• Multimedia
• Blog
• Subscribe
• What's New
• Contact Us
• Archive

• Topic
  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • E
  • F
  • G
  • H
  • I
  • J
  • K
  • L

  • M
  • N
  • O
  • P
  • Q
  • R
  • S
  • T
  • U
  • V
  • W
  • XYZ

  
  Select the list of topics to display.
• Country
  • A-B
  • C-E
  • F-K
  • L-O
  • P-S
  • T-Z
  • Regions

  Please choose a country or other area, or a Region.
• Publication Type
• Speaker
  • A-C
  • D-K
  • L-R
  • S-Z
• Date
  • • Most Recent
    • Past 7 days
    • Past 90 days

Conventional Arms Transfer (CAT) Policy

In addition to undertaking a legal review of each proposed arms transfer and third party transfers, PM/RSAT also applies the following criteria prior to making a determination:

• Consistency with international agreements and arms control initiatives.

  
  

• Appropriateness of the transfer in responding to legitimate U.S. and recipient security needs.

  
  

• Consistency with U.S. regional stability interests, especially when considering transfers involving power projection capability or introduction of a system which may foster increased tension or contribute to an arms race.

  
  

• The impact of the proposed transfer on U.S. capabilities and technological advantage, particularly in protecting sensitive software and hardware design, development, manufacturing, and integration knowledge.

  
  

• The degree of protection afforded sensitive technology and potential for unauthorized third-party transfer, as well as in-country diversion to unauthorized uses.

  
  

• The risk of revealing system vulnerabilities and adversely impacting U.S. operational capabilities in the event of compromise.

  
  

• The degree to which the transfer supports U.S. strategic and foreign policy interests through increased access and influence, allied burden sharing, and interoperability.

  
  

• The human rights, terrorism and proliferation record of the recipient and the potential for misuse of the export in question.

  
  

• The impact of U.S. industry and the defense industrial base whether the sale is approved or not.

  
  

• The availability of comparable systems from foreign suppliers.

  
  

• The ability of the recipient effectively to field, support, and appropriately employ the requested system in accordance with its intended end-use.

  
  

• The risk of adverse economic, political or social impact within the recipient nation and the degree to which security needs can be addressed by other means.