S.-trained or U.S. Trainer-trained African Peacekeeping Troops | ||||
| 2000: N/A 2001: Baseline: ($75M to produce 8 battalions) |
$15M to produce 4 battalions. |
$8M to produce 6 battalions. |
$15M to produce 14 battalions. |
$15M to produce 15 battalions. |
Means for Achieving FY 2005 Targets
Peacekeeping mission in Cote d'Ivoire withdrawn and Liberia preparing for final year of peacekeeping operations following elections.
Infiltration further declines. Terrorism inside Kashmir declines further. Terrorist groups not permitted to operate in Pakistan. India and Pakistan effectively implement existing nuclear and conventional CBMs, and agree to implement new ones.
Pilot programming in Kashmir results in some tangible benefits (e.g., increased literacy rates, child survival rates, citizen advocacy and/or employment).
Polling indicates Kashmiris believe their everyday lives are improving.
No major problems in implementing the Adapted CFE Treaty. Accession by additional European states wishing to join. On-going effort improves overall compliance.
Ninety percent of EIPC-funded. PKO-Trained countries pledge military units or participate in the UN Peacekeeping Standby arrangement system or multinational military operations of high U.S. foreign policy interest.
Implementation of prior Israeli-Palestinian agreements. Enhanced international monitoring of road map implementation. Second international conference convened by Quartet. Private Israelis and Palestinians participate freely with full official support in joint meetings, exchange projects, and people-to-people activities and receive coverage in the Israeli and Palestinian media.
Elections for constitution convention held; constitution drafted and ratified; elections for new, permanent government held; rule of law and civil society take root; free media serves as responsible watchdog on governmental power. Iraq assumes primary responsibility for own security, able to defend itself without being a threat to neighbors.
OSCE Police Unit oversees implementation of border training programs throughout the former Soviet Union. Police Unit begins work on a program to create model police stations throughout the former Soviet Union.
Verification continues. Russia's Istanbul commitments on withdrawals from Moldova and Georgia fulfilled; Adapted CFE Treaty ratified, providing basis for new Allies to join NATO. Voluntary Fund ceases operation. Excess contributions in Voluntary Fund returned to donors on a pro rata basis.
A sustained international aid and development program is established to support the implementation of the peace agreement leading up to elections. Refugees and IDPs returning home.
Of all African battalions (or their equivalent) deployed in PKO globally, approximately 70 percent will have significant staff and unit training experience under U.S. or U.S.-trained trainers.
More extensive reporting of conventional arms transfers by member states. Expanded catch-all. Expanded denial consultations. Chinese cooperation on MANPADS.
| Regional Stability | |
|---|---|
| Man-Portable Air-Defense Systems (MANPADS) |
The State Department led the international effort to prevent terrorists from acquiring MANPADS, more commonly known as shoulder-fired missiles, that could be used to shoot down civilian airliners and government aircraft. Under U.S. leadership the G-8 agreed to: strengthen export controls (including limiting transfers to those between governments); research access controls for newly produced MANPADS; strengthen security of government stocks; and destroy MANPADS that are surplus to defense needs. The State Department led parallel efforts in the Wassenaar Arrangement, which strengthened substantially its control guidelines and includes most producers of MANPADS; and in APEC, which agreed to key commitments and to pursue further efforts in 2004. Also, we are working closely with Russia to support their effort to gain control of MANPADS in the CIS. The State Department secured commitments from 6 countries to destroy nearly 10,000 MANPADS (approximately 1% of the MANPADS that have ever been produced). Almost 1,200 were destroyed by the end of FY 2003. |
| Enhanced International Peacekeeping Capabilities (EIPC) contribution to U.S. Foreign Policy Goals |
Since its inception, EIPC funds have been allocated to 27 nations. More than a third have participated in SFOR or KFOR. In its first five years, EIPC has spent $26.5 million to influence the policies and improve the capabilities of nations that supply 60% of UN peacekeepers (22,357 out of 37, 475 troops currently deployed). Eight of the 12 countries that contribute 1,000 or more personnel to UN peacekeeping operations are EIPC recipients (Bangladesh, India, Ghana, Jordan, Ukraine, Nepal, Uruguay, and Poland. Of the others, two received support for their peacekeeping programs from other USG sources (Kenya - ACRI, and Nigeria - OFR and ACRI). |
| Sri Lanka |
The Department played a significant role in moving the peace process forward by coordinating donor support for a "peace dividend" and by insisting the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) abandon terrorism and reshape itself into a legitimate political organization. In April, the Department hosted a seminar on Sri Lanka attended by 26 countries and 18 international organizations to coordinate support among potential donors to Sri Lanka. In June, the United States co-chaired, along with Norway, the European Union, and Japan, a donors' conference for Sri Lanka held in Tokyo. The United States pledged $54 million over a two-year period, the largest bilateral contribution after Japan's. Total pledges at the conference added up to a staggering $4.5 billion. The Department provided assistance to internally displaced persons and funded a demining program in the war-torn areas. The Department also funded a number of other programs directly supportive of the peace process, which have brought considerable relief to a war-weary populace. At the end of the year, the LTTE presented a proposal to resume peace negotiations, which it had suspended in April, with the Government. Although the Government has been unable to respond effectively to the LTTE proposal due to political infighting between the President and Prime Minister, it is likely that peace negotiations between the government and LTTE will resume in 2004. Although the country remains in transition, there is a sense that peace has returned to the island for good. |
| Performance Goal 1 Close, strong, and effective U.S. ties with allies, friends, partners and regional organizations |
|---|
|
| Performance Goal 2 Existing and emergent regional conflicts are contained or resolved |
|
Table 1: State Appropriations by Bureau ($ Thousands)
Bureau
FY 2003 Actual
FY 2004 Estimate
FY 2005 Request
International Organization Affairs
$694,743
$716,874
$1,539,000
European and Eurasian Affairs
37,469
38,863
45,796
Near Eastern Affairs
25,922
26,945
30,171
East Asian and Pacific Affairs
19,170
20,046
21,986
Other Bureaus
161,050
261,347
104,612
Total State Appropriations
938,354
1,064,075
1,089,253
Table 2: Foreign Operations by Account ($ Thousands
| Title/Accounts | FY 2003 Actual | FY 2004 Estimate | FY 2005 Request |
|---|---|---|---|
| Title I - Export and Investment Assistance | |||
| Export-Import Bank | |||
| Overseas Private Investment Corporation | |||
| Trade and Development Agency | |||
| Title II - Bilateral Economic Assistance | |||
| USAID | 53,945 | 28,254 | 36,893 |
| Other Bilateral Economic Assistance | 1,836,174 | 699,975 | 480,530 |
| Independent Agencies | |||
| Department of State | 12,400 | 12,540 | 15,780 |
| Department of Treasury | |||
| Complex Foreign Contingencies | 0 | 0 | 50,000 |
| Title III - Military Assistance | |||
| International Military Education and Training | 65,181 | 76,723 | 71,842 |
| Foreign Military Financing | 5,460,850 | 3,951,639 | 4,145,985 |
| Peacekeeping Operations | 57,126 | 37,230 | 52,000 |
| Title IV - Multilateral Economic Assistance | |||
| International Financial Institutions | |||
| International Organizations and Programs | 0 | 0 | 500 |
| Total Foreign Operations | 7,485,678 | 4,806,361 | 4,853,530 |
| Grand Total | $8,424,032 | $5,870,436 | $5,942,783 |