2010 Investment Climate Statement - Spain
The government of Spain recognizes the value of foreign investment and the economic importance of attracting more. There have been no significant changes in Spain's regulations for investment and foreign exchange under the Socialist Party (PSOE) government that took office in March 2004 and was re-elected in March 2008. Spanish law permits foreign investment of up to 100 percent of equity, and capital movements are completely liberalized. During the first nine months of 2009, gross new foreign direct investment in Spain was 10.8 billion euros, a decrease of 68 percent from the first nine months of 2008 (22.9 billion euros). The United Arab Emirates’ investment accounted for 30.6 percent of the total for the period of 9 months, the Netherlands 23 percent, Luxembourg 8.4 percent and the U.S. 4 percent. The autonomous community of Madrid received 85 percent of the investment and the region of Catalonia 12 percent. Companies invested especially in telecommunications, financial services, activities related to land transportation, manufacturing and chemicals, refined petroleum, and production and distribution of electricity. As for portfolio investment, in 2008 about 9.3 percent of Spanish negotiable instruments held by foreigners were held by Americans. Spain no longer has a big wage competitiveness advantage over other major EU economies. Many analysts have said that the country will therefore have to embark on additional structural reform if it wants to maintain previous years' high levels of foreign investment.
In April 1999, the adoption of royal decree 664/1999 eliminated the need for government authorization of any investments save those in activities "directly related to national defense," such as arms production. The decree abolished previous authorization requirements on investments in other sectors deemed of strategic interest, such as communications and transportation. It also removed all forms of portfolio investment authorization and established free movement of capital into Spain as well as Spanish capital out of the country. As a result, Spanish law now conforms to multi-disciplinary EU Directive 88/361, part of which prohibits all restrictions of capital movements between member states as well as between such states and other countries, and which classifies investors according to residence rather than nationality.
Registration requirements are simple and straightforward, and apply to foreign and domestic investments equally. They aim to verify the purpose of the investment, and do not block any investment.
A process of privatization of state-owned firms began in the mid-1980s and has been carried out by both Socialist and Popular Party governments in several stages. Spain’s privatization process was especially intense between 1996 and 2000, when large utilities and industrial groups, as Telefonica, Tabacalera, Repsol, and Endesa, among others, were completely privatized. However, several of these companies maintain a de facto monopoly position under private ownership, and a high degree of sector concentration persists years after the main privatizations, reflecting the slow progress of competition in those sectors. U.S. companies have successfully participated in several purchases. In 2004 the government began the privatization of the railroad system. Effective January 1, 2005, the GOS dissolved the National Rail Network (RENFE) and formed two new companies, ADIF and RENFE-Operadora, both of which remain under state control. In November 2009, Iberia Airlines, in which the government retains a small shareholding, confirmed that it had reached a preliminary agreement to merge with British Airways. Both airlines are expected to sign all merger agreements by the end of February 2010, and the merger is expected to be completed by March. Another deferred privatization is that of the government’s remaining 20 percent stake in the Spanish electricity grid, Red Electrica Espanola, which has no projected date of completion.
The Spanish government has liberalized the energy, electricity, and telecommunications markets to varying degrees. These efforts have opened Spain's economy to new investment, including by U.S. companies. However, many observers feel these changes have not been broad enough to fully stimulate the economy. For example, in the telecommunications sector, many analysts believe that Telefonica's dominant position undermines competition and innovation. It is frequently difficult for new entrants to gain traction in sectors dominated by former state-run monopolies such as Telefonica. Moreover, in the energy sector, the government clearly has concerns about possible foreign control of "national champion" companies.
Third Party Indicators:
|TI Corruption Index||2009||32 (out of 180)|
|Heritage Economic Freedom||2010||36 (out of 183)|
|World Bank Doing Business||2010||62 (out of 183)|
There are no controls on capital flows. In February 1992, Royal Decree 1816/1991 provided complete freedom of action in financial transactions between residents and non-residents of Spain. Previous requirements for prior clearance of technology transfer and technical assistance agreements were eliminated. The liberal provisions of this law apply to payments, receipts, and transfers generated by foreign investments in Spain. Capital controls on the transfer of funds outside the country were abolished in 1991. Remittances of profits, debt service, capital gains and royalties from intellectual property can all be effected at market rates using commercial banks.
Expropriation and Compensation
Spanish legislation sets up a series of safeguards that virtually prohibit the nationalization or expropriation of foreign investment. No expropriation or nationalization of foreign investment has taken place in recent years. There are no outstanding investment disputes between the United States and Spain. However, property owners in the autonomous community (region) of Valencia complained in 2007 that regional authorities unfairly took land or paid inadequate compensation in eminent domain cases for commercial development.
Legislation establishes mechanisms to solve disputes if they arise. The judicial system is open and transparent, although slow-moving at times. The Spanish judicial system is independent of the executive; therefore, the government is obliged to follow court rulings. Judges are in charge of prosecution and criminal investigation, which permits greater independence. The Spanish prosecution system allows for successive appeals to a higher Court of Justice. The European Court of Justice can hear the final appeal. In addition, the Government of Spain abides by rulings of the International Court of Justice at The Hague. Spain is a member of both the International Center for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) and the New York Convention of 1958 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.
Contractual disputes between American individuals/companies and Spanish entities are normally handled appropriately. There is no U.S.-Spain agreement on the mutual recognition of judgments, so U.S. citizens seeking to execute American court judgments in Spain must follow Spanish law, in this instance a complicated procedure known as the "exequator" process. In light of the Embassy's past experience in attempting to assist American citizen claimants with the process, the Embassy recommends that Americans who conclude contracts with Spanish entities specifying the U.S. as the venue for adjudicating disputes also obtain an agreement regarding how a possible U.S. judgment will be executed in Spain.
Spain has a fair and transparent bankruptcy regime. The 2001 bankruptcy of a Spanish company previously controlled by U.S. investors led to protracted litigation after the company’s laid-off employees filed a complaint with the National Prosecutor’s Office. Prosecutors charged eight U.S. investors with fraudulent bankruptcy, corporate malfeasance, and tax fraud. The case has been sent to the National Court for trial, but no date has been set. However, the judge has called upon the defendants to post a prohibitive bond. In June 2003, the Spanish Parliament approved a new, modern bankruptcy law that entered into force on September 1, 2004.
Performance Requirements and Incentives
Performance requirements are not used to determine the eligibility or level of incentives granted to investors. A range of investment incentives exist in Spain, and they are provided according to the authorities granting incentives and the type and purpose of the incentives.
Authorities that provide incentives in Spain:
The European Union:
-The European Union provides incentives primarily to projects that focus on economically depressed regions or that benefit the European Union as a whole.
- The European Investment Bank provides global loans for small and medium enterprises as well as individual loans based upon Innovation 2010 Initiative criteria.
- The European Investment Fund provides guarantees and venture capital to small and medium-sized enterprises, focusing on the transportation, telecommunications and energy industries.
- There are various structural funds designed to fund initiatives which reduce the wealth disparity between member states. Most autonomous regions of Spain currently qualify for these programs.
- Financial incentives are routed through major Spanish banks such as the Instituto de Credito Oficial (ICO) and Banco Bilbao-Vizcaya Argentaria (BBVA), and must be applied for through the financial intermediary.
The Central Government:
- Spain’s central government provides numerous financial incentives for foreign investment, generally designed to complement EU financing. The Ministry of Industry, Tourism, and Commerce runs the State Organization for the Promotion and Attraction of Foreign Investment to assist businesses seeking investment opportunities. They provide support to foreign investors in both the pre and post-investment phases. A comprehensive list of incentive programs is available at its website, www.investinspain.org. Applications for these incentives should be made directly to the relevant government agency.
- Spain provides generous subsidies for job training and job creation. Projects designated as Investment and Employment may be eligible for further subsidies from the Government Employment Service (formerly the National Employment Institute).
- There are numerous industry-specific subsidies awarded based upon the National Plan for R&D and TI 2008-2011. In particular, Spain is emphasizing the development of green energy and R&D capabilities.
- The central government encourages the creation of small and medium-sized enterprises through the InnoEmpresa plan. This plan focuses on the industrial, construction, tourism, business, and services sectors.
The Regional Governments:
Spain’s 17 regional governments, known as Autonomous Communities, provide additional incentives for investments in their region. Many are similar to the incentives offered by the national government and the EU, but they are not all compatible. Most are granted on an annual basis. Incentives include: nonrefundable subsidies; special loan and credit terms and conditions; technical counseling and training courses; tax incentives; guarantees; and social security deductions.
Generally, the regional governments are responsible for the management of each type of investment. This provides a benefit to investors as each autonomous community has a specific interest in attracting investment that enhances its economy.
Types of incentives available:
-- Financial subsidies
-- Exemption from certain taxes
-- Preferential access to official credit
-- Reduction of burdens, with social security discounts to companies
-- Bonuses for acquisition of certain material
-- Customs exemption for certain imported goods
-- Real estate grants, and gratuitous or favorable land grants
-- Guarantees granted in credit operations
-- Loans with low interest, long maturities, and grace periods
-- Guarantee of dividends
-- Professional training and qualification
-- Indirect aid by means of supplying infrastructure facilities (accesses, services, communications, etc.)
Incentives from national, regional or municipal governments and the EU are granted to Spanish and foreign companies alike without discrimination.
Spain is in compliance with its WTO TRIMS [Trade-Related Investment Measures] obligations.
- Municipal corporations offer incentives to direct investment by facilitating infrastructure needs, granting licenses, and allowing for the operation and transaction of permits. Municipalities such as Madrid offer numerous support services for potential foreign investors. Local economic development agencies often provide free advice on the local business environment and relevant laws, administrative support, and connections to human capital in order to facilitate the establishment of new businesses. Usually they are designed to help ease the initial operations of direct investment.
Right to Private Ownership and Establishment
The Constitution protects private ownership. Spanish law establishes clear rights to private ownership, and foreign firms receive the same legal treatment as Spanish companies.
There is no discrimination against public or private firms with respect to local access to markets, credit, licenses and supplies. American construction companies note, however, that they have not been able to win public sector construction contracts. They have, however, won private sector construction contracts.
Protection of Property Rights
Spanish law protects property rights, with enforcement carried out at the administrative and judicial levels. Any decision by the Administration pertaining to property rights can be appealed first at the administrative level and then at the judicial level, which has three levels of court appeals. Property protection is effective in Spain, although the system is slow. The Spanish legal system fully recognizes property rights and facilitates their acquisition and disposition. Mortgages are common in Spain.
Spanish patent, copyright, and trademark laws all approximate or exceed EU levels of intellectual property protection. Spain is a party to the Paris Convention, Bern Convention, the Madrid Accord on Trademarks, and the Universal Copyright Conventions. Spain has ratified the World Intellectual Property Organization's (WIPO) Copyright Treaty (WCT) and the WIPO Phonograms and Performances Treaty (WPPT), the so-called Internet treaties. In 2006, Spain passed legislation implementing the EU Copyright Directive, thereby also making the Internet treaties part of Spanish law. The GOS unveiled an anti-piracy action plan in April, 2005 which has enjoyed only limited success. The Internet presents the most problematic area in terms of respect for intellectual property rights in Spain. While law enforcement agencies are combating street piracy, Internet piracy has increased sharply over the past several years. U.S. copyright-based industries decry the steady decline in sales attributable to digital piracy and cite Spain as having one of the worst problems in the world in this regard. Negotiations between Internet Service Provider (ISP) and rights-holder groups on measures to curb and punish illegal file-sharing and downloading of protected content broke off in April 2009 and did not resume, despite the government’s efforts to bring the parties together. In January 2010, the government proposed legislation that would empower an Intellectual Property Committee affiliated with the Ministry of Culture, with prior judicial approval, to shut down pirate websites, but the legislation’s fate is uncertain. Moreover, a "Circular" issued in 2006 by the Prosecutor General's Office to guide prosecutors stated that peer-to-peer (P2P) downloading of protected content should not be prosecuted as a criminal offense unless a commercial profit motive can be established. While the Circular defines such activity as a civil wrong, there is a widespread public perception that P2P activity is legal. A number of legal obstacles also impede copyright holders from obtaining redress via civil litigation.
Public and private sector enforcement actions (especially private sector initiatives) using Spain's patent, copyright and trademark legal framework have increased. Industry groups praise police enforcement actions; their enforcement concerns have to do more with the judiciary than with Spain's police forces. Despite enforcement efforts, piracy remains a significant problem. Industry sources estimate that illegal CDs constitute 30 percent of the Spanish market, with pirated versions of new releases approaching 50 percent. Pirated software, videogames and DVDs are also sold widely, though the government, working closely with industry, has succeeded in reducing business software piracy.
Patents: A non-renewable 20-year period for working patents is available if the patent is used within the first three years. Spain permits both product and process patents.
Spain has ratified the 1973 Munich European Patent Convention allowing Spain to be designated in a European patent application. European patents are administered by the European Patent Office, based in Munich (Germany).
Copyrights: The law extends copyright protection to all literary, artistic or scientific creations, including computer software. Spain and the United States are members of the Universal Copyright Convention.
Trademarks: There are various procedures to register a trademark in Spain. The Spanish Office of Patents and Trademarks oversees protection for national trademarks. Trademarks registered in the Industrial Property Registry receive protection for a 10-year period from the date of application, which may be renewed. Protection is not granted for generic names, geographic names, those that violate Spanish customs or other inappropriate trademarks. Spanish authorities published a new Trademark law in 2001 (Law 17/2001), which came into effect in July 2002.
Applicants must designate the countries where they wish to obtain protection. The World International Property Organization (WIPO, headquartered in Geneva) oversees an international system of registration. However, this system only applies to U.S. firms with an establishment in a country that is a party of the Agreement or the Protocol.
Businesses may seek a trademark valid throughout the EU. The Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (OHIM) for the registration of community trademarks in the European Union started its operations in 1996. Its headquarters are located in Alicante:
Oficina de Harmonizacion del Mercado Interior (Office for
Harmonization in the Internal Market)
Avenida Aguilera, 20
Tel: (34) 96-513-9100
Fax: (34) 96-513-9173
Transparency of Regulatory System
Spain modernized its commercial laws and regulations following its 1986 entry into the EU. Its local regulatory framework compares favorably with other major European countries. Bureaucratic procedures have been streamlined and much red tape has been eliminated, though permitting and licensing processes can still suffer delays. Efficacy of regulation at the regional level is uneven.
Quasi-independent regulatory bodies exist in several sectors; however, they are for the most part still finding their role and fighting to assert their independence. Making the transition from state-owned monopolies to promoting full and open competition has been a slow, but steady, process.
The comment process for proposed rule-making changes is not as formal as in the United States. Spain does not have an official comment procedure for government regulations similar to what exists in the U.S. system. Most new laws and regulations are published as drafts before they go into force, but by the time they are published, there are often limited opportunities to change them. Government officials do seek out stakeholder comments before finalizing significant regulations, but the comment system is geared towards collecting input from officially recognized industry sector associations or consumer organizations. The general public will not necessarily be aware of a regulation until it is finalized and published.
Efficient Capital Markets and Portfolio Investment
The convergence of monetary policy following the adoption of the euro has led to a significant lowering of interest rates in recent years; however, the recent downgrade of Spanish sovereign debt may impact public financing costs. Foreign investors do not face discrimination when seeking local financing for projects. There is a large range of credit instruments available through Spanish and international financial institutions. Many large Spanish companies rely on cross-holding arrangements and ownership stakes by banks rather than pure loans. However, these arrangements do not act to restrict foreign ownership. Several of the largest Spanish companies that engage in this practice are also traded publicly in the U.S. There is a significant amount of portfolio investment in Spain, including by American entities. During 2008, Spain saw a decline in foreign investment flows in negotiable securities of 20.7 percent over the previous year. Accumulated foreign investment amounted to USD 820.5 million. 61.4 percent of this amount was in fixed rate securities, 38.4 percent in listed shares, and 0.2 percent in shares of investment funds. Investors were mostly from EU countries (87.6 percent) and the United States (9.3 percent.)
Corporate scandals in the U.S. and Europe, further integration of European capital markets, and efforts to make Spain a more attractive destination for foreign investment have led to several new initiatives to improve the transparency of capital markets and corporate governance. Spanish business organizations and private economic think tanks are proactive on corporate governance issues. In 2003 and 2004, Spanish business leaders created a progressive code of business practices and ethics. In 2004, Spanish regulatory agencies and lawmakers codified the business codes and required Spain's listed companies to follow a rigorous set of corporate governance and transparency rules.
Due to extensive cross-ownership within a small universe of dominant companies, Spanish corporations have traditionally not had truly independent board members. This situation is slowly changing, with several leading Spanish companies introducing independent members to their boards in an effort to improve transparency. Hostile takeover rules and in the past the threat of a government "Golden Share" veto have been used to prevent takeovers of companies. While surfacing on occasion in purely Spanish transactions, these defenses are most often used when the acquiring company is partially or wholly owned by other governments, with the Spanish government and securities regulators acting to prevent what they interpret as another government taking over a privatized Spanish company. A European Court of Justice decision has ruled such practices illegal. In 2006, parliament passed legislation abolishing the "Golden Share" whereby the government had to approve the sale of more than 10 percent of the shares in strategically important companies such as Telefonica, Endesa, Iberia and Repsol. Total assets for the six biggest banks in Spain by the end of 2008 were 2070.4 billion euros:
Banco Santander Central Hispano: 1,009.3 billion euros
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria: 543 billion euros
La Caixa: 260.8 billion euros
Caja Madrid: 180.9 billion euros
Banco Popular: 110.4 billion euros
Banco Sabadell Atlantico: 80.4 billion euros
As a result of conservative banking regulation and practices, Spain’s banking system was not directly affected by the U.S. subprime mortgage crisis that affected many banks in other European countries in 2008, although the system was hurt by the resulting international liquidity crisis. In response, the government increased deposit insurance, issued guarantees for some financial instruments, and purchased others, but it did not inject capital into financial institutions. A domestic housing slump that began in 2007 has had a greater impact, particularly on savings banks (“cajas”), many of which are heavily exposed to troubled construction and real estate companies. The authorities intervened in one caja in March 2009 and have created a fund that will be able to use up to 90 billion euros to help finance mergers. Several caja mergers are expected to take place during 2010.
In 2008, new Spanish gross investment abroad was USD 56.8 billion, showing a 64.6 percent decrease from the 2007 annual level. During the first nine months of 2009, Spanish authorities recorded USD 17.8 billion in new foreign direct investment, a decline of more than 65 percent compared with investment in the first nine months of 2008. For the year 2009, the Spanish government expects a relatively sharp decline (between 15 and 90 percent) in investment abroad. (Note: Detailed statistics on Spanish overseas investments and foreign investments in Spain for 2009 will be available by the end of March 2010.) The decrease in Spanish overseas investment reflects the impact of both the domestic and global economic crises on Spanish companies.Competition from State-owned Enterprises
Iberia, Spain’s national airline, which was a state-owned company for most of its history, faces fierce competition from the still state-owned railway company Renfe-Operadora, which offers high speed passenger service (“AVE”) between Madrid and Barcelona and other domestic routes. Private passenger bus companies also face competition from the AVE in pricing. Airlines and private bus companies have complained about unfair competition from the state-owned rail company, claiming that AVE tickets are being sold below cost for political reasons in a manner “that can be considered state aid.” Competition from the AVE, combined with the general economic crisis and concomitant decline in tourism, has caused a drop in passenger demand of 20% for bus transportation and about 10% for air travel over the last two years.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
Though it began later in Spain than in other advanced European economies, there is now a growing movement in favor of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Spanish companies consider corporate reputation, competitive advantage, and industry trends to be the major driving forces of CSR. Initiatives undertaken by the EU and international organizations have influenced companies' decision to implement CSR, and companies are increasingly adhering to its principles. Associations and fora that bring together the heads of leading corporations, business schools and other academic institutions, NGOs and the media are actively contributing to implementation of CSR in Spain. Although the amount of CSR is still moderate by international standards, in the last two decades there has been a growing interest in adopting CSR. Today, Spain’s largest energy, telecommunications, infrastructure, transport, financial services and insurance companies, among many others – including such companies as Repsol, Telefonica, Vodafone, Ferrovial, Renfe-Operadora, Unión Fenosa, Endesa, BBVA, BSCH and Mapfre - have increasingly undertaken CSR projects, and such practices are spreading throughout the economy. Regional savings banks (Cajas), prohibited by law from distributing profits, funnel their earnings into social and cultural activities. The Spanish government has taken some measures to promote CSR. In July 2002, the government set up a special commission to prepare a report to promote transparency among listed companies. The so-called Aldama Report of January 2003 focused attention on the duties and responsibilities of directors and proposed changes to the law to improve transparency in corporate governance that were included in a new law on transparency. The government endorsed the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, and the national point of contact is the Ministry of Industry, Tourism and Commerce.
The Government of Spain is involved in a long-running campaign against Basque Fatherland and Liberty (ETA), a terrorist organization founded in 1959 and dedicated to promoting Basque independence. ETA has traditionally targeted Spanish government officials, members of the military and security forces, journalists, and members of the Popular Party and Socialist Party for assassination. More broadly, symbolic targets include representatives of the Spanish state, security forces, and prominent industrialists. U.S. citizens and U.S. companies have not been ETA targets. ETA's main methods are car bombs and assassinations with firearms. ETA has killed more than 40 persons since January 2000 and more than 850 persons since its campaign began in 1968.
Suspected ETA operatives extort "revolutionary taxes" from businesspersons and professionals living in the Basque region, sometimes bombing their property or sending the demands to their children to intimidate them into paying extortion demands. ETA supporters also engage in street violence and vandalism against government facilities, economic targets (particularly banks), and the homes and property of persons opposed to ETA's cause. In early 2010, ETA publicly reaffirmed its commitment to continue to commit violent acts. ETA gunmen in late 2008 killed a Basque businessman whose construction company is involved in the construction of a high-speed rail linking the Basque cities of Bilbao, San Sebastian, and Vitoria to Madrid. In mid-2009, the group marked its 50th anniversary with a series of high-profile and deadly bombings. On July 29, ETA detonated an explosive-laden stolen van outside a Civil Guard barracks in Burgos. The blast injured more than 60 Civil Guards, spouses, and children. The following day, ETA murdered two Civil Guards in Mallorca with a car bomb. ETA had claimed its first victim of the year just weeks earlier when on June 19 it used a car bomb to assassinate a national police officer in the Basque region.
In recent years, the Spanish government has secured greater security cooperation from French authorities on the ETA threat. Joint Spanish-French operations over the past two years have resulted in a number of arrests, including the capture of the group's longtime military chief and his short-lived successor in that role in late 2008, followed by the detention of another suspected ETA military leader in April 2009 and its alleged political chief in October. Security services arrested 124 alleged ETA members, including 31 in France, in 2009. Joint operations also resulted in the seizure of more than a dozen arms caches through August 2009.
On March 11, 2004, Islamic terrorists killed 191 people on commuter trains headed for Madrid's central Atocha train station. Several foreign nationals died in the attack, although there were no American citizen casualties. Islamic extremists remain active in Spain and if there are other attacks, U.S. citizens/property could be hurt/damaged, although, so far, U.S. citizens and companies in Spain have not been direct Islamic terrorist targets. In the aftermath of the train bombings, the Spanish government mobilized against the threat and continues to fight aggressively against international terrorism.
Giving or accepting a bribe is a criminal act. Under the Section 1255 of the Spanish civil code, corporations and individuals are prohibited from deducting bribes from domestic tax computations.
Spain has a wide variety of laws, regulations, and penalties dealing with corruption. The legal regime has both civil and criminal sanctions for corruption, bribery, financial malfeasance, etc. The Spanish legal regime is hampered, however, by the fact that only natural persons (i.e., individuals), as opposed to legal persons (i.e., companies), can be held criminally liable for the actions of a company. Furthermore, civil and administrative proceedings cannot begin until there is a finding of criminal liability against a natural person. Although the Ministry of Justice has initiated an amendment process to provide for sanctions of legal persons, it has not yet become law.
On November 29, 2006 parliament passed a tough law against tax evasion that is designed, in part, to combat corruption. The government also issued two regulations imposing new requirements on banks and financial institutions to fight money laundering. Banks and financial institutions are also gearing up to meet stiff new EU regulations on money laundering.
Spain is a signatory of the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery, and Spanish officials attach importance to combating corruption. The government is working to amend domestic law to make the Convention a more useful investigative and prosecutorial tool.
The General State Prosecutor is authorized to investigate and prosecute corruption cases involving funds in excess of roughly USD 500,000. The Office of the Anti-Corruption Prosecutor, a subordinate unit of the General State Prosecutor, has 15-20 prosecutors in Madrid, Barcelona, and Valencia who are tasked with investigating and prosecuting domestic and international bribery allegations. There is also the "Audiencia Nacional," a corps of magistrates whose attributes include broad discretion to investigate and prosecute alleged instances of Spanish businesspeople bribing foreign officials.
Spain enforces anti-corruption laws on a generally uniform basis. Public officials are probably subjected to more scrutiny than private individuals, but several wealthy and well-connected business executives have been successfully prosecuted for corruption. There is no obvious bias for or against foreign investors. U.S. firms have not identified corruption as an obstacle to investment in Spain. Although no formal corruption complaints have been lodged, U.S. companies have indicated that they have been disqualified at times from public tenders based on reasons that these companies’ legal counsels did not consider justifiable. However, Spain’s ranking in Transparency International’s annual Corruption Perceptions Index has worsened in each of the last three years.
Conversations with representatives of the Spanish legal community indicate that the Convention is increasingly being taken into account in the drafting of contracts. Spanish companies, both domestic and multinational, are insisting that clauses protecting them against requests for bribes be inserted into business contracts. Tax evasion, particularly by those who work in cash-based sectors, has reportedly been heavy.
Bilateral Investment Agreements
Spain has concluded bilateral investment agreements with Hungary (1989), the Czech Republic (1990), Russia (1990), Argentina (1991), Chile (1991), Tunisia (1991), Egypt (1992), Poland (1992), Uruguay (1992), Paraguay (1993), Philippines (1993), Algeria (1994), Honduras (1994), Pakistan (1994), Kazakhstan (1994), Peru (1994), Cuba (1994), Nicaragua (1994), Lithuania (1994), Bulgaria (1995), Dominican Republic (1995), El Salvador (1995), Gabon (1995), Latvia (1995), Malaysia (1995), Romania (1995), Indonesia (1995), Venezuela (1995), Turkey (1995), Lebanon (1996), Ecuador (1996), Costa Rica (1997), Croatia (1997), Estonia (1997), India (1997), Panama (1997), Slovenia (1998), South Africa 1998), Ukraine (1998), the Kingdom of Jordan (1999), Trinidad and Tobago (1999), Bolivia (2001), Jamaica (2002), Iran (2002), the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (2002), Bosnia and Herzegovina (2002), Nigeria (2002), Namibia (2003), Albania (2003), Uzbekistan (2003), Syria (2003), Colombia (2005), Macedonia (2005), Morocco (2005), Kuwait (2005), China (2005), the Republic of Moldova (2006), Mexico (2006), Libya (2007), Bahrain (2008), and Senegal (2008.)
Spain and the United States have a Friendship, Navigation and Commerce (FCN) Treaty and a Bilateral Taxation Treaty (1990). Spanish officials have indicated that they would like to keep the FCN, despite indications in 2004 that the European Commission wanted Member States to terminate bilateral FCN agreements. Some U.S. and Spanish companies and business groups have lobbied the Governments of the U.S. and Spain to negotiate a new Double Taxation Treaty, as they deem the 1990 Treaty outmoded and inadequate. Both governments have indicated their interest in negotiating a new treaty. Separately, U.S. companies operating in Spain say they are disadvantaged to some extent by the Tax Administration’s interpretation of Spanish laws designed to attract foreign investment. For the past several years, the Tax Administration has been investigating and disallowing deductions based on operational restructuring at the European level of a number of U.S.-owned holding companies with a presence in Spain. This situation hinders U.S. direct investment in Spain, as evidenced by the fact that many U.S. companies channel their Spanish investments and operations through third countries. Some companies assert that this practice conflicts with Spain’s obligations under the existing Double Taxation Treaty and suggest that the USG consider invoking the Treaty’s mutual agreement procedure and request government-to-government negotiations.OPIC and Other Investment Insurance Programs
As Spain is a member of the European Union, OPIC insurance is not offered. Various EU directives, as adopted into Spanish law, adequately protect the rights of foreign investors. Spain is a member of the World Bank's Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA).
The economic crisis is having a significant adverse impact on employment in Spain. After having substantially reduced unemployment in the first seven years of the decade, Spain is suffering one of the highest unemployment rates recorded in the last 20 years. The unemployment rate climbed from 8 percent in third quarter of 2007 to 18.8 percent in the fourth quarter of 2009. More than 4.3 million people are reported jobless. According to 2009 statistics, there are about 23 million people in the work force. This figure declined by about 21,000 people last year. Unemployment for women remains slightly higher than the male average, at 19.1 percent compared to 18.6 percent. Spain faces a shortage of high-tech workers for its IT sector and of unskilled workers for its fishing and agricultural industries. Although rapidly slowing, large-scale immigration continued throughout 2008 and 2009 despite the severe unemployment crisis, thereby worsening the situation. The Cabinet launched an initiative in September 2008 whereby it would pay jobless immigrants their social security benefits in a lump sum provided they return to their home countries and promise not to return to Spain for three years. Only a very small number of immigrants are believed to have left the country.
Labor market reforms in 1994 and 1997 eased Spain's well-known labor market rigidities but did not fundamentally change the difficult labor situation. The labor market is divided into permanent workers with benefits and temporary workers with few benefits. The government recognizes that labor market reform is essential to increasing productivity, which Spain needs to do as it faces competition from lower-wage new EU member countries. To encourage employers to move people from short-term contracts to regular employment status, in June 2006 the government approved a package of measures designed to provide incentives to employers to hire full-time workers. The initial results of these measures show that the number of temporary contracts decreased by 300,000 and more than a million new full-time contracts were signed, but one third of all employed Spaniards are still classified as temporary hires. Collective bargaining reform was intended to be part of this effort, but so far this has not happened. In early 2005, the Spanish government approved indexing the minimum wage to inflation. The unions supported this position and employers accepted it, albeit unenthusiastically, with some employer representatives questioning the decision.
Collective bargaining is widespread in both the private and public sectors. Sixty percent of the working population is covered by collective bargaining agreements, although only a minority (generally estimated to be about 10 percent) of those are actually union members. Under the Spanish system, workers elect delegates to represent them before management every four years. If a certain proportion of those delegates are union-affiliated, those unions form part of the workers' committees. Large employers generally have individual collective agreements. In industries characterized by smaller companies, collective agreements are often industry-wide or regional.
The Constitution guarantees the right to strike, and this right has been interpreted to include the right to call general strikes to protest government policy.
Foreign-Trade Zones/Free Ports
Both on the mainland and islands (and in most Spanish airports and seaports) there are numerous free trade zones where manufacturing, processing, sorting, packaging, exhibiting, sampling and other commercial operations may be undertaken free of any Spanish duties or taxes. The largest free trade zones are in Barcelona, Cadiz and Vigo. Others vary in size from a simple warehouse to several square kilometers. Spanish customs legislation allows for companies to have their own free trade areas. Duties and taxes are payable only on those items imported for use in Spain. These companies have to abide by Spanish labor laws.
Foreign Direct Investment Statistics
|(In Million euros)|
|Total new foreign|
|U.S. new direct investment|
|U.S. share of total new|
|direct investment (%)||15.7||4.7||1.0|
|Total new Spanish|
|New Spanish investment in U.S.||6,548||11,936||7,403|
|U.S. share of total|
|New Spanish investment (%)||10.0||10.8||17.3|
New Foreign Direct Investment in Spain (2008): by country of origin
United Kingdom 34.8 percent
Germany 21.5 percent
The Netherlands 17.0 percent
Luxembourg 7.2 percent
France 6.2 percent
Portugal 1.6 percent
U.S. 1.0 percent
Italy 0.8 percent
New Foreign Direct Investment in Spain (2008): by industry sector destination
Wholesale Tobacco Products 43.8 percent
Electricity 25.0 percent
Banking and Insurance 9.0 percent
Real Estate Promotion 2.0 percent
Telecommunications 1.5 percent
Chemicals 0.6 percent
Source: Directorate General of Trade and Investment, Ministry of Industry, Tourism and Trade.
Source: Directorate General of Trade and Investment, Ministry of Industry, Tourism and Trade. Major Foreign Investors
Foreign investment has played a significant role in modernizing the Spanish economy over the past 35 years. Attracted by Spain's large domestic market, export possibilities and growth potential, foreign companies in large numbers have set up operations. Spain's automotive industry is almost entirely foreign-owned.
Multinationals control half of the food production companies, a third of chemical firms, and two-thirds of the cement sector. Several foreign banks have acquired networks from Spanish banks, and foreign firms control close to one third of the insurance market. In 2008, Spain recorded USD 56.3 billion in new foreign direct investment (FDI), an increase of 9 percent compared with investment in 2007. In 2008, Spain continued as the seventh recipient of new FDI in the world and the fourth in the European Union. As noted above, new investment declined significantly in the first nine months of 2009.