Transparency of the Regulatory System
In general, the regulatory environment in Bulgaria is characterized by complexity, lack of transparency, and arbitrary or weak enforcement. These factors create incentives for public corruption. Public procurement rules are at times tailored to match certain local business interests. Bulgarian law lists 38 operations subject to licensing. The law requires all regulations to be justified by defined need (in terms of national security, environmental protection, or personal and material rights of citizens), and prohibits restrictions merely incidental to the stated purposes of the regulation. The law also requires the regulating authority, or the member of Parliament sponsoring the draft law containing the regulation, to perform a cost-benefit analysis of any proposed regulation. This requirement, however, is often ignored when Parliament reviews draft bills. With few exceptions, all draft bills are made available for public comment, both on the central government website and the respective agency’s website, and interested parties are given 30 days to submit their opinions.
The government maintains a web platform, www.strategy.bg , on which it posts draft legislation. The government posts all its decisions on pris.government.bg . In addition, the law eliminates bureaucratic discretion in granting requests for routine economic activities and provides for silent consent (default judgement in favor of the requestor) when the government does not respond to a request in the allotted time. Local companies in which foreign partners have controlling interests may be requested to provide additional information or to meet additional mandatory requirements in order to engage in certain licensed activities, including production and export of arms and ammunition, banking and insurance, and the exploration, development, and exploitation of natural resources. The Bulgarian government licenses the export of dual-use goods and bans the export of all goods under international trade sanctions lists. The Bulgarian government’s budget is assessed as transparent and in accordance with international standards and principles. Central government debt and debt guarantees are published monthly, and debt obligations by individual state-owned enterprises (SOEs) are published every three months on the website of the Agency for Public Enterprises and Control.
The first and only Bulgarian think tank for sustainable finance and energy, the Green Finance & Energy Centre , was launched in March 2021 by the Bulgarian Stock Exchange (BSE) and the Independent Bulgarian Energy Exchange (IBEX), in partnership with the Ministries of Finance and Energy, the Financial Supervision Commission, and the Fund of Funds. The mission of the Green Centre includes raising business awareness and upgrading corporate governance codes with environmental and social responsibility provisions. Major banks and investors increasingly recognize the importance of sustainable finance and investment in supporting economic growth while reducing environmental degradation.
International Regulatory Considerations
Bulgaria became a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in December 1996. Under the provisions of Article 207 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (Lisbon Treaty), common EU trade policies are exclusively the responsibility of the EU and the European Commission (EC), which coordinates them with the 27 member states. The EC negotiates in the WTO on behalf of the Member States and coordinates issues with them within the Trade Policy Committee of the Council of the EU.
Legal System and Judicial Independence
Following systemic government-controlled prosecutions during Bulgaria’s communist era, the 1991 Constitution created an independent judicial branch comprised of judges, prosecutors, and magistrate-investigators. The system is governed by a 25-member Supreme Judicial Council (SJC), which is responsible for the selection and disciplining of magistrates; however, according to local and international observers, its decisions have been opaque and politically influenced, in large part due to the manner in which its members are appointed for a five-year term in office. Eleven of the SJC members are appointed by a supermajority in Parliament, a process often leading to behind-the-scenes distribution of seats among political parties. The five rounds of elections held in Bulgaria in the past two years and the related political instability have impeded Parliament’s selection of new SJC members to replace the incumbents, who continue to serve beyond their term. Similarly, Parliament is three years late on replacing the members of the SJC Inspectorate, the body responsible for investigating corruption and conflict of interest complaints against magistrates.
All 1,500 prosecutors are administratively subordinate to the Prosecutor General, who is also a voting member of the SJC and as such has significant decision-making power over judicial selections. The Prosecutor General is appointed by a majority of the SJC members for a 7-year term. The Council of Europe and the European Commission have criticized the lack of an independent mechanism to hold the Prosecutor General accountable. Numerous media and civil society investigations in recent years have alleged nepotism, corruption, and undue political and business influence over prosecutions, including with the purpose to take over lucrative businesses. Prosecutors’ decisions to dismiss cases are not subject to review by a judge, and trials, especially in criminal cases, often take years to complete because of the inefficient procedures laid out in the criminal procedure code. According to NGOs, information on ongoing and dismissed investigations is publicized selectively, further limiting opportunities for independent monitoring. As of April 2023, there has been no significant progress on high-profile corruption investigations, nor on investigations related to individuals sanctioned in 2021 and 2023 by the U.S. Department of the Treasury under the Global Magnitsky Act.
There are three levels of courts. Bulgaria’s 113 regional courts exercise jurisdiction over civil and criminal cases. Above them, 29 district courts, including the Sofia City Court, which has jurisdiction over high-level public corruption cases, serve as courts of appellate review for regional court decisions and have trial-level (first-instance) jurisdiction in serious criminal cases and in civil cases where claims exceed BGN 25,000 (USD 13,500), excluding alimony, labor disputes, and financial audit discrepancies, or in property cases where the property’s value exceeds BGN 50,000 (USD 27,500). Five appellate courts review the first-instance decisions of the district courts. The Supreme Court of Cassation is the court of last resort for criminal and civil appeals. There is a separate system of 28 specialized administrative courts which rule on the legality of local and national government decisions, with the Supreme Administrative Court serving as the court of final instance. Observers note negative trends in the administrative court system, including inconsistent caselaw, limited access to court information, and insufficient enforcement of decisions. A 12-member Constitutional Court, which is separate from the rest of the judiciary, issues final rulings on the compliance of laws with the Constitution. The court currently operates with only 10 members as Parliament has failed to appoint new judges.
The judiciary continues to be one of the least trusted institutions in the country, with widespread allegations of nepotism, corruption, and undue political and business influence. Despite some improvements, the busiest courts in Sofia continue to suffer from serious backlogs and inefficient procedures, including slow and controversial implementation of electronic services, that hamper the swift and fair administration of justice.
Bulgaria’s legislation has been largely aligned with EU directives to provide adequate means of enforcing property and contractual rights. In practice, however, investors complain about regulatory impediments, prosecutorial intervention in administrative cases, and inconsistent jurisprudence. Overall, the government’s handling of investment disputes has been slow, interagency coordination is poor, and intervention at the highest political level is often required. According to observers, regulators, which should be technically independent of the government, have been ineffective in exercising their oversight functions, particularly in enforcing anti-trust and energy regulations.
Laws and Regulations on Foreign Direct Investment
The 2004 Investment Promotion Act stipulates equal treatment of foreign and domestic investors. The law encourages investment in manufacturing and high technology, knowledge intensive services, education, and human resource development. It creates investment incentives by helping investors purchase land, providing state financing for basic infrastructure, and training new staff, and facilitating tax incentives and opportunities for public-private partnerships (PPPs) with the central and local governments. The most common form of PPPs are concessions, which include the lease of government property for private use for up to 35 years for a construction and service concession. The term of the concession may be extended by a maximum of one third of the original term. The majority of concessions are granted for infrastructure, transport services, and mineral water extraction. In 2021, defense and security were excluded from concession-eligible sectors. There are no restrictions for foreign-owned companies to participate in the concession process and be awarded a concession, however, at least one U.S. investor has faced challenges enforcing these concessions in the past.
Foreign investors must comply with the 1991 Commercial Law, which regulates commercial and company enterprise law, and the 1951 Law on Obligations and Contracts, which regulates civil transactions.
Competition and Antitrust Laws
The Commission for Protection of Competition oversees market competition and enforces the Law on the Protection of Competition. The Competition Law, enacted in 2008, is intended to implement EU rules that promote competition. The law forbids monopolies, restrictive trade practices, abuse of market power, and certain forms of unfair competition. Monopolies can only be legally established in enumerated categories of strategic industries. In practice, the Competition Law has been applied inconsistently, and some of the Commission’s decisions are questionable and appear subject to political influence.
Expropriation and Compensation
Private real property rights are legally protected by the Bulgarian Constitution. Only in the case where a public priority cannot be met by other means may the Council of Ministers or a regional governor expropriate land, in which case the owner is compensated at fair market value. Expropriation actions by the Council of Ministers, by regional authorities, or by municipal mayor can be appealed at a local administrative court. In its Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) with the United States, Bulgaria committed to international arbitration as an option to adjudicate unresolved expropriation claims and other investment disputes.
Dispute Settlement
ICSID Convention and New York Convention
Bulgaria is a signatory to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958 New York convention) and the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID).
Investor-State Dispute Settlement
Bulgaria accepts binding international arbitration in disputes with foreign investors. There are 40 arbitration institutions in Bulgaria; the Arbitration Court of the Bulgarian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (BCCI) is the oldest. In 2023 parliament passed a Law on Mediation that may lead to more disputes being settled.
International Commercial Arbitration and Foreign Courts
Bulgaria is a signatory to the 1961 European Convention on International Commercial Arbitration. Arbitral awards, both foreign and domestic, are enforced through the judicial system. The party must petition the competent district court for a writ of execution and then execute the award according to the general framework for execution of judgments. Foreclosure proceedings may also be initiated.
A dispute settlement proceeding can drag on for years. Legal amendments passed in 2021 allow for the electronic filing and processing of documents in civil litigation cases, which is expected to expedite settlements.
Bankruptcy Regulations
The 1994 Commercial Law Chapter on Bankruptcy provides for reorganization or rehabilitation of a legal entity, maximizes asset recovery, and provides for fair and equal distribution among all creditors. The law applies to all commercial entities, except public monopolies or state-owned enterprises (SOEs). The 2015 Insurance Code regulates insurance company failures, while bank failures are regulated under the 2002 Bank Insolvency Act and the 2006 Credit Institutions Act.
Non-performance of a financial obligation must be adjudicated before the bankruptcy court can determine whether the debtor is insolvent. There is a presumption of insolvency when the debtor is unable to perform an executable obligation under a commercial transaction or public debt or related commercial activities, has suspended all payments, or is able to pay only the claims of certain creditors. The debtor is deemed over-indebted if its assets are insufficient to cover its short-term monetary obligations.
Bankruptcy proceedings may be initiated on two grounds: the debtor’s insolvency, or the debtor’s excessive indebtedness. Under Part IV of the Commercial Law, debtors or creditors, including state authorities such as the National Revenue Agency, can initiate bankruptcy proceedings. The debtor must declare bankruptcy within 30 days of becoming insolvent or over-indebted. Bankruptcy proceedings supersede other court proceedings initiated against the debtor except for labor cases, enforcement proceedings, and cases related to receivables securitized by third parties’ property. Such cases may be initiated even after bankruptcy proceedings begin.
Creditors must declare to the trustee all debts owed to them within one month of the start of bankruptcy proceedings. The trustee then has seven days to compile a list of debts. A rehabilitation plan must be proposed within one month after publication of the list of debts in the Commercial Register. After creditors’ approval, the court endorses the rehabilitation plan, terminates the bankruptcy proceeding, and appoints a supervisory body for overseeing the implementation of the rehabilitation plan. The court must endorse the plan within seven days and put it forward to the creditors for approval. The creditors must convene to discuss the plan within a period of 45 days. The court may renew the bankruptcy proceedings if the debtor does not fulfill its obligations under the rehabilitation plan.
The Bulgarian National Bank may revoke the operating license of an insolvent bank when the bank’s own capital is negative, and the bank has not been restructured according to the procedure defined in Article 51 in the Law on the Recovery and Resolution of Credit Institutions and Investment Firms. The license of a bank may be withdrawn under the conditions set out in Article 36 of the Law on Credit Institutions.