Transparency of the Regulatory System
France’s government has made considerable progress in the last decade on the transparency and accessibility of its regulatory system. The French government generally engages in industry and public consultation before drafting legislation or rulemaking through a regular but variable process directed by the relevant ministry. However, the text of draft legislation is not always publicly available before parliamentary approval. The French government has experimented with new procedures such as online industry consultations for input related to the EU-Japan FTA, the fourth round for which began in September 2016, as well as mandatory impact assessments.
To increase transparency in the French legislative process, all ministries are required to attach an impact assessment to their draft bills. The Prime Minister’s Secretariat General (SGG for Secrétariat Général du Gouvernement) is responsible for ensuring that impact studies are undertaken in the early stages of the drafting process. The State Council (Conseil d’Etat), which must be consulted on all draft laws and regulations, may reject a draft bill if the impact assessment is inadequate.
U.S. firms may also find it useful to become members of industry associations, which can play an influential role in developing government policies. Even “observer” status can offer insight into new investment opportunities and greater access to government-sponsored projects.
The government has a position of State Secretary for State Reform and Simplification tasked with making French regulations simpler. The State Secretary consults with companies prior to the drafting of legislation that may affect them, working in close cooperation with two other agencies under the Prime Minister: the Prime Minister’s Secretariat General and the Secretariat General for European Affairs. (This policy is part of a wider effort by the European Union to reduce regulatory burdens under the European Commission’s REFIT program.) More than 400 proposed simplification measures have been presented so far, including the “tell us once” initiative for e-government-related services and the provision on “zero additional cost” for all new measures. This means that the impact on businesses of any change in regulations or legislation will be quantified by independent experts, or representatives of the business community, and any new cost should be offset by a “reduction at least equivalent to it.” The State Secretary for Simplification is also charged with promoting open access to public data.
Major reforms extended the investigative and decision-making powers of France’s Competition Authority. The Authority publishes its methodology for calculating fines imposed on companies charged with abuse of a dominant position. It issues specific guidance on competition law compliance, and government ministers, companies, consumer organizations and trade associations now have the right to petition the authority to investigate anti-competitive practices. While the Authority alone examines the impact of mergers on competition, the Minister of the Economy retains the power to request a new investigation or reverse a merger transaction decision for reasons of industrial development, competitiveness, or saving jobs.
International Regulatory Considerations
France incorporates EU regulatory norms. While developing new draft regulations, the French government submits a copy to the World Trade Organization for review to ensure the prospective legislation is not inconsistent with its WTO obligations.
The United States and the EU have negotiated mutual recognition agreements covering the testing and certification of some products; French standards apply where EU-wide standards do not exist. Rigorous testing and approval procedures are sometimes required before goods approved in the United States are cleared for sale in France. Some foreign companies have expressed concern regarding France’s standard-setting procedures.
Legal System and Judicial Independence
French law is codified into what is sometimes referred to as the Napoleonic Code, but is officially the Code Civil des Français, or French Civil Code. Private law governs interactions between individuals (e.g., civil, commercial, and employment law) and public law governs the relationship between the government and the people (e.g., criminal, administrative, and constitutional law).
France also has an administrative court system to challenge a decision by local governments and the national government; the State Council (Conseil d’Etat) is the appellate court. France enforces foreign legal decisions such as judgments, rulings and arbitral awards through the procedure of exequatur introduced before the Tribunal de Grande Instance (TGI), which is the court of original jurisdiction in the French legal system.
France has a distinctive system of protection of intellectual and industrial property rights, applicable not only to artistic or creative rights approximately equivalent to copyright, but also to designs, drawings, patents and trademarks. Firms can register and protect innovation on French territory with the centralized authority for registering industrial property rights, the INPI (Institut National de la Propriété Industrielle, http://www.inpi.fr ). French attorneys are qualified and specialized in the specific field of intellectual property. No French commercial court has a monopoly on intellectual property rights. The French Courts are frequently called upon to decide claims from holders of intellectual property rights.
With regard to French patents, actions are generally brought before the High Court (Tribunal de Grande Instance), however questions of jurisdiction may arise concerning foreign patents. The French judicial system is independent, competent, and substantively fair and reliable. Firms can also protect their rights on the European territory or in foreign countries. Cases related to intellectual property rights on a European community brand can be brought to the European courts or the European Court of Justice. French courts must recognize and enforce judgments of foreign courts.
France’s Commercial Tribunal (Tribunal de Commerce or TDC) specializes in commercial litigation. Magistrates of the commercial tribunals are lay judges, who are well-known in the business community and have experience in the sectors they represent. Decisions by the commercial courts can be appealed before the Court of Appeals. France’s judicial system is procedurally competent, fair, and reliable and is independent of the government.
Regulatory decisions may be appealed administratively, or in the court of first instance.
Laws and Regulations on Foreign Direct Investment
Foreign and domestic private entities have the right to establish and own business enterprises and engage in all sorts of remunerative activities. U.S. investment in France is subject to the provisions of the Convention on Establishment between the United States of America and France, which was signed in 1959 and remains in force. The rights it provides U.S. nationals and companies include: Rights equivalent to those of French nationals in all commercial activities (excluding communications, air transportation, water transportation, banking, the exploitation of natural resources, the production of electricity, and professions of a scientific, literary, artistic and educational nature as well as certain regulated professions like doctors and lawyers);
Treatment equivalent to that of French or third-country nationals with respect to transfer of funds between France and the United States; property is protected from expropriation except for public purposes, accompanied by payment that is just, realizable and prompt.
Potential investors can provide relevant investment information and links to laws and investment regulations at http://www.businessfrance.fr/ .
Competition and Anti-Trust Laws
Major reforms extended the investigative and decision-making powers of France’s Competition Authority. The Authority publishes its methodology for calculating fines imposed on companies charged with abuse of a dominant position. It issues specific guidance on competition law compliance, and government ministers, companies, consumer organizations and trade associations now have the right to petition the authority to investigate anti-competitive practices. While the Authority alone examines the impact of mergers on competition, the Minister of the Economy retains the power to request a new investigation or reverse a merger transaction decision for reasons of industrial development, competitiveness, or saving jobs.
A new law on Economic Growth, Activity and Equal Opportunities (known as the “Macron Law”), adopted in August 2016, vested the Competition Authority with the power to review mergers between retailers ex ante (beforehand). The law provides that all contracts binding a retail business to a distribution network shall expire at the same time. This enables the retailer to switch to another distribution network more easily. Furthermore, distributors are prohibited from restricting a retailer’s commercial activity via post-contract terms. The civil fine incurred for restrictive practices can now amount to up to 5% of the business’s revenue earned in France.
The Competition Authority is also active in highly regulated industries such as energy. Together with the energy regulator CRE (Commission de Régulation de l’Énergie), the Authority submits a report every five years to the government on the implementation and effects of the Regulated Access to Incumbent Nuclear Electricity (ARENH) mechanism, particularly regarding its impact on the wholesale and retail markets, as well as investments in electricity production facilities. The ARENH mechanism entitles suppliers to purchase electricity from EDF at a regulated price, in volumes determined by the CRE. In its opinion published on February 16, 2016, the Authority urged the government to give a clear indication that it would start progressively phasing out this mechanism. The Authority has deemed the current system not conducive to “effective competition in France’s basic energy production market.”
Expropriation and Compensation
Government cannot legally expropriate property to build public infrastructure without fair market compensation. There have been no expropriations of note during the reporting period.
Dispute Settlement
ICSID Convention and New York Convention
France is a member of both the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) Convention and a signatory to the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958 New York Convention) which means local courts are obligated to enforce international arbitral awards under this system.
France was one of the first countries to enact a modern arbitration law in 1980-1981. In 2011, the French Ministry of Justice issued Decree 2011- 48 which introduced further international best practices into French arbitration procedural law. As a result of that decree, parties are free to agree orally to settle their disputes through arbitration, and the arbitrators to apply their chosen procedure, subject only to minimum standards of due process and a newly enacted principle of procedural efficiency and fairness. The President of the Tribunal de Grande Instance (High Civil Court of First Instance) of Paris has the authority to issue orders related to ad-hoc international arbitration (i.e., not institutional arbitration). Paris is the seat of the International Chamber of Commerce’s International Court of Arbitration, composed of representatives from 90 countries, that handles investment as well as commercial disputes.
International Commercial Arbitration and Foreign Courts
As part of France’s arbitration law parties are free to agree orally to settle their disputes through arbitration, and the arbitrators to apply their chosen procedure, subject only to minimum standards of due process and a newly enacted principle of procedural efficiency and fairness.
The timeframe for dispute resolution varies considerably — up to two years (all forms of appeal included). For emergency situations, a so-called référé procedure is available provided there is a danger of irreparable harm; this expedited procedure takes just a few days.
Bankruptcy Regulations
France has extensive and detailed bankruptcy regulations. Any creditor, regardless of the amount owed, may file suit in bankruptcy court against a debtor. Foreign creditors, equity shareholders and foreign contract holders have the same rights as their French counterparts. Monetary judgments by French courts on firms established in France are generally made in euros. Not bankruptcy itself, but bankruptcy fraud — the misstatement by a debtor of his financial position in the context of a bankruptcy — is criminalized. Under France’s bankruptcy managers and other entities responsible for the bankruptcy of a French company are prevented from escaping liability by shielding their assets (Law 2012-346). France adopted a law that enables debtors to implement a restructuring plan with financial creditors only, without affecting trade creditors. In the World Bank’s 2017 Doing Business rankings, France remained in 24th of 189 on ease of resolving insolvency.