The Office of Foreign Assistance (F) provides dynamic tools and resources to assist the U.S. government in foreign assistance implementation, and for the American public to better access and understand foreign assistance.
F resources and reports include:
Congressional Budget Justification
Each year, F works with the State Department’s Office of Budget and Planning and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) to submit the Congressional Budget Justification (CBJ), which highlights funding requirements and priorities for the United States’ foreign affairs budget. Our request is a part of the total federal budget that the President submits to Congress each year. The foreign assistance request makes up less than one percent of the total federal budget.
Foreign Assistance Resource Library (FARL)
The FARL publishes information about the strategies that guide the Department’s foreign assistance, how foreign assistance programs are developed, and how we assess the extent to which they are meeting their intended objectives.
On this site you will find information about long-term goals for State Department bureaus and missions, and information about the tools and resources used by Department officials to “manage for results.” Managing for Results is the Department’s approach to planning, budgeting, program design, performance management, evaluation, and learning.
Stabilization Assistance Review (SAR)
F was proud to lead the interagency effort between the Department of State (State), U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), and the Department of Defense (DoD) to complete the Stabilization Assistance Review (SAR). Built upon past lessons learned, the SAR identifies ways in which the United States can best leverage diplomatic engagement, foreign assistance, and defense to stabilize conflict-affected areas. The SAR final report was approved by the Secretary of State, USAID Administrator, and Secretary of Defense in the spring of 2018.
Strategic Prevention Project
The Strategic Prevention Project was launched in 2018 to identify how the United States and international partners can better target foreign assistance to priority fragile states to reduce the risk and severity of violent conflict. The Project’s final report, Strategic Prevention Project: Assessing the Role of Foreign Assistance in Preventing Violent Conflict, highlights that assistance can help prevent violent conflict when it is sensitive to conflict risks, closely coordinated with diplomacy, and aligned with host-nation and local civil society reformers. However, the report concludes that most assistance to fragile states over the past decade was designed to address other development and foreign policy priorities and was not tailored in this way.
The Strategic Prevention Project is one example of how F is working to promote more strategic, coordinated, and effective U.S. foreign assistance on behalf of the American people. F led this Project, working in partnership with State’s Bureau of Conflict and Stabilization Operations and USAID’s Bureau for Democracy, Conflict, and Humanitarian Assistance and Bureau for Policy, Planning, and Learning. F will work with experts across the State Department, USAID, and the wider U.S. government in the months ahead to translate the report into concrete foreign assistance policies and practices.
Urbanization Project Literature Review
Launched in 2019, the urbanization project of F/P aimed to identify the opportunities and challenges that increased urbanization offers to strategic use of US foreign assistance. This report, approved in April of 2020, summarizes the findings of the literature survey conducted as a major component of that effort. Many studies show challenges associated with the rapid urbanization of developing countries, and these are often broadly understood. Less appreciated, often, are the many opportunities that urbanization offers to urban populations, national well-being, and US policy goals. With some important caveats, urbanization is broadly associated with greater health, educational attainment, economic performance, and governance. Properly investing foreign assistance funds in urban settings can further US strategic goals such as speeding the journey to self reliance and enhance the effectiveness of investments in foreign assistance.
Foreign Assistance Data Review (FADR)
The Department of State continues to make progress in its efforts to improve tracking and reporting of foreign assistance data through the Foreign Assistance Data Review (FADR). The FADR was chartered in September 2014 to evaluate the capture and tracking of foreign assistance activity data from budgeting, planning, and allocation through obligation and disbursement. This full report outlines findings and recommendations for improving the Department’s ability to track and report foreign assistance data, and approaches to enable more accurate, streamlined, and standardized foreign assistance data across Department bureaus. A FADR Data Element Index identifies 57 data elements that must be standardized and incorporated into the enterprise-wide data management systems.
F manages www.ForeignAssistance.gov, the U.S. government’s main tool for improving transparency in U.S. foreign assistance spending. ForeignAssistance.gov publishes foreign assistance data from nearly 20 agencies across the U.S. government, including the Department of State and USAID. Transparency and open data enable stakeholders and the general public to better understand U.S. foreign assistance investments around the world, make foreign assistance more useful for development, and help hold ourselves more accountable.
ForeignAssistance.gov recently launched a data analysis tool that helps users create custom visualizations powered by U.S. foreign assistance data and nearly 300 expertly curated country performance indicators. Users can plot this information to explore trends and spark insights. Users can also build charts to investigate development trends over time or across countries, regions, income groups, and more. Start exploring at www.ForeignAssistance.gov/Analyze.
Program and Project Design, Monitoring, and Evaluation
In 2017, the Department of State finalized a Program Design and Performance Management Policy that encompasses program design, monitoring, an enhanced version of the existing evaluation policy, and regular reviews of progress. The new policy, which applies to the entire State Department, requires program/project logic models and theories of change aligned to higher level strategies, regular monitoring, evaluation, and data-driven reviews for learning and adapting. Monitoring and evaluation data and findings help managers learn what works, implement course corrections when needed, make informed budget decisions, and provide accountability for the effectiveness of programs. Evaluation reports that are not classified are required to be posted publicly.
The Standardized Program Structure and Definitions (SPSD) is F’s “dictionary,” providing a common set of definitions and a consistent way to categorize and account for State Department and USAID managed foreign assistance. This common language allows us to establish indicators for measuring performance, and to develop a comprehensive body of knowledge regarding program effectiveness. The SPSD is an interagency tool that provides a common vocabulary, and the capability to respond quickly and transparently to stakeholders.
The Program Design and Performance Management Toolkit provides the State Department with step-by-step instructions and templates for designing programs, projects, and processes that align with and advance their broader strategic goals, monitoring and evaluating progress and results, and using that information to conduct internal learning.
An interagency framework for promoting coordination among U.S. Departments and Agencies operating in the security sector to implement the principles of sound program design and performance management.
An annual report submitted by all missions and bureaus implementing foreign assistance resources to convey progress towards their foreign assistance strategic objectives.
Collected via the Performance Plan and Report, these indicators enable Washington to collect standard data on important program and operational results achieved by individual missions worldwide, and can be aggregated to show overall results for foreign assistance that are used internally as well as for accountability to Congress and the public.
Protecting Life in Global Health Assistance (PLGHA) Policy
On January 23, 2017, President Trump issued a Presidential Memorandum reinstating the January 22, 2001, Presidential memorandum on the “Mexico City Policy” for family-planning assistance awarded by USAID, and directing the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, to implement a plan to extend the Mexico City Policy to “global health assistance furnished by all departments or agencies” to the extent allowable by law. The expanded policy is referred to as “Protecting Life in Global Health Assistance (PLGHA).”
On May 9, 2017, the Secretary of State, in coordination with Secretary of Health and Human Services, approved the implementation plan for the PLGHA policy. The State Department, working with USAID, HHS, and DoD, committed to conduct a comprehensive review of progress in extending the policy to global health assistance, identify any implementation challenges, and recommend solutions to them. The State Department has worked closely with USAID, HHS, and DoD to implement the policy consistently, examine progress in carrying it out, and monitor its effects.
This Six-Month Review summarizes the implementation of the PLGHA policy through the end of fiscal year 2017, and identifies implementation challenges that have arisen, along with actions to address them. Download Report»
On March 26, 2019, Secretary Pompeo announced that the State Department will not amend the PLGHA policy requirement regarding “financial support” as outlined in the Six-Month Review approved by Secretary Tillerson in February 2018. The policy continues to apply to foreign NGOs that are direct recipients or sub-recipients of U.S. global health assistance. A final review of the implementation of the PLGHA policy is forthcoming in 2019 and will be posted to this site when finalized.
For more information, please see the PLGHA Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) and Answers.