![]() | The State Department web site below is a permanent electronic archive of information released prior to January 20, 2001. Please see www.state.gov for material released since President George W. Bush took office on that date. This site is not updated so external links may no longer function. Contact us with any questions about finding information. NOTE: External links to other Internet sites should not be construed as an endorsement of the views contained therein. |
International Narcotics Control Strategy Report, 1998 Released by the Bureau for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs, U.S.Department of State Washington, DC, February 1999 THAILAND I. Summary Throughout 1998, Thailand continued its long tradition of cooperation with the United States and the international community in anti-drug programs. Thailand cemented its role as a leader in regional drug control programs by co-establishing the International Law Enforcement Academy (ILEA) with the U.S. in Bangkok. Despite a serious domestic methamphetamine abuse problem and deep government budget cutbacks, Thailand continued to cooperate fully with the U.S. in narcotics law enforcement and drug control efforts. Legal and judicial cooperation also became more streamlined. Additional defendants arrested in 1994's operation "Tiger Trap" were extradited to the U.S., and new cooperative law enforcement programs were initiated. Thailand's agreement to extradite to the U.S. Thai citizens and residents who claim Thai citizenship continued to expand from a base of near zero four years ago to a total of six individuals extradited in 1997 and five in 1998. Thailand has one of the most effective narcotic crop control programs in the world. USG analysts estimated that Thailand's opium production in the 1998 growing season declined 36 percent to 16 metric tons. Cultivation decreased by 18 percent. Reflecting trends of previous years, opium farmers continue to cultivate smaller, more isolated fields and engage in multiple cropping to avoid eradication. A drought last year adversely affected the production of all agricultural commodities, including opium. The 1999 eradication campaign was inaugurated in mid-November 1998. A concentrated effort in December and January will be necessary, however, to destroy the poppy before it can be harvested. Activities related to heroin production, such as the refining of raw opium into morphine base, continued in northern border areas where drug producers often combined heroin operations with the manufacture of methemphetamines. Thailand has yet to become a party to the 1988 UN Drug Convention due to its lack of anti-money laundering legislation. A bill is currently in House/Senate committee where differences over the types of predicate crimes covered are being debated. The Royal Thai Government (RTG) remains committed to the passage of a law with as broad application as possible. Seizures and court actions under the asset seizure law continued. With DEA support, the Thai Police established the first in a series of specially trained narcotics law enforcement units to target major trafficking groups. Thailand's programs aimed at treatment, epidemiology of substance abuse, and demand reduction were maintained and continue to be effective. Drug trafficking and abuse, notably methamphetamine use among students, was especially troubling to Thai society over the past year while, at the same time, drug control agencies, including the Narcotics Control Board, the police, and education and treatment organizations faced budgetary cutbacks resulting from fiscal austerity programs. II. Status of Country The importance of Thailand as a source of opiates for the international market continued to decline in 1998. Thailand's opium poppy crop accounts for less than one percent of the regional production of opiates. Opium from Burma is necessary to satisfy Thai internal demand. The spread of methaemphetamine is a serious concern as traffickers in Thailand, Laos, and Burma are producing and/or dealing in both opiates and stimulants. Thailand's importance as a transit country diminished somewhat as smugglers have developed new smuggling routes. Nevertheless, good roads in northern Thailand connect refineries in Burma with the remainder of Thailand's excellent transport system. Thailand's position as a regional airline hub is also important. The trade in arms, precursor chemicals and other supplies into Burma, and the outflow of drugs from that country have diversified over the past three years through China, Laos, and Vietnam. Thailand still produces marijuana in the northeast, although this production has been reduced due to the intervention of police and security forces in recent years. There continue to be reports of marijuana cultivation in the northern and southern regions of the country. Out of domestic political necessity, Thailand has shifted drug control resources from the traditional heroin and marijuana targets to the domestic methamphetamine problem. Like heroin, methamphetamine is mainly produced in and enters the Kingdom from Burma. Seizure and arrest data and treatment prevalence for stimulant abuse indicate a rapidly growing problem, especially among students. As a result of the inflow of methamphetamine, Thailand has experienced an increase of polydrug use among traditional heroin users such as the hill tribes in the north and fishermen in the south. Hill tribe abusers continue to abandon opium for heroin and methamphetamine. There were also unconfirmed reports that traffickers associated with the United Wa State Army (UWSA) in Burma are producing the stimulant "Ecstasy" for the Thai urban youth market. Existing heroin trafficking routes have now been expanded for use in trafficking methamphetamines. A study of the drug abuse situation in Thailand published in 1995 by the Thai Development and Research Institute (TDRI) continues to be a baseline estimate of drug abuse in Thailand-1.27 million drug users. This figure comprises those abusing stimulants and inhalants, heroin, opium, and marijuana. III. Country Actions Against Drugs in 1998 Policy Initiatives. Despite the current climate of budgetary austerity, Thailand continues support for programs to combat the production and trafficking of illicit drugs. National level plans, implemented by various agencies and coordinated through the Office of the Narcotics Control Board (ONCB), are designed to integrate enforcement, treatment, public awareness and demand reduction programs. Strategies to improve control and increase interdiction capabilities along Thailand's porous borders are currently under consideration. With DEA support, the Thai Police established the first in a series of specially trained narcotics law enforcement units to target major trafficking groups. Thai initiatives also include improved cross-border cooperation with Burmese enforcement authorities in an attempt to stem the flow of stimulants smuggled from Burma. Based on its successes and experience, Thailand has been a leader in organizations like ASEAN and the United Nations. Recently, the RTG co-founded an International Law Enforcement Academy (ILEA) in Bangkok with the U.S. The ILEA will provide regional law enforcement and criminal justice officials with the opportunity to improve their professional skills, and share information and foster coordination in countering narcotics and transnational crime. Thailand actively participates in the sub-regional action mechanism that has established cooperation and dialogue on narcotics issues under UN auspices among six countries: China, Burma, Laos, Thailand, Vietnam and Cambodia. In 1998, the Prime Minister issued two orders designed to mobilize and organize counter-narcotics activities. Prime Minister's Order 141 aims to facilitate collaboration among all government agencies as well interested parts of civil society, such as NGO's, professional organizations, and religious groups, under the leadership of the Ministry of Interior. PM Order 141 focuses on the interception of drug smuggling along Thailand's northern border and has the ONCB as its main coordinating agency. Thailand is largely in compliance with the 1988 UN Convention, except for not having a money laundering law. It has and enforces laws against the cultivation, production, distribution, sale, transport, and financing of illicit drugs. The asset seizure and conspiracy law which was passed in 1991 continued to generate cases and forfeiture actions last year. As of August 31, 1998, 439 cases opened under the asset seizure and conspiracy statutes accounted for over $22 million seized or frozen. Fifty-one other cases still under investigation of major trafficking organizations involve sums of over $15 million dollars in assets. Accomplishments. The Foreign Ministry, the judiciary, the Royal Thai Police, and the Office of the Attorney General have developed expedited extradition mechanisms and have worked closely with U.S. legal experts. Although the Ministry of Foreign Affairs also published extradition guidelines that could potentially impede extraditions of Thai citizens, overall cooperation has remained strong. Since 1994, the Thai government has cooperated in extraditing 38 defendants and/or fugitives to the U.S., thirty-two of which involved narcotics-related crimes. Sixteen individuals were extradited (15 narcotics-related) in 1997, and fourteen (11 narcotics-related) in 1998. Five of the fourteen individuals extradited in 1998 were Thai nationals. Others extradited include remaining fugitives under 1994's operation "Tiger Trap" and defendants ranging from West African traffickers to Thai and Chinese syndicate operators and brokers. There is one narcotics-related case in custody appealing extradition, and three others in custody facing Thai charges prior to extradition proceedings being initiated. Controls exist in Thailand on precursor chemicals named in the 1988 UN Drug Convention. Thai and Laotian officials have also agreed to cooperate regarding the control of precursor chemicals. There is an active governmental and non-governmental involvement in demand reduction activities at both the national and local level. Thai NGO activities are coordinated through the anti-narcotics coordinating committee (ANCC). Thailand is active in international therapeutic community programs and again hosted the International Federation of NGO's for the Prevention of Drug and Substance Abuse and the Colombo Plan grouping of therapeutic communities conferences in 1998. Thailand is a member of the UN Commission on Narcotic Drugs (CND) and is the designated law enforcement coordinator for ASEAN's Senior Officials on Drugs (ASOD) group. A drug epidemiology working group reports on emerging drug abuse trends and participates in regional fora. Law Enforcement Efforts. The Office of the Narcotics Control Board (ONCB), the Police Narcotics Suppression Bureau (PNSB) and most recently, the Royal Thai Army, Third Region Command covering North Thailand, are the entities primarily responsible for the implementation of national level drug enforcement programs. These agencies coordinate with local police and enforcement bodies such as border patrol police, provincial police and Royal Thai Customs on narcotics cases. Training of local units by ONCB and PNSB continues. The Northern Drug Task Force is staffed by officials from both ONCB and PNSB who jointly develop drug investigations. A second task force in the Bangkok area became operational in 1996 and is soon to be reinvigorated by inclusion in a DEA/Thai police special program. The third in southern Thailand continues preparations for activation in the near future. A program to enhance maritime interdiction capabilities of the Royal Thai Navy in the Gulf of Thailand is under development. The United States has continued to support these organizations through provision of operational assistance, commodities, and training provided jointly by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the Department of Defense (DOD) and the State Department Bureau for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL). Enforcement actions by the border patrol police in northern Thailand have produced seizures of opiates and methane. The Border Patrol Police have also received training from DEA and DOD elements this year. During 1998, a new interagency initiative supported by the USG, sponsored a series of programs designed to increase judicial cooperation with RTG authorities. Under this "Professionals in Residence Program", an Assistant U.S. Attorney and a U.S. Federal Judge worked directly with the Thai Attorney General's Department and the Ministry of Justice. Digital video conferencing has also been a feature of the program, bringing together Thai judicial and enforcement officials with U.S. legal experts in live video conferences. U.S. and Thai officials cooperate in international investigations, including cases involving West African trafficking groups and other international syndicates. Thai officials also cooperated with neighboring countries through outreach, training and liaison, and supported regional training initiatives of their own as well as hosting DEA training programs. According to ONCB figures, about a quarter ton of heroin was seized during the first eight months of 1998. Drug related arrest cases totaled almost 105,000 during the first eight months of the year, reflecting both the growth in the use of drugs and governmental efforts to counteract it. Corruption. The Royal Thai Government does not condone the cultivation, production, trafficking, or financing of illicit narcotics. The Police Narcotics Suppression Bureau and the Office of the Narcotics Control Board continue to exhibit a high degree of professionalism and honesty derived in part from long standing relationships and institution-building programs with international drug control organizations, including those from the United States. But, narcotics-related corruption remains an open secret in Thailand. Army and police departments lack the necessary internal mechanisms to punish high ranking corrupt officials. Usually the culprit is transferred to an inactive post until the matter is forgotten. However, as middle and upper class Thai youth fall victim to burgeoning methamphetamine use and other drug-related problems, blind eye acceptance of corruption appears to be lessening. Thailand's exceptionally open and free press has sensitized more to the problem while modestly strengthening government reformers. Long-standing institution-building by the USG and other donors appears to be the best method to bring about corrective change. Narcotics trafficking poses special problems in countering corruption because of the fantastic profits generated and the resultant availability of cash for either facilitating payoffs or completely co-opting law enforcement personnel. Stories of narco-corruption abound in the Thai media while little effective action against corruption is ever reported. On the other hand, American law enforcement officials have noted that security of complex operations against major traffickers has been maintained which indicates an internal sensitivity to the issue as well as knowledge of those police officers and other governmental officials who can or cannot be trusted with easily saleable, sensitive information. Agreements and Treaties. Once Thailand implements money laundering laws, it will have fulfilled all requirements for compliance with the 1988 UN Drug Convention. The U.S.-Thai Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) that went into effect in 1993 continued to prove useful this past year. U.S. drug-related requests for assistance under the MLAT have been consistently honored by the Royal Thai Government. Thailand has also been extremely cooperative with the U.S. under the 1991 Extradition Treaty and high-profile cases have resulted in an ever increasing number of extraditions. Cultivation/Production. The northern border areas of Thailand are the principal location for poppy cultivation in the country, although the RTG also reported an increase in poppy cultivation in Tak province in the lower north in 1998. Opium has a long history in the region, and the use of the crop as a medicine and source of cash for certain hill tribe communities has been a fact of social and economic life. The government's control efforts have combined eradication of the crop with development, improved infrastructure, and economic support designed to offer growers alternatives to narcotics production. Thailand has one of the most successful narcotic crop control programs in the world. Over the past twenty years efforts to discourage cultivation and later to penalize growers through an active eradication campaign have proven effective. The eradication campaign is one of the main reasons refineries no longer operate in Thailand, and has reduced opium cultivation in Thailand to a point where opium must now be imported to meet the requirements of domestic addiction. Thailand's crop control programs have resulted in a reduction of the amount of poppy grown from an estimate of up to 200 metric tons produced in the 1970's, to 16 metric tons based on U.S. estimates in 1998. Opium yield was estimated in 1998 at 11.5 kilograms per hectare. Last season's reduction in the poppy crop resulted from a more aggressive eradication effort, and a drop in cultivation-which is the ultimate goal of the program. A serious drought last year also reduced crop yields. The Thai Government estimates that only ten percent of Thai poppy growers use opium themselves, and even these sell their higher quality product for cash and consume cheaper drugs from Burma. Since brokers and middlemen play a strong role in the production equation and influence hill tribe growers, the incentive to plant a crop exists, even with the risk of having it destroyed by the government. Evolving opium cultivation practices of out-of-season poppy planting and multiple cropping require much more effort and capital, and thus reflect the significant adjustments traditional growers have had to make in the face of eradication efforts. A mark of the growers' sophistication is the practice of interspersing the poppy plants with legitimate vegetable production. Sometimes, after the eradication officials destroy the poppies, the field owner duns the local government for the collateral damage to the legitimate crops, the owner only admitting to lawful agriculture and blaming a sneaky unknown neighbor for the illegal crop. The stubbornness and greed of Thailand's residual growers and their ability to increase cultivation in some geographically difficult to control areas argue for continued active support for the opium control program. An important initiative in crop control supported by the U.S. and other donors has been the establishment of Chiang Mai University's Highland Agricultural Training Center. Opened in 1994 with assistance from the Government of Japan, this center provides hands-on training and experience to farmers in alternative crop techniques and provides a site for training farmers from neighboring countries. Methodology. The RTG in an effort coordinated and implemented by the Office of the Narcotics Control Board (ONCB) and with cooperation from the army and police authorities annually surveys the opium crop in Thailand. The RTG survey and analysis methodology has continually benefited from updating by empirical data collected in situ and is unmatched in the region. Both ground and aerial surveys are used. Survey data is shared with eradication campaign operating units. ONCB executes its survey before, during and after the traditional opium cultivation window to cover early and late season crops. Over the past years, however, ONCB conclusions have reflected more cautious estimates of cultivation trends than the USG survey. The USG estimation for the 1997 survey was a 24 percent decrease from the 1996 estimate, while ONCB estimated a 12 percent increase for the same period. Drug Flow/Transit. Thai opium production is dwarfed by the amount of opium produced elsewhere in Southeast Asia, especially that from Burma. Opiates move into Thailand for consumption and also for onward shipment to world markets, making Thailand both a consumption and a transit country. Over the past several years, and especially since Khun Sa's "retirement," and the occupation of his former territory by the Burma Army, there has been a steady increase in the use of alternate routes, mainly through China but also through Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam. Criminals take advantage of opportunities presented by countries with relatively weak law enforcement as well as the superior transportation infrastructure, financial systems, and international cargo handling facilities provided by Thailand's sophisticated economy. Unfortunately, neither Thailand nor its regional law enforcement partners have the police intelligence data to provide a breakout of tonnage or trafficking patterns in the region. Demand Reduction and Treatment Programs. Prevention and demand reduction programs are coordinated through ONCB and managed by various government agencies, with activities coordinated through the Anti-Narcotics Coordinating Committee (ANCC). There are programs in place with the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Education to expand treatment and demand reduction in schools and in provincial areas as well as to target specific high-risk groups including students, fishermen, laborers, and long-haul truck drivers. A longer term program within the Health Ministry aims to increase the number of treatment facilities and spaces in therapeutic community settings for detoxification and after care. Thailand is in the forefront in the utilization of the therapeutic community and narcotics anonymous models in treatment. The government and NGO's have undertaken studies of drug abuse patterns in various population sectors. IV U.S. Policy Initiatives and Programs Based on guidelines in the national strategy, U.S. goals and objectives in Thailand are: To reduce the amount of illicit drugs (principally heroin) available in the United States by assisting Thailand to counter the threat of drug trafficking and support actions targeting drug traffickers and their organizations. Once Thailand enacts anti-money laundering legislation, assist with programs to implement these new laws and with developing other legal and enforcement tools, such as a strengthened conspiracy law and development of a plea bargaining system. Through continued cooperative investigations, indict traffickers and cooperate in extraditions to the United States. Work toward broadening allowable evidence rules in the Thai legal system to enable more prosecutions and convictions of high-level traffickers in Thailand. Continue initiatives to reduce and eliminate opium poppy cultivation through eradication and development of viable economic alternatives for farmers. Assist Thailand in its efforts to maintain and expand its drug abuse awareness and demand reduction activities. Assist Thailand with continued efforts to improve and streamline its drug control institutions by fostering inter-agency cooperation and institutional development. Assist Thailand's efforts in outreach and cross-border enforcement, development and demand reduction programs and support Thailand's emergence as a center for the transfer of development technology, for drug abuse training, and for individual law enforcement officer skills building, institution building, and regional building of transnational networks and cooperative mechanisms at the International Law Enforcement Academy in Bangkok. Bilateral Cooperation. In addition to the Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) and the Extradition Treaty referred to elsewhere in this report, four State Department funded bilateral project agreements continue in force: Narcotics Law Enforcement: projects designed to improve the ability of narcotics law enforcement agencies in responding to the threat posed by powerful trafficking organizations. this agreement provides commodity and training support for ONCB, PNSB and other Thai law enforcement organizations, and supports efforts aimed at improving institutions and judicial cooperation. Narcotics Crop Control: funding is provided to the Royal Thai Army Third Region (3 RTA), the ONCB, border patrol police (BPP) and Provincial Police (PP) to assist the Royal Thai Government in surveying, locating, and eradicating the illicit opium poppy crop in northern Thailand and with some outreach and development initiatives through organizations like the Army and Chiang Mai University. Demand Reduction: designed to assist Thai authorities to improve and expand demand reduction programs and to increase private sector and NGO involvement in the national drug abuse awareness effort, and to target specific drug abuse problem areas. Regional Initiatives: a project with the objective of supporting Thailand's efforts at coordination, outreach and training for countries in the region. Funds from this are also dedicated to support the Bangkok International Law Enforcement Academy. DEA works closely with Thai drug agencies in investigating major heroin trafficking organizations, providing training to develop Thai drug enforcement capabilities. The U.S. Customs Service and Department of Defense have cooperated with various agencies on anti-smuggling projects. In November 1998, four Thai Customs officials attended a State Department-funded U.S. Customs Regional Airport Interdiction Course in Penang, Malaysia. DOD is also supporting training initiatives with selected border patrol and narcotics police units, and has assisted the establishment of the regional drug task forces. The United States Information Service (USIS) arranges visitor programs for consultations on drug control issues and is currently managing the professionals in residence program in judicial affairs mentioned above. USIS also organizes video conferences allowing experts in the U.S. and Thailand to consult on narcotics, judicial, and law enforcement issues. USIS regularly highlights significant narcotics-related stories and prepares press releases and conferences on narcotics issues. The Road Ahead. Thailand will continue as a regional leader in drug control and law enforcement. The Kingdom will also cooperate fully with the international community in this regard. Domestically, Thailand's political development will continue to lag behind its social and economic sophistication, but, as evidenced by the new constitution, the traditional politics of influence and cronyism is under pressure from an increasingly educated populace and economic imperatives to move toward more rational and objective political behavior patterns and legal structures. Money laundering legislation currently under consideration by a joint House/Senate committee reflects some of the changes in Thai politics, and also some of the continuing problems. Other useful additions to Thailand's management of its law enforcement problems would be a robust conspiracy law, the introduction of plea bargaining, and the broadening of evidence rules. All of the above legal instruments either help take the profit out of narco-trafficking or assist the criminal justice system with making cases against major traffickers and investors in illicit activities. The U.S. and Thailand look forward to continued broad ranging law enforcement cooperation. Additional extraditions are expected, and the strengthening of Thai legal and judicial processes and the political system auger well for the future. The crop control program will be maintained. Regional cooperation will greatly expand through the International Law Enforcement Academy in Bangkok. Thailand should continue to develop systems of internal control and legal and administrative tools to counter the destabilizing impact of corruption and the influence of organized criminal groups. As Thailand has established its reputation in anti-narcotics efforts, neighboring countries have been encouraged to follow aspects of the Thai model. It is in the interest of the U.S. to help Thailand succeed. [end of document]
| Statistical Tables | |||||||||||||
| TABLES for CY | 1998 | 1997 | 1996 | 1995 | 1994 | 1993 | 1992 | 1991 | 1990 | ||||
| OPIUM | |||||||||||||
| Harvestable Cultivation | [ha] | 1,350 | 1,650 | 2,170 | 1,750 | 2,110 | 2,880 | 2,050 | 3,000 | 3,435 | |||
| Eradication | [ha] | 715 | 1,050 | 880 | 580 | 0 | 0 | 1,580 | 1,200 | 720 | |||
| Cultivation [a] | [ha] | 2,065 | 2,700 | 3,050 | 2,330 | 2,110 | 2,880 | 3,630 | 4,200 | 4,155 | |||
| Potential Yield* | [mt] | 16 | 25 | 30 | 25 | 17 | 42 | 24 | 35 | 40 | |||
| CANNABIS | |||||||||||||
| Harvestable Cultivation | [ha] | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||
| Eradication | [ha] | 0 | 0 | 85 | 80 | 85 | 80 | 85 | 59 | 114 | |||
| Seizures** | |||||||||||||
| Opium | [mt] | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 0.8 | |||
| Heroin | [mt] | 0.230 | 0.170 | 0.390 | 0.690 | 1.100 | 2.100 | 0.992 | 1.500 | 1.100 | |||
| Cannabis | [mt] | 5.1 | 12 | 44 | 46 | 71 | 98 | 87 | 54 | 130 | |||
| Other data | |||||||||||||
| Heroin Labs destroyed | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 2 | ||||
| Methamphetamine Labs Destroyed | 15 | 0 | 1 | ||||||||||
| Narcotics Arrests (in thousands) | 104 | 95 | 125 | 120 | 102 | 85 | 73 | 75 | 56 | ||||
| Opium Consumed (estimate) | [mt] | 60.0 | 60.0 | 60.0 | 60.0 | 53.0 | 53.0 | 53.0 | 53.0 | 53.0 | |||
| Heroin Consumed (estimate) | [mt] | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 | |||
| Opium Users (in thousands) | 111 | 111 | 111 | 111 | 35,000 | 35,000 | 35,000 | 35,000 | 35,000 | ||||
| Heroin Users (in thousands) | 220 | 220 | 220 | 220 | 220 | 220 | 220 | 220 | 220 | ||||
| *Figure based on December 1991-February 1992 Opium Yield Study. Average yield / hectare is 11.5 kg. Opium in Thailand isgenerally cultivated, harvested and eradicated from October to February each year. To make the data consistent with seizure and processing data, opium seasons are identified by the calendar year in which they end. For example, the October 1996 to February 1997 opium season is referred to as the 1997 calendar year season. Data on opium cultivation, eradication, and production are based on USG estimates. RTG estimates are often lower on cultivation and higher on eradication. Data on opium cultivation, eradication, and production are based on RTG and USG estimates. RTG estimates are lower on cultivation. In 1995,opium yield was increased from the figure reported in 1994. | |||||||||||||
| Last season's crop declined in part because of weather, aided by an effective eradication campaign, aided by an lower initial amount of cultivation by farmers. These data are based on USG imagery and technical analysis. Loss is estimated at 10 percent. Consumption figures for heroin and opium have been revised, based on the new baseline study published by the Thai in 1995. TDRI estimated the number of heroin addicts in Thailand at 219,391 as of December 1993. Opium addicts are estimated at 111,000 in the same study. Seizure and arrest information is based on both USG and RTG figures. End-of-year estimates of seizures are projected from figures through the report date or earlier in the year. Consumption and addiction figures are based on a dated ONCB estimate of 35,000 hilltribe opium addicts. Northern Thailand is part of a fluid regional opium and heroin market that transcends borders with Burma and Laos. Some opium produced in Burma and Laos is consumed or refined in Thailand, and vice versa. Since the best recent data indicate that Thailand is a net importer of opiates, the net amount available for export and refining into heroin is zero. Small-scale heroin labs are set up in Thailand from time to time. Their overall production is no doubt small in comparison to labs in Burma and Laos, but the actual amount cannot be determined on the basis of available information. The first serious attempt to estimate the number of heroin addicts in Thailand was made in 1990, using a capture-recapture model. On the basis of not fully verified data, an estimate of 132,275 addicts was made. A more rigorous study was conducted in 1991 by the US Centers for Disease Control, in conjunction with Thai authorities. The study was limited to Bangkok and produced an estimate of 36,600 heroin addicts. ONCB estimates consumption at .2 grams per addict per day. Thailand consumes more opium than it produces. | |||||||||||||
| **1998 Seizures January -August only. | |||||||||||||