QUESTION:  Mike Pompeo is the U.S. Secretary of State, and he is my guest here on The Guy Benson Show.  Mr. Secretary, thank you, first of all, for having me along on your trip to Brussels and Sochi, and thanks for doing the show.

SECRETARY POMPEO:  It was great to have you with us.  I hope you learned something from the trip and benefitted from it.

QUESTION:  No doubt, no doubt.  So as we were landing at Andrews Air Force Base yesterday morning, the news was breaking that the State Department was ordering all nonessential personnel out of U.S. diplomatic missions in Iraq.  Also a long planned diplomatic security summit had been postponed.  All of that was related to intensifying threats from Iran, so it became clear to me there why you chose to divert the beginning of our trip to Brussels, where you met with your E3 counterparts on that issue.

Can you tell us a bit more about how and why the administration reached the decision to take those actions?

SECRETARY POMPEO:  Guy, I can’t say much about the intelligence proper, but all should know that there is real data that underlies the risks that we’ve identified that caused us to make these decisions.  As for the process, at the State Department we have a detailed process we talk about in terms of how we make sure to keep American diplomats safe, what risks we’re prepared to take, how we defend ourselves.  And we concluded, given the escalating risk in the region, that it made sense for us to get those nonessential personnel out of Iraq.

QUESTION:  There’s something of a media narrative that seems to be congealing that this is part of the Trump administration’s sort of effort to goad Iran into war.  And I think that’s cynical, I think that’s unfair.  I also understand that a lot of Americans have a sensitivity to these issues that sort of relate to intelligence gathering and potential armed conflict.

I know that you can’t get into too much of the intelligence, as you just said, but are there any additional details about the nature of the threat metrics – matrix that you’ve been seeing from Iran in the last few days?  And can you comment at all on the New York Times report this morning that it may have been related to – or some of this may have been related to new images of sea-based missiles from Iran?

SECRETARY POMPEO:  It’s important for everyone to understand that this is 40 years of aggression by the Islamic Republic of Iran.  So to put it into just three days or five days or seven days takes out of context the threat and the desires of the Islamic Republic of Iran.  And so all of this is part and parcel of the challenge of a revolutionary regime that wants the “Great Satan” and Israel to go away.  And so you have to take the data set along with – right, it’s always about capability and will – demonstrated will, ill will – against the United States of America.

And so the things that you see – and I can’t comment on the New York Times story other than to say the things that you’ve seen us do to attempt to achieve deterrence against the Islamic Republic of Iran from their malign activity is a direct response to eight years of an administration that allowed the terror regime to expand, right.  During the JCPOA, we had increased missile capabilities coming out of Iran.  We had their capacity to deliver harm from Houthi rebels in Yemen.  All of these things Iran did happened because the previous administration appeased the Islamic Republic of Iran.

So we are pushing back.  And when you push back, tension does increase.  Our mission set is very clear.  We know what we’re asking the Iranian leadership to do, and we are very focused on achieving that, and we’re trying to do so in a way that makes sure that we keep every American diplomat and every American soldier, sailor, airman, and Marine safe as well.

QUESTION:  Holding intelligence close to the vest is something with which you’re quite familiar because before you took this current job you were the director of the CIA.  I’m curious how you compare these two gigs.  Is there anything that you might prefer about being Secretary of State, anything that you miss about leading the CIA?

SECRETARY POMPEO:  They’re very different roles, and I have enjoyed each of them a great deal.  They require different skillsets from a leadership perspective.  They deliver very different – very different answers for the President of the United States.  One is fact based, designed truly to ensure that the President of the United States and the senior leadership in the United States government have the best, most timely information of any leadership team in the world.

Here, the President is asking me for how to take that data set and apply it against America’s interests:  How do we achieve outcomes that are protective of America’s citizens, keeping us safe, and growing our economy?  Two very different jobs.  I have been privileged to hold each of them and love them both.

QUESTION:  Speaking of American interests, you’ve just returned from Russia, where you met with your counterpart, the Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, and also the Russian President Vladimir Putin.  I think we all know about the tensions and the challenges between our two countries.  They’re pretty obvious – the election interference, Ukraine, Venezuela.  But on the trip, you frequently returned to this refrain about what you called overlapping interests.  So I think a lot of Americans are deeply suspicious of Moscow for legitimate reasons, but can you maybe give some examples of discrete issues on which working with the Russians actually is in our interest?

SECRETARY POMPEO:  You bet, I certainly can.  Look, each of us – and you saw this on the trip – each of our nations is doing its best to protect is own interests.  President Trump certainly has directed me to do everything we can to push back against any country, including Russia, where it threatens an American interest.

But I’ll give you a couple of examples.  Today in Afghanistan, we’re working to try and achieve reconciliation there.  Russia sits very close to Afghanistan and has a terror threat that can emanate from that region in the same way that the United States has a terror threat that may emanate.  There’s an overlap.  If we can achieve a reduction in violence there, we could do good for each of our two countries.

North Korea, another example.  The Russians have an interest too in ensuring that there aren’t loose nuclear materials floating around in the region.  They share a border with the North Koreans.  They have an interest in helping the North Korean economy be successful, once it’s denuclearized.  So there are places there, too, where we not only can but have worked closely together.  When I was the CIA director, we worked on counterterrorism all around the world, passing information about terror threats between our two countries.  I know for certain we kept Americans safe as a result of information that the Russians provided us, and I know we’ve saved Russian lives with information that we had in our possession.  So there’s, goodness, three examples of discrete places where we it makes real sense for the United States and Russia to work together.

QUESTION:  So one of the most memorable moments of the trip for me was when Putin walked into the room.  And just seeing him in the flesh was sort of a moment.  And he made these brief opening comments before you had that private meeting that lasted about an hour and a half.  In those public comments, with the press still in the room, Putin, unsolicited, raised the issue of the Mueller report.  He called Mueller’s findings “exotic” and then a few breaths later said that he thought the investigation was objective.  I’m just wondering, were you surprised that he brought it up the way that he did and how he characterized the Mueller report?

SECRETARY POMPEO:  Oh, goodness.  Very little surprises me these days, Guy.  So no, I can’t say I was terribly surprised that the – President Putin’s view on the Mueller report wasn’t what I’d gone there for.  We went there for a very substantive set of conversations, which we were able to successfully have.  But I think he was pointing to this issue of collusion, sort of the core finding from the Mueller report.  I think he had felt burdened by that and that he feels as though President Trump was burdened by that as well.  So I think in that sense he was saying hey, the deck – the idea that somehow there had been direct collusion between President Trump and the campaign and the Russian leadership – the fact that the Mueller report dispelled that, I think he found useful as a turning point to try and find a better way for conversations between our two countries.  I think that was his core point.

QUESTION:  A major – one of the major issues, Mr. Secretary, that came up in your meetings, according to Lavrov and yourself, was Venezuela.  And you held a press conference with the foreign minister.  I asked a question about Venezuela.  And Lavrov sort of launched into this whole, in my view, tendentious answer with – about history and sort of deflecting blame onto the U.S. and suggesting that it’s Maduro’s opponents that are the true villains in this.  I guess I wasn’t terribly surprised to hear that spin coming from the Russians, although it was kind of galling to see it in person.

But I was struck that some of that – some of that moral inversion, if you will – sounded a bit like some of the commentary we’ve heard from some elected officials here at home, including a Democratic member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.  What’s your reaction when you hear what amounts to pro-Maduro propaganda, frankly, from some American politicians?

SECRETARY POMPEO:  Yeah, I’m bothered when the Russians do it.  I am deeply troubled when Americans do it.  Look, we know the facts in Venezuela pretty clearly.  We have a regime that has destroyed the lives of millions of Venezuelan people.  It’s a country that’s not a poor country by necessity, but rather a poor country as a result of failed leadership and a failed economic model and looting and corruption.  The United States effort to assist the Venezuelan people achieve their democracy is pure in its objectives, right?  We are truly a force for good in Venezuela today.  I can prove it with the 300 metric tons of food sitting on the border, waiting to go in, and provide medicine to sick children and food to those kids who are starving.

So when I do hear – when I hear an American sort of blame the United States for the situation in Venezuela, it’s both factually wrong and sickening.  And I regret it.  The best solution is to fight back with facts.  And the good news is there has been a bipartisan consensus on Venezuela that we are, in fact, there for the right reasons and that our mission set there is important and noble.

QUESTION:  Question about the President.  He recently suggested that one of your predecessors from the previous administration, John Kerry, should possibly be prosecuted under the Logan Act for Kerry’s reported ongoing back channels with the Iranians.  Critics say that’s undermining the Trump administration’s tougher policy on Iran.  Senator Marco Rubio of Florida just this week called for a formal investigation into Kerry’s conduct on that front.  As the sitting Secretary of State, what do you make of all of that?

SECRETARY POMPEO:  It is ahistorical and completely unhelpful when previous secretaries of State are continuing to engage in the tasks that they engaged in when they were the secretary of State.  I’ll leave it at that, in the sense of it’s time to get off the stage for the previous administration.  I understand they have different views than we have.  They are entitled to those views.  But talking with senior leaders around the world and suggesting to them somehow that waiting out this administration is the best course of action for those countries is something that is unheard of.  It is fundamentally different than any previous administration has undertaken, and they ought to leave the foreign policy to us, and then do their best to get folks with foreign policy views that have appeased the Iranians, that allowed Chairman Kim Jong-un to continue to advance his nuclear threat that put us prostrate around the world.  If those are the policies they want, they should go fight for them at the ballot box.

QUESTION:  Finally, kind of a personal question here, and it’s something that came to me as we were on this trip together to Brussels and to Sochi.  I think a lot of Americans from a distance kind of intuitively understand that your job requires tons and tons of travel, and there’s constant high-level meetings, but I’m not even sure that I understood how grueling your schedule can be until I experienced it firsthand with you, and that was just three days.  I was ready to tap out.  After the third day, I’m like, “All right, this is a lot, wow.”  And that was after really a week of a lot of traveling for you all over the world.

Your team was telling me on the plane that one of the things that you loathe more than anything in the world is being away from your wife.  So I’m wondering, how has your family adjusted to this breakneck pace and the near-constant travel that the position requires?  And how are you trying to, I don’t know, mitigate some of that strain that’s sort of inherent in the job?

SECRETARY POMPEO:  Look, I welcome that question.  It’s interesting that my team said that.  It’s true.  I’m very blessed to have a wonderful wife and a son who’s a huge supporter as well.  They’ve been awesome.  They keep me emboldened when I need it and humble when I deserve it, and they just truly understand that this is a time of service for our family.  We have this incredible privilege to serve America and to serve the Constitution and President Trump, and they have done everything they can to help me be as successful as I can be in this role.

I try when I’m back here to get home in the evening in time to spend a little bit of time with my wife before I go back to reading, and we try to get to church and do all the things that are normal in the Pompeo family life so that we don’t become too disconnected from the world that we loved so much before we had this incredible opportunity.

QUESTION:  Yeah, but I mean, it really is nonstop, around the clock.

SECRETARY POMPEO:  Yes, sir.  It’s a big job, but I signed up for it voluntarily, no complaints, and I’m going to keep working hard until the day comes when I’m no longer in it.

QUESTION:  Well, we appreciate that very much.  We also really appreciate your time.  Secretary Mike Pompeo, U.S. Secretary of State, thank you, sir, for joining the Guy Benson Show.

SECRETARY POMPEO:  Thank you, sir.  Thanks for joining me on the trip, Guy.

QUESTION:  It was my pleasure.

SECRETARY POMPEO:  You bet, sir.  So long.

QUESTION:  Thank you, Mr. Secretary.

SECRETARY POMPEO:  Yep.  Guy, thank you.  Have a great day.

QUESTION:  You too.

U.S. Department of State

Welcome to the new State.gov

Our new design makes it easier to find and learn about the State Department’s programs and services—from passports and visas to learning how U.S. diplomacy benefits the American people.