printable banner
PART Assessment Ratings and Scores (2002-2006)


FY 2006 Performance and Accountability Highlights
Bureau of Resource Management
November 2006

 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE PART ASSESSMENT RATINGS AND SCORES (2002-2006)
Program Name Scores and Ratings
as of November 15, 2006
Assessed
in 2006
Contributions to the International Atomic Energy Agency 98% ? Effective Yes
Educational and Cultural Exchange Programs, Near East and South Asia 97% ? Effective No
Global Educational and Cultural Exchanges 97% ? Effective No
Capital Security Construction 97% ? Effective No
Migration and Refugee Assistance- Protection 96% ? Effective No
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees 96% ? Effective No
South Asia Military Assistance 93% ? Effective No
Humanitarian Demining 93% ? Effective No
Migration and Refugee Assistance- Other PRM Programs 93% ? Effective No
International Boundary and Water Commission 92% ? Effective Yes
Visa and Consular Services 92% ? Effective No
Worldwide Security Upgrades 92% ? Effective No
Humanitarian Migrants to Israel 91% ? Effective No
Contribution to United Nations Development Program 91% ? Effective No
Contribution to United Nations Children?s Fund and Other Programs 91% ? Effective Yes
Security Assistance for Western Hemisphere 90% ? Effective Yes
Export Control Assistance 90% ? Effective No
Nonproliferation and Disarmament Fund 89% ? Effective No
Foreign Service Institute 88% ? Effective Yes
Support for East European Democracy/ Freedom Support Act 88% ? Effective No
U.S. Embassy Compound Security 87% ? Effective Yes
Contributions for International Peacekeeping Activities 86% ? Effective No
Refugee Admissions to the U.S. 86% ? Effective No
Non-Security Embassy Construction 86% ? Effective No
Terrorist Interdiction Program 85% ? Effective No
Anti-Terrorism Assistance 85% ? Effective No
Peacekeeping Operations ? OSCE 83% ? Moderately Effective No
Contributions to International Organizations 82% ? Moderately Effective Yes
Military Assistance to new NATO and NATO Aspirant Nations 82% ? Moderately Effective No
Security Assistance to Sub-Saharan Africa 77% ? Moderately Effective No
Nonproliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction Expertise 76% ? Moderately Effective No
President?s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) Focus Countries 73% ? Moderately Effective No
Protection of Foreign Missions and Officials 72% ? Moderately Effective No
Economic Support Fund- Western Hemisphere 71% ? Moderately Effective No
Security Assistance for Near East Asia
69% ? Adequate
Yes
Economic Support Fund- Africa 67% ? Adequate No
Economic Support Fund- Human Rights and Democracy Fund 66% ? Adequate No
PEPFAR - Global Fund 65% ? Adequate No
Interagency Cooperative Administrative Support Services 65% ? Adequate No
Contributions to International Fisheries Commissions 59% ? Adequate No
Public Diplomacy 59% ? Adequate Yes
PEPFAR- Other Bilateral Programs 58% ? Adequate No
International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement Programs, Africa/Asia 53% ? Adequate No
International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Programs, South Asia 53% ? Adequate Yes
International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Programs, Western Hemisphere 53% ? Adequate No
Andean Counterdrug Initiative 52% ? Adequate No
International Information Programs 50% ? Adequate Yes

 


< Go to Previous Page        Go to Next Page >