Great Seal The State Department web site below is a permanent electronic archive of information released prior to January 20, 2001.  Please see www.state.gov for material released since President George W. Bush took office on that date.  This site is not updated so external links may no longer function.  Contact us with any questions about finding information.

NOTE: External links to other Internet sites should not be construed as an endorsement of the views contained therein.

105th Congress
2d Session
Treaty Doc. 105-51

SENATE

CONVENTION ON PROTECTION OF CHILDREN AND CO-OPERATION IN RESPECT OF INTERCOUNTRY ADOPTION
__________

MESSAGE

from

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

transmitting

CONVENTION ON PROTECTION OF CHILDREN AND CO-OPERATION IN RESPECT OF INTERCOUNTRY ADOPTION, ADOPTED AND OPENED FOR SIGNATURE AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE SEVENTEENTH SESSION OF THE HAGUE CONFERENCE ON PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW ON MAY 29, 1993

June 11, 1998. -- Convention was read the first time and, together with the accompanying papers, referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations and ordered to be printed for the use of the Senate

----------

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL

----------

The White House
June 11, 1998.

To the Senate of the United States:

With a view to receiving the advice and consent of the Senate to ratification, I transmit herewith the Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption, adopted and opened for signature at the conclusion of the Seventeenth Session of the Hague Conference on Private International Law on May 29, 1993. Thirty-two countries, including the United States, have signed the Convention, 17 countries have ratified it, and one country has acceded to it. The provisions of the Convention are fully explained in the report of the Department of State that accompanies this message.

The Convention sets out norms and procedures to safeguard children involved in intercountry adoptions and to protect the interests of their birth and adoptive parents. These safeguards are designed to discourage trafficking in children and to ensure that intercountry adoptions are made in the best interests of the children involved. Cooperation between Contracting States will be facilitated by the establishment in each Contracting State of a central authority with programmatic and case-specific functions. The Convention also provides for the recognition of adoptions that fall within its scope in all other Contracting States.

The Convention leaves the details of its implementation up to each Contracting State. Implementing legislation prepared by the Administration will soon be transmitted for introduction in the Senate and the House of Representatives. Once implementing legislation is enacted, some further time would be required to put the necessary regulations and institutional mechanisms in place. We would expect to deposit the U.S. instrument of ratification and bring the Convention into force for the United States as soon as we are able to carry out all of the obligations of the Convention.

It is estimated that U.S. citizens annually adopt as many children from abroad as all other countries combined (13,621 children in Fiscal Year 1997). The Convention is intended to ensure that intercountry adoptions take place in the best interests of the children and parents involved, and to establish a system of cooperation among Contracting States to prevent abduction of, and trafficking in children. We have worked closely with U.S. adoption interests and the legal community in negotiating the provisions of the Convention and in preparing the necessary implementing legislation. I recommend that the Senate give its advice and consent to ratification of this Convention, subject to the declaration described in the accompanying report of the Department of State.

William J. Clinton.

LETTER OF SUBMITTAL

----------

Department of State
Washington, April 29, 1998.

The President
The White House.

The President: I have the honor to submit to you, with the recommendation that it be transmitted to the Senate for its advice and consent to ratification, the Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption. The Convention was adopted and opened for signature at the conclusion of the Seventeenth Session of the Hague Conference on Private International Law on May 29, 1993. It was signed by the United States at the Royal Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs on March 31, 1994. As of February 1998 it had been signed by 31 other States and had been ratified by 17 of those States and acceded to by one other State. The Convention entered into force on May 1, 1995 after the deposit of the third instrument of ratification. U.S. citizens adopt over 13,000 children from abroad every year, representing about half of all children made available annually for intercountry adoption worldwide. The Department of State is hopeful that ratification of the Convention by the United States may encourage additional States to become parties to the Convention.

The Convention endorses the legal institution of intercountry adoption by recognizing in its preamble that children should grow up in a family environment, to ensure their full and harmonious development. After recalling that every State should take priority measures to enable children to remain in the care of their family of origin, the signatory States recognize that intercountry adoption may offer the advantage of a permanent family to a child for whom a suitable family cannot be found in the child's State of origin. The preamble strongly suggests that if a child cannot remain in the care of its family of origin and cannot readily be provided with a permanent family in its country of origin, the provision of a permanent family through intercountry adoption can be more beneficial for the child than foster or institutional care in the child's country of origin.

Chapter I of the Convention contains Articles 1-3. Article 1 sets out the three general objectives of the Convention: (a) to establish safeguards to ensure that intercountry adoptions are in the best interests of the child and respectful of the child's fundamental rights recognized in international law; (b) to establish cooperation among Contracting States to ensure the safeguards are respected and thereby prevent abuses such as child abduction and the sale of, or traffic in, children; and (c) to secure the recognition in Contracting States of adoptions made in compliance with the requirements of the Convention.

Article 2 sets out the scope of application of the Convention. It is to apply when a child habituallyresident in a State of origin that is party to the Convention either has been, or is to be, moved to a receiving State that is party to the Convention after the child's adoption in the State of origin by spouses or a person habitually resident in the receiving State, or for the purpose of such an adoption in the receiving State. Article 2 makes clear that the Convention covers only adoptions creating a permanent legal parent-child relationship.

Article 3 limits application of the Convention by providing that the Convention ceases to apply if the child turns 18 before the adoption has reached the point at which the Central Authorities of both the State of origin and the receiving State or those performing Central Authority functions have agreed that the adoption may proceed (Article 17c). Adoptions to which the Convention does not apply or no longer applies may proceed, but will not be subject to the Convention's requirements. The provisions of Chapter II (Articles 4-5) set out the most fundamental determinations that must be made by the competent authorities of the State of origin of a child and the receiving State before an adoption covered by the Convention may take place.

Article 4 requires the determination by the competent authorities of the State of origin that (a) the child is legally adoptable; (b) an intercountry adoption is in the child' best interests once due consideration has been given to the possibility of placement of the child within the State of origin; (c) the persons and entities whose consent to adoption of the child is necessary have freely given their consent in the requisite written form in awareness of the consequences and without inducement by payment or compensation (and with consent of the mother, where required, only after birth of the child); and (d) depending on the age and maturity of the child, the child has been counseled about the effects of adoption and where required, the child's consent has been obtained in the appropriate manner. Requiring these determinations will protect children immigrating to the United States from other Contracting States and children emigrating from the United States who are being adopted by persons residing in other Contracting States.

Under Article 5, an adoption covered by the Convention may take place only if the competent authorities of the receiving State have determined that the prospective adoptive parents are legally eligible and suited by their circumstances to adopt a child from abroad and have been appropriately counseled. Those authorities must also have determined that the child is or will be authorized to enter and reside permanently in the receiving State.

Chapter III (Articles 6-13) deals with Central Authorities and accredited bodies. Article 6 provides that every Contracting State is to designate a CentralAuthority to discharge the duties imposed upon it by the Convention. Federal states and States with more than one system of law, or having autonomous territorial units, may appoint more than one Central Authority, but are to designate a national Central Authority to which communications may be addressed for onward transmission.

Article 7 sets out the non-delegable functions of Central Authorities which they must perform to protect children and achieve other objects of the Convention. Central Authorities are to cooperate with each other and promote cooperation amongst the competent authorities in their States. They are to take directly all appropriate measures to provide (1) information on their adoption laws, and (2) general information such as statistics and standard forms. They are also to keep each other informed about operation of the Convention and, as far as possible, to eliminate any obstacles to its application.

Article 8 provides that Central Authorities are to take themselves, or through public authorities, all appropriate measures to prevent improper financial or other gain in connection with intercountry adoptions and are to deter all practices contrary to the objects of the Convention.

Article 9 states that Central Authorities are to take themselves, or through public authorities or other bodies in their State, all appropriate measures, inter alia, to (a) assemble and exchange information about the situation of the child and the prospective adoptive parents in connection with a particular proposed adoption; (b) facilitate, monitor and expedite proceedings with a view to completing an adoption; (c) promote the development of adoption counseling and post-adoption services; (d) exchange general evaluation reports about experience with intercountry adoption; and (e) respond, as permitted by their domestic law, to justified information requests about particular adoption situations from other Central Authorities or public authorities

Article 10 provides that Convention accreditation is to be granted to and maintained only by bodies (adoption agencies) that demonstrate their competence to provide adoption-related services. This Article leaves up to each Contracting State what authorities or entities are to provide accreditation.

Article 11 sets out specific requirements to be met by bodies (adoption agencies) if they are to qualify for accreditation under the Convention. These requirements must be read together with the Article 32 requirements and prohibitions that are applicable to all adoptions covered by the Convention. Accredited bodies (adoption agencies) may pursue only "non-profit objectives," the conditions and limits to be established by the competent authorities of the accrediting country. Accredited bodies (adoption agencies) are to be directed and staffed by personsqualified by their ethical standards and by training or experience to work in the field of intercountry adoption. Finally, accredited bodies (adoption agencies) are to be subject to supervision by competent authorities of the country in which they operate as to their composition, operation, and financial situation.

Article 12 provides that a body (adoption agency) accredited in one Contracting State may act in another Contracting State only if it has been authorized to do so by the competent authorities of both States.

Article 13 states that each Contracting State is to notify the Permanent Bureau (secretariat) of the Hague Conference of the designation of Central Authorities, as well as the names and addresses of accredited bodies (adoption agencies)

Chapter IV (Articles 14-22) sets out the various procedural steps involved in individual intercountry adoptions covered by the Convention. Its use of the word "Central Authority" should also be viewed as encompassing in many countries public authorities and, in the United States, bodies (adoption agencies) accredited under Chapter III and meeting the requirements of Article 32, and bodies (adoption agencies) or persons approved as meeting the requirements of Articles 22(2) and 32

While the Convention does not explicitly authorize prospective adoptive parents to undertake direct steps to adopt children from another Contracting State, it does not bar such activity. Article 29 sets certain requirements for contacts between prospective adoptive parents and the parents or caregivers of the child they seek to adopt -- contacts that normally could only take place in the country of origin of the child that is the subject of the possible intercountry adoption. While the Convention thus permits direct efforts by prospective adoptive parents to adopt a child from another Contracting State, the Convention's substantive requirements and many of its procedures would apply to such an intercountry adoption. Countries of origin may, however, refuse to allow prospective adoptive parents to arrange intercountry adoptions directly on their own behalf and may require that they obtain the assistance of public authorities or Convention-accredited adoption agencies.

Article 14 provides that persons habitually resident in a Contracting State wishing to adopt a child habitually resident in another such State are to apply to the Central Authority (or a public authority) in the State of their habitual residence (the receiving State).

Article 15 sets the requirements for a report and its findings on the prospective adoptive parents. Under this provision, if the Central Authority (public authority, Convention-accredited agency, or agency or person approved under Convention Article 22(2)) is satisfied that the applicant prospective adoptive parents are eligible and suited to adopt, it shall prepare a report (home study) including specified background information on them, as well as on the characteristics of the children (e.g., special needs children) for whom they would be qualified to care for as adoptive parents. The Central Authority of the receiving State is to transmit the report to the Central Authority (or public authority, accredited agency, or approved agency or person) of the State of origin.

Article 16a sets out the information requirements for the report concerning the child and its background. The report is to be transmitted to the Central Authority (public authority, accredited adoption agency or approved agency or individual adoption service provider) in the receiving State with proof that the necessary consents have been obtained in accordance with Article 4 of the Convention, and the reasons for its determination on placement of the child, taking care not to reveal the identity of the birth parents of the child if, in the State of origin, these identities may not be disclosed. Under Article 16b the Central Authority of the State of origin is to give "due consideration" to the child's upbringing and the child's ethnic, religious and cultural background and is to determine whether the envisaged placement is in the best interests of the child.

Under Article 17 any decision in the State of origin that a child should be entrusted to the prospective adoptive parents may only be made if(a) that State's Central Authority has ensured that the prospective adoptive parents agree; (b) the Central Authority (public authority, Convention-accredited adoption agency, Convention-approved adoption agency or individual provider of adoption services) in the receiving State has approved the decision when such approval is required by the law of that State or by the Central Authority of the State of origin; (c) the Central Authorities of both States have agreed that the adoption may proceed; and (d) it has been determined, in accordance with Article 5, that (i) the prospective parents are eligible and suited to adopt, and (ii) the child is or will be authorized to enter and permanently reside in the receiving State.

Article 18 provides that the Central Authorities of both the State of origin and the receiving State are to take all necessary steps to obtain permission for the child to leave the State of origin and enter and reside permanently in the receiving State.

According to Article 19 the movement of the child to the receiving State may take place only if the requirements of Article 17 have been met. The Central Authorities of both States are to ensure that the transfer takes place in secure and appropriate circumstances, and, if possible but not necessarily, in the company of the adoptive or prospective adoptive parents. If the child's transfer does not ultimately take place the reports referred to in Article 15 (on the prospective adoptive parent(s)) and Article 16 (on the child) are to be returned to the authorities who transmitted them.

Article 20 calls on the Central Authorities to keep each other informed about the adoption process in individual cases, as well as the progress of the placement if a probationary period is required before the final adoption.

Article 21 states that when the adoption is to take place after the transfer of the child to the receiving State and it appears that the continued placement of the child with the prospective adoptive parents is not in the child's best interests, the receiving State Central Authority (or public authority, accredited adoption agency, or Convention-approved adoption agency or individual adoption service provider) shall take the measures necessary to protect the child, in particular (a) to remove the child from the prospective adoptive parents and arrange for the child's temporary care; and (b) in consultation with the Central Authority (or adoption service provider) of the State of origin, to arrange without delay a new placement of the child with a view to adoption, or, if this is not appropriate, to arrange alternative long-term care. An adoption is not to take place until the Central Authority (or adoption service provider) of the State of origin has been duly informed concerning the new prospective adoptive parents. Only as a last resort is the child to be returned to its State of origin if the child's interests so require. Article 21(2) provides for consultation with, and, where appropriate, consent of, the child, regarding the measures taken under this Article.

Use of the term "Central Authority" throughout Chapter IV (Articles 14-22) should be understood in light of actions taken by Contracting States pursuant to Article 22.

Article 22(1) states that the functions of a Central Authority under Chapter IV may be performed by public authorities or by bodies (agencies) accredited under Chapter III, to the extent permitted by the law of the State in question.

Under Article 22(2) any Contracting State may declare to the depositary of the Convention that the functions of the Central Authority under all Articles of Chapter IV except Article 14 and 22, may be performed in that State by bodies (adoption agencies) or persons (e.g., attorneys) who (a) meet the requirements of integrity, professional competence, experience and accountability of that State, and (b) are qualified by their ethical standards and by training or experience to work in the field of intercountry adoption (the same requirement as imposed for accredited bodies under Article 11b). Under Article 22(3) a Contracting State making the declaration permitted under Article 22(2) is to keep the Permanent Bureau of the Hague Conference on Private International Law informed of the names and addresses of these Convention-approved bodies and persons.Article 22(4) states that any Contracting State may declare that adoptions of its children pursuant to the Convention may only take place if Central Authority functions are performed in accordance with Article 22(1), i.e., by Central authorities, public authorities or Convention-accredited bodies (adoption agencies), i.e., not by bodies or persons found only to meet the requirements of Article 22(2). Notwithstanding any declaration made under Article 22(2), the reports provided for in Articles 15 and 16 are, in every case, to be prepared under the responsibility of either the respective Central Authority or other public authority or Convention-accredited adoption agencies as provided for in Article 22(1).

I recommend that the United States ratification be subject to the following declaration:

Chapter V (Articles 23-27) deals with the recognition and effects of Hague Convention adoptions.

Article 23 requires the recognition by operation of law in all Contracting States of adoptions certified as made in accordance with the Convention. The certificate is to specify when and by whom the agreements under Article 17c that the adoption could proceed were given. Each Contracting State is, at the time of its signature or action resulting in its becoming a party to the Convention, required to notify the Convention depositary of the identity and functions of the authorities which are competent to make this certification in that State and any modifications of their designation.

Article 24 permits a Contracting State to refuse to recognize a Convention adoption only if the adoption is manifestly contrary to its public policy, taking into account the best interests of the child. As the authorities of both the country of origin and the receiving State have been involved in permitting the adoption to take place pursuant to the Convention, resort to the public policy exception to recognition by one of those States, or by a non-involved third Contracting State, would be very rare and invoked only in exceptional circumstances.

Article 39(2) permits any Contracting States to enter into agreements with one or more other such States with a view to improving the application of the Convention in their mutual relations. Such agreements may derogate only from certain provisions of Convention Chapter IV concerned with procedural requirements. This provision was included at the request of the Nordic States. Article 25 permits any Contracting State to declare to the Convention depositary that it will not be bound to recognize adoptions made in accordance with an agreement concluded pursuant to the authority given by Article 39(2).

Article 26(1) provides that recognition of an adoption includes recognition of the legal parent-child relationship between the child and the child's adoptive parents, parental responsibility of the adoptive parents for the child, and termination of the pre-existing legal relationship between the child and the child's mother and father--provided the adoption has this effect in the Contracting State where the adoption was made. When the adoption has the effect of terminating the pre-existing legal parent-child relationship, the child is to enjoy in the receiving State, and in any other Contracting State where the adoption is recognized, rights equivalent to those resulting from adoptions having this effect in the Contracting States concerned. However, the provisions of Article 26 are not to prejudice the application of any provision more favorable for the child that may be in force in the Contracting State recognizing the adoption.

Article 27 sets the requirements for the conversion of what may be a simple adoption in the country of origin into a full adoption in the receiving State. When an adoption granted in the State of origin does not have the effect of terminating the pre-existing legal parent-child relationship (simple adoption) it may be converted in the receiving State recognizing the adoption under the Convention into an adoption having such an effect (full adoption) if the law of the receiving State so permits and if the consents to the intercountry adoption referenced in Article 4c and d have been given. Article 27 also requires that Article 23, which mandates recognition of an adoption made in accordance with the Convention, shall apply to the decision converting the simple adoption to a full adoption.

Chapter VI (Article 28-42) contains what are referred to as general provisions.

Article 28 was stated to be important to some countries that considered it essential for the political acceptability of the Convention. The Article states that the Convention does not affect any law of a State of origin that requires that adoption of a child habitually resident within that State to take place in that State or which prohibits the child's placement in, or transfer to, the receiving State prior to the child's adoption.

Article 29 prohibits contacts between the prospective adoptive parents on the one hand, and the parents of the child or any other person who has care of the child on the other hand, until the requirements of Article 4a-c, and Article 5a have been met--unless the adoption takes place "within a family", or unless the contact is in compliance with the conditions established by the competent authority of the State of origin. Such contacts are regulated to minimize the possibility of inducements for consent by payment or compensation that are prohibited by Article 4c(3) of the Convention. As the contacts in question are possible only within the State of origin, and primarily when the prospective adoptive parents are seeking to act directly on their own behalf and without the assistance of Convention-accredited agencies or Convention-approved agencies or persons, this Article implicitly confirms that, so far as the Convention is concerned, prospective adoptive parents may seek to act directly on their own behalf but subject to the applicable requirements of the Convention and the consent of the States concerned.

Article 30 requires competent authorities of every Contracting State to ensure that information held by them concerning the child's origin, and in particular information concerning the identity of the child's parents, as well as the child's medical history, will be preserved. Subparagraph 2 requires those competent authorities to ensure that the child or the child's representative have access to such information, with appropriate guidance, insofar as is permitted by the law of the State where the information is preserved.

Article 31 makes clear that personal data gathered or transmitted pursuant to the Convention, especially data referred to in Articles 15 (home study on the prospective adoptive parents) and 16 (the report with background on the child) are to be used only for the purposes for which the data were gathered or transmitted.

Article 32 sets certain requirements that are to be generally applicable to all adoptions covered by the Convention, including the operation of Convention-accredited bodies, Convention-approved bodies and persons referred to in Article 22. No one is to derive improper financial or other gain from an activity related to an intercountry adoption. Only costs and expenses, including reasonable professional fees of persons involved in the adoption, may be charged or paid.

Article 33 provides that a competent authority which finds that any provision of the Convention has not been respected or that there is a serious risk that it may not be respected is immediately to inform the Central Authority of its State. That Central Authority is responsible for ensuring that appropriate measures are taken.

Article 34 states that if the competent authority of the State of destination of a document so requests, a certified translation must be furnished. Unless otherwise arranged, the costs of translation are to be borne by the prospective adoptive parents.

Article 35 provides that the competent authorities of Contracting States are to act expeditiously in processing adoptions covered by the Convention.

For States having two or more systems of law with regard to adoption applicable in different territorial units, Article 36 states that (a) any reference to habitual residence in that State is to be construed as referring to habitual residence in a territorial unit of that State; (b) any reference to the law of that State is to be construed as referring to the law in force in the relevant territorial unit of that State; (c) any reference to the competent or public authorities of that State is to be construed as referring to those authorities authorized to act in the relevant territorial unit; and (d) any reference to accredited bodies of that State shall be construed as referring to bodies accredited in the relevant territorial unit.

For a State that, with regard to adoption, has two or more systems of law applicable to different categories of persons, Article 37 provides that any reference to the law of that State is to be construed as referring to the legal system specified by the law of that State.

Article 38 provides that a Contracting State within which different territorial units have their own laws with regard to adoption shall not be bound to apply the Convention where a state with a uniform system of law would not be bound to do so. In other words, the Convention would not govern adoptions within the United States when the child moves from one U.S. jurisdiction to another.

Article 39 states that the Convention does not affect any international agreement or other instrument to which Contracting States are Parties and which contains provisions on matters governed by the Convention unless a contrary declaration has been made by the Contracting States to such agreement or other instrument. Article 39(2) was already mentioned in connection with Article 25.

Article 40 prohibits countries becoming parties to the Convention from making any reservations.

Article 41 provides that the Convention shall apply in every case where an application by persons habitually resident in a Contracting State who wish to adopt a child habitual resident in another such State has been received by the Central Authority in the State of their habitual residence after the Convention has entered into force in that State and the State of origin of the child they wish to adopt.

Article 42 provides that the Secretary General of the Hague Conference on Private International Law is to convene at regular intervals a special commission to review the practical operation of the Convention.

Chapter VII (Articles 43-48), with its final clauses, sets out the usual types of provisions concerning signature and ratification of the Convention, accession to the Convention, when the Convention shall enter into force, how the Convention may be denounced and when the denunciation will be effective, and the notification requirements to be met by the depositary -- the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

According to Article 43, the Convention is open for signature and ratification, acceptance or approval by States which were Member States of the Hague Conference on Private International Law at the time of its Seventeenth (1993) Session and by the other States which participated in that Session.

\1\ Member States as of the seventeenth Session of the Hague Conference on Private International Law:

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, China, Denmark, Egypt, Finland, France, Federal Republic of Germany, Greece, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Luxembourg, Mexico, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Spain, Suriname, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of America, Uruguay, Venezuela and Yugoslavia.

Non-member States that participated in the eighteenth session:

Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Madagascar, Mauritius, Peru, Philippines, Romania, Senegal, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Viet Nam.

Article 44 provides that other States may accede to the Convention after it has entered into force (which occurred on May 1, 1995), such accessions to have effect only as regards the relations between the acceding State and those Contracting States which have not objected to that State's accession in the six months after receipt of the notification of accession. Such an objection is also possible for States ratifying, accepting or approving the Convention after an accession.

Article 45 establishes that if a State has two or more territorial units in which different systems of law are applicable concerning Convention adoptions, it may declare that the Convention will extend to all of its territorial units, or only to one or more of those units. Such a declaration may be modified at any time. Article 45(3) further directs that if a State makes no declaration under this provision, the Convention shall presumptively extend to all territorial units of that State.

Purusant to Article 46, the Convention entered into force on May 1, 1995, following its ratification by three States. For every State subsequently ratifying the Convention or acceding to it, the Convention enters into force, in accordance with Article 46(2), on the first day of the month following the expiration of three months after the deposit of its instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession.

Article 47 provides that a Contracting State to the Convention may denounce the Convention in writing, such denunciation taking effect on the first day of the month following the expiration of twelve months after the notification is received by the depositary, unless the denunciation specifies a longer period of time.

Provided that the Senate gives advice and consent to U.S. ratification, the U.S. instrument of ratification would not be deposited until congressional enactment of necessary implementing legislation and until appropriate steps have been taken pursuant to that legislation to enable the United States fully to implement the Convention.

I believe that the United States, as the world's major receiving country of children made available by other States for intercountry adoption, should embrace the internationally agreed norms and procedures that it helped develop for the protection of children involved in intercountry adoptions and for the protection of the interests of their birth and adoptive parents.

I therefore recommend that this Convention be transmitted to the Senate at an early date for its advice and consent to ratification, subject to the declaration previously described.

Respectfully submitted,
Strobe Talbott.
[End of document]